On 07/12/2012 10:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 14:34 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> From: Michael Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> it's impossible to enter else branch if we have set skip_clock_update
>> in task_yield_fair(), as yield_to_task_fair() will directly return
>> true after invoke task_yield_fair().
>
> It helps if you CC the guy who wrote the code.. I think you're right,
> although getting that skip_clock_update crap wrong is annoying.
>
> Mike?
Hi, Peter
I think Mike also agreed to remove that piece of code, should we action now?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 -------
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 9bb7d28..77c14aa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -4737,13 +4737,6 @@ again:
>> */
>> if (preempt && rq != p_rq)
>> resched_task(p_rq->curr);
>> - } else {
>> - /*
>> - * We might have set it in task_yield_fair(), but are
>> - * not going to schedule(), so don't want to skip
>> - * the next update.
>> - */
>> - rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
>> }
>>
>> out:
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:56 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>
> I think Mike also agreed to remove that piece of code, should we
> action now?
Right you are, applied.