hi all
have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
results with gcc?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
>
> roy
It's faster, but i read that it cannot compile the kernel yet.
Fran?ois
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: gcc vs intel's cc
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
I have heard it's pretty nice, even for Athlon XP's, but you can't compile
the kernel with it anyway, so this should not be in "linux-kernel".
_____________________________________________________
| Martin Eriksson <[email protected]>
| MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
| Ume? University, Sweden
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
yes and no.
The intel compiler has shown better performance
for userspace programs - however it is incapable
of compiling the kernel.
cu
jjs