2023-12-12 02:38:53

by Alex Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Add more enc key size check

From: Alex Lu <[email protected]>

When we are slave role and receives l2cap conn req when encryption has
started, we should check the enc key size to avoid KNOB attack or BLUFFS
attack.
From SIG recommendation, implementations are advised to reject
service-level connections on an encrypted baseband link with key
strengths below 7 octets.
A simple and clear way to achieve this is to place the enc key size
check in hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()

The btmon log below shows the case that lacks enc key size check.

> HCI Event: Connect Request (0x04) plen 10
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Class: 0x480104
Major class: Computer (desktop, notebook, PDA, organizers)
Minor class: Desktop workstation
Capturing (Scanner, Microphone)
Telephony (Cordless telephony, Modem, Headset)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
< HCI Command: Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) plen 7
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Role: Peripheral (0x01)
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Connect Complete (0x03) plen 11
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
Encryption: Disabled (0x00)
...

> HCI Event: Encryption Change (0x08) plen 4
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Encryption: Enabled with E0 (0x01)
< HCI Command: Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) plen 2
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 7
Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Key size: 6
// We should check the enc key size
...

> ACL Data RX: Handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12
L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 3 len 4
PSM: 25 (0x0019)
Source CID: 64
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection pending (0x0001)
Status: Authorization pending (0x0002)
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
Num handles: 1
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Count: 1
#35: len 16 (25 Kb/s)
Latency: 5 msec (2-7 msec ~4 msec)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
Status: No further information available (0x0000)

Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v3:
- Use a simple and clear approach according to maintainer's suggestion
Changes in v2:
- Fix compiling issue reported by sparse

net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 2ad7b9f86f74..ef8c3bed7361 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -750,9 +750,23 @@ static u8 hci_cc_read_enc_key_size(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
} else {
conn->enc_key_size = rp->key_size;
status = 0;
+
+ if (conn->enc_key_size < hdev->min_enc_key_size) {
+ /* As slave role, the conn->state has been set to
+ * BT_CONNECTED and l2cap conn req might not be received
+ * yet, at this moment the l2cap layer almost does
+ * nothing with the non-zero status.
+ * So we also clear encrypt related bits, and then the
+ * handler of l2cap conn req will get the right secure
+ * state at a later time.
+ */
+ status = HCI_ERROR_AUTH_FAILURE;
+ clear_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT, &conn->flags);
+ clear_bit(HCI_CONN_AES_CCM, &conn->flags);
+ }
}

- hci_encrypt_cfm(conn, 0);
+ hci_encrypt_cfm(conn, status);

done:
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
--
2.39.2



2023-12-12 03:04:38

by bluez.test.bot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [v3] Bluetooth: Add more enc key size check

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=809021

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.66 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.34 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.13 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 27.61 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 30.37 seconds
CheckSparse WARNING 36.53 seconds
CheckSmatch WARNING 98.92 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 27.25 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 421.86 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 22.96 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 46.60 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 7.02 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 167.54 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 11.14 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 14.67 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 12.00 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 8.92 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 9.93 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 7.33 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 26.08 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckSparse - WARNING
Desc: Run sparse tool with linux kernel
Output:
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c: note: in included file (through include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h):
##############################
Test: CheckSmatch - WARNING
Desc: Run smatch tool with source
Output:
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c: note: in included file (through include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h):
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 497, Passed: 496 (99.8%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Pairing Acceptor - SMP over BR/EDR 1 Timed out 1.996 seconds


---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth

2023-12-12 16:30:35

by patchwork-bot+bluetooth

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Add more enc key size check

Hello:

This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:

On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:30:34 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Alex Lu <[email protected]>
>
> When we are slave role and receives l2cap conn req when encryption has
> started, we should check the enc key size to avoid KNOB attack or BLUFFS
> attack.
> From SIG recommendation, implementations are advised to reject
> service-level connections on an encrypted baseband link with key
> strengths below 7 octets.
> A simple and clear way to achieve this is to place the enc key size
> check in hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [v3] Bluetooth: Add more enc key size check
https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/19921189d442

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html