2022-06-08 03:46:33

by Joe Damato

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 5.19-rc1 x86 build failure

Greetings:

My apologies if this is the incorrect place to report this, but I got a
build error when trying to compile the net-next 5.19-rc1 tree.

git bisect says that commit a1e2c031ec394 ("x86/mm: Simplify
RESERVE_BRK()") is responsible for the build issue I am hitting.

I am performing this build on an x86_64 system with GNU C11 (Ubuntu
5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.12) version 5.4.0 20160609 (x86_64-linux-gnu).

The assembler outputs a cryptic error message:

/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:98: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `U'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: missing ')'
/tmp/ccnGOKZ5.s:99: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `U'

I've asked GCC to generate the assembly and output so I can see more
specifically where this issue is (via "-fverbose-asm -Wa,-adhln=output"):

96 .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits
97 .brk.early_pgt_alloc:
98 ???? 00000000 .skip ((2 * 3) * ((1UL) << 12))
**** Error: missing ')'
**** Error: missing ')'
**** Error: missing ')'
**** Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `U'
98 0000
100 .popsection

This comes from arch/x86/mm/init.c, which has the following code:

RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);

wherein INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE (via PAGE_SIZE) has a "1UL" which makes the
assembler unhappy.

I don't really know what the correct way to fix this is; it seems that the
macro _AC should handle this if ASSEMBLY is defined, IIUC, but that does
not seem to be the case at this point in init.c.

Perhaps I am doing something incorrect during the build process causing
this to happen?

Thanks,
Joe


2022-06-08 08:49:09

by Josh Poimboeuf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 5.19-rc1 x86 build failure

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:42:33PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/06/2022 13:19, Joe Damato wrote:
> > 96 .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits
> > 97 .brk.early_pgt_alloc:
> > 98 ???? 00000000 .skip ((2 * 3) * ((1UL) << 12))
> > **** Error: missing ')'
> > **** Error: missing ')'
> > **** Error: missing ')'
> > **** Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `U'
> > 98 0000
> > 100 .popsection
> >
> > This comes from arch/x86/mm/init.c, which has the following code:
> >
> > RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);
> >
> > wherein INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE (via PAGE_SIZE) has a "1UL" which makes the
> > assembler unhappy.
> >
> > I don't really know what the correct way to fix this is; it seems that the
> > macro _AC should handle this if ASSEMBLY is defined, IIUC, but that does
> > not seem to be the case at this point in init.c.
> >
> > Perhaps I am doing something incorrect during the build process causing
> > this to happen?
>
> The problem is that _AC() is evaluated in C context (so gains the UL/ULL
> suffix), and the C'd string is fed directly into the assembler (where
> older binutils doesn't tolerate the suffix).
>
> Short of having a _PAGE_SIZE which is an explicitly non-AC()'d constant,
> I'm not sure what to suggest.  Ideally, you'd want to temporarily define
> __ASSEMBLY__ around the expansion of __stringify(), but I don't think
> that's possible as RESERVE_BRK() is a macro itself.

Joe, what version of binutils do you have?

We can fix this by taking a completely different approach: define the
variable in C and just do the "nobits" in the linker script, like below.
I can work up a proper patch tomorrow.


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
index 7590ac2570b9..4704184a2d78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
@@ -108,19 +108,11 @@ extern unsigned long _brk_end;
void *extend_brk(size_t size, size_t align);

/*
- * Reserve space in the brk section. The name must be unique within the file,
+ * Reserve space in the .brk section. The name must be unique within vmlinux,
* and somewhat descriptive. The size is in bytes.
- *
- * The allocation is done using inline asm (rather than using a section
- * attribute on a normal variable) in order to allow the use of @nobits, so
- * that it doesn't take up any space in the vmlinux file.
*/
#define RESERVE_BRK(name, size) \
- asm(".pushsection .brk_reservation,\"aw\",@nobits\n\t" \
- ".brk." #name ":\n\t" \
- ".skip " __stringify(size) "\n\t" \
- ".size .brk." #name ", " __stringify(size) "\n\t" \
- ".popsection\n\t")
+ char __brk_##name[size] __section(".brk_reservation");

extern void probe_roms(void);
#ifdef __i386__
@@ -133,12 +125,16 @@ asmlinkage void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data);

#endif /* __i386__ */
#endif /* _SETUP */
-#else
-#define RESERVE_BRK(name,sz) \
- .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits; \
-.brk.name: \
-1: .skip sz; \
- .size .brk.name,.-1b; \
+
+#else /* __ASSEMBLY */
+
+#define RESERVE_BRK(name, size) \
+ .pushsection .brk_reservation, "aw"; \
+__brk_##name: \
+1: .skip size; \
+ .size __brk_##name, . - 1b; \
.popsection
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_SETUP_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 91831b9d8aa8..f105b8aa055e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ SECTIONS
__end_of_kernel_reserve = .;

. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
- .brk : AT(ADDR(.brk) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
+ .brk (NOLOAD) : AT(ADDR(.brk) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
__brk_base = .;
. += 64 * 1024; /* 64k alignment slop space */
*(.brk_reservation) /* areas brk users have reserved */

