2010-05-12 08:45:38

by Santiago Carot-Nemesio

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial support for MCAP

Hi Raul,
This patch is applied over a old version of MCAP (first that I sent).
New version (splited in 25 patches) fix more of typo error that you are
commented and Gustavo already notified.

El mar, 11-05-2010 a las 19:00 -0300, Raul Herbster escribió:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> only typo errors:
>
> diff --git a/mcap/mcap.c b/mcap/mcap.c
> index 404d7be..6142938 100644
> --- a/mcap/mcap.c
> +++ b/mcap/mcap.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct mcap_mcl {
> #define MCAP_CTRL_CACHED 0x01 /* MCL is cached */
> #define MCAP_CTRL_STD_OP 0x02 /* Support for standard op
> codes */
> #define MCAP_CTRL_SYNC_OP 0x04 /* Support for
> synchronization commands */
> -#define MCAP_CTRL_CONN 0x08 /* MCL is in connectcting
> process */
> +#define MCAP_CTRL_CONN 0x08 /* MCL is in connecting
> process */

This error is already fixed in my previous patch. Be careful, above
definitions are not yet included in mcap.c, update you work tree from
latest patches ;)

> #define MCAP_CTRL_FREE 0x10 /* MCL is marked as
> releasable */
> #define MCAP_CTRL_NOCACHE 0x20 /* MCL is marked as not
> cacheable */
>
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static char *error2str(uint8_t rc)
> return "Invalid Operation";
> case MCAP_RESOURCE_UNAVAILABLE:
> return "Resource Unavailable";
> - case MCAP_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR:
> + case MCAP_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR:

You're right, I'll redo the patch to fix all "UNESPECIFIED" erroneous
word.

> return "Unspecified Error";
> case MCAP_REQUEST_NOT_SUPPORTED:
> return "Request Not Supported";
> @@ -1056,8 +1056,8 @@ static void process_md_create_mdl_req(struct
> mcap_mcl *mcl, uint8_t *cmd, uint32
> if ((cfga != 0) && (cfga != conf)) {
> /* Remote device set default configuration but upper profile
> */
> /* has changed it. Protocol Error: force closing the MCL by
> */
> - /* remote device using UNESPECIFIED_ERROR response */
> - send4B_cmd(mcl, MCAP_MD_CREATE_MDL_RSP,
> MCAP_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR,
> + /* remote device using UNSPECIFIED_ERROR response */
> + send4B_cmd(mcl, MCAP_MD_CREATE_MDL_RSP,
> MCAP_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR,
> mdl_id);
> return;
> }
> @@ -1548,13 +1548,13 @@ static gboolean check_rsp(struct mcap_mcl
> *mcl, uint8_t *cmd, uint32_t len)
> return FALSE;
> }
>
> - if (rsp->rc == MCAP_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR)
> + if (rsp->rc == MCAP_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR)
> goto close_mcl;
>
> return TRUE;
> close_mcl:
> - if (rsp->rc == MCAP_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR)
> - g_set_error(&gerr, MCAP_ERROR, MCAP_ERROR_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR,
> + if (rsp->rc == MCAP_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR)
> + g_set_error(&gerr, MCAP_ERROR, MCAP_ERROR_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR,
> "%s", error2str(rsp->rc));
> else
> g_set_error(&gerr, MCAP_ERROR, MCAP_ERROR_FAILED,
> diff --git a/mcap/mcap.h b/mcap/mcap.h
> index 598e6ce..77c83c2 100644
> --- a/mcap/mcap.h
> +++ b/mcap/mcap.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ extern "C" {
> #define MCAP_MDL_BUSY 0x06
> #define MCAP_INVALID_OPERATION 0x07
> #define MCAP_RESOURCE_UNAVAILABLE 0x08
> -#define MCAP_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR 0x09
> +#define MCAP_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR 0x09
> #define MCAP_REQUEST_NOT_SUPPORTED 0x0A
> #define MCAP_CONFIGURATION_REJECTED 0x0B
> /*RESERVED 0x0C-0xFF*/
> diff --git a/mcap/mcap_lib.h b/mcap/mcap_lib.h
> index fd3eb74..d75e0f0 100644
> --- a/mcap/mcap_lib.h
> +++ b/mcap/mcap_lib.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ typedef enum {
> MCAP_ERROR_MDL_BUSY,
> MCAP_ERROR_INVALID_OPERATION,
> MCAP_ERROR_RESOURCE_UNAVAILABLE,
> - MCAP_ERROR_UNESPECIFIED_ERROR,
> + MCAP_ERROR_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR,
> MCAP_ERROR_REQUEST_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> MCAP_ERROR_CONFIGURATION_REJECTED,
> /* MCAP Internal Errors */
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ typedef void (* mcap_mdl_operation_cb) (struct
> mcap_mdl *mdl, GError *err,
> gpointer data);
> typedef void (* mcap_mdl_del_cb) (GError *err, gpointer data);
>
> -/* Next function should return an MCAP appropiate response code */
> +/* Next function should return an MCAP appropriate response code */

Ok, we don't see that. I'll change it too.

> typedef uint8_t (* mcap_remote_mdl_conn_req_cb) (struct mcap_mcl
> *mcl,
> uint8_t mdepid, uint16_t mdlid,
> uint8_t *conf, gpointer data);
>
>
> []' s
> --Raul
>

Thanks fore typo errors but I suggest to you work with latest patches I
sent 2 days ago.

Regards.