Hello:
This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:19:22 +0800 you wrote:
> Because both MT7920 and MT7921 use the same chip ID.
> We use the 8th bit of fw_flavor to distingush MT7920.
> The original patch made a mistake to check whole fw_flavor,
> that makes the condition both true (dev_id == 0x7961 && fw_flavor),
> and makes MT7921 flow wrong.
>
> In this patch, we correct the flow to get the 8th bit value for MT7920.
> And the patch is verified pass with both MT7920 and MT7921.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921
https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/263296438807
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On 16.04.24 17:10, [email protected] wrote:
>
> This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
> by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>:
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:19:22 +0800 you wrote:
>> Because both MT7920 and MT7921 use the same chip ID.
>> We use the 8th bit of fw_flavor to distingush MT7920.
>> The original patch made a mistake to check whole fw_flavor,
>> that makes the condition both true (dev_id == 0x7961 && fw_flavor),
>> and makes MT7921 flow wrong.
>>
>> In this patch, we correct the flow to get the 8th bit value for MT7920.
>> And the patch is verified pass with both MT7920 and MT7921.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
> - Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921
> https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/263296438807
Hi! 6.9 is only days close and this is fixing a 6.9 regression, so allow
me to quickly ask: do you still plan to submit this for mainline merge
soon? Or did you already and I just missed it? Ciao, Thorsten