2022-06-08 10:17:30

by Joe Damato

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 5.19-rc1 x86 build failure

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:59:56PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:42:33PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 07/06/2022 13:19, Joe Damato wrote:
> > > 96 .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits
> > > 97 .brk.early_pgt_alloc:
> > > 98 ???? 00000000 .skip ((2 * 3) * ((1UL) << 12))
> > > **** Error: missing ')'
> > > **** Error: missing ')'
> > > **** Error: missing ')'
> > > **** Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `U'
> > > 98 0000
> > > 100 .popsection
> > >
> > > This comes from arch/x86/mm/init.c, which has the following code:
> > >
> > > RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);
> > >
> > > wherein INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE (via PAGE_SIZE) has a "1UL" which makes the
> > > assembler unhappy.
> > >
> > > I don't really know what the correct way to fix this is; it seems that the
> > > macro _AC should handle this if ASSEMBLY is defined, IIUC, but that does
> > > not seem to be the case at this point in init.c.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I am doing something incorrect during the build process causing
> > > this to happen?
> >
> > The problem is that _AC() is evaluated in C context (so gains the UL/ULL
> > suffix), and the C'd string is fed directly into the assembler (where
> > older binutils doesn't tolerate the suffix).
> >
> > Short of having a _PAGE_SIZE which is an explicitly non-AC()'d constant,
> > I'm not sure what to suggest. Ideally, you'd want to temporarily define
> > __ASSEMBLY__ around the expansion of __stringify(), but I don't think
> > that's possible as RESERVE_BRK() is a macro itself.
>
> Joe, what version of binutils do you have?

I am using binutils: 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8+esm4.

> We can fix this by taking a completely different approach: define the
> variable in C and just do the "nobits" in the linker script, like below.
> I can work up a proper patch tomorrow.

The change below makes sense to me. I applied it locally and was able to
build the kernel again.

Let me know if you'd like me to try building the next patch you write up.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
> index 7590ac2570b9..4704184a2d78 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h
> @@ -108,19 +108,11 @@ extern unsigned long _brk_end;
> void *extend_brk(size_t size, size_t align);
>
> /*
> - * Reserve space in the brk section. The name must be unique within the file,
> + * Reserve space in the .brk section. The name must be unique within vmlinux,
> * and somewhat descriptive. The size is in bytes.
> - *
> - * The allocation is done using inline asm (rather than using a section
> - * attribute on a normal variable) in order to allow the use of @nobits, so
> - * that it doesn't take up any space in the vmlinux file.
> */
> #define RESERVE_BRK(name, size) \
> - asm(".pushsection .brk_reservation,\"aw\",@nobits\n\t" \
> - ".brk." #name ":\n\t" \
> - ".skip " __stringify(size) "\n\t" \
> - ".size .brk." #name ", " __stringify(size) "\n\t" \
> - ".popsection\n\t")
> + char __brk_##name[size] __section(".brk_reservation");
>
> extern void probe_roms(void);
> #ifdef __i386__
> @@ -133,12 +125,16 @@ asmlinkage void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data);
>
> #endif /* __i386__ */
> #endif /* _SETUP */
> -#else
> -#define RESERVE_BRK(name,sz) \
> - .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits; \
> -.brk.name: \
> -1: .skip sz; \
> - .size .brk.name,.-1b; \
> +
> +#else /* __ASSEMBLY */
> +
> +#define RESERVE_BRK(name, size) \
> + .pushsection .brk_reservation, "aw"; \
> +__brk_##name: \
> +1: .skip size; \
> + .size __brk_##name, . - 1b; \
> .popsection
> +
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_SETUP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index 91831b9d8aa8..f105b8aa055e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ SECTIONS
> __end_of_kernel_reserve = .;
>
> . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
> - .brk : AT(ADDR(.brk) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> + .brk (NOLOAD) : AT(ADDR(.brk) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> __brk_base = .;
> . += 64 * 1024; /* 64k alignment slop space */
> *(.brk_reservation) /* areas brk users have reserved */

2022-06-08 15:39:39

by Josh Poimboeuf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 5.19-rc1 x86 build failure

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:24:25AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/06/2022 01:59, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > @@ -133,12 +125,16 @@ asmlinkage void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data);
> >
> > #endif /* __i386__ */
> > #endif /* _SETUP */
> > -#else
> > -#define RESERVE_BRK(name,sz) \
> > - .pushsection .brk_reservation,"aw",@nobits; \
> > -.brk.name: \
> > -1: .skip sz; \
> > - .size .brk.name,.-1b; \
> > +
> > +#else /* __ASSEMBLY */
> > +
> > +#define RESERVE_BRK(name, size) \
> > + .pushsection .brk_reservation, "aw"; \
> > +__brk_##name: \
> > +1: .skip size; \
> > + .size __brk_##name, . - 1b; \
> > .popsection
>
> While I think about it before you write the patch properly, you ought to
> have a .type in here too, seeing as the C side now gets one.

Good point, I'll just use the SYM_DATA_{START,END} macros.

--
Josh