The msft_set_filter_enable() command was using the deprecated
hci_request mechanism rather than hci_sync. This caused the warning error:
hci0: HCI_REQ-0xfcf0
Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <[email protected]>
---
net/bluetooth/msft.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
index bee6a4c656be..bf5cee48916c 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
@@ -743,17 +743,12 @@ __u64 msft_get_features(struct hci_dev *hdev)
}
static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
- u8 status, u16 opcode,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ void *user_data,
+ u8 status)
{
- struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp;
- struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *rp;
+ struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp = user_data;
struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
- rp = (struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *)skb->data;
- if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
- return;
-
/* Error 0x0C would be returned if the filter enabled status is
* already set to whatever we were trying to set.
* Although the default state should be disabled, some controller set
@@ -766,7 +761,6 @@ static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
- cp = hci_sent_cmd_data(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode);
msft->filter_enabled = cp->enable;
if (status == 0x0C)
@@ -804,31 +798,23 @@ int msft_remove_monitor(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct adv_monitor *monitor)
return msft_remove_monitor_sync(hdev, monitor);
}
-void msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(struct hci_request *req, bool enable)
-{
- struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
- struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
-
- cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
- cp.enable = enable;
-
- hci_req_add(req, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp);
-}
-
int msft_set_filter_enable(struct hci_dev *hdev, bool enable)
{
- struct hci_request req;
+ struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
int err;
if (!msft)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
- msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(&req, enable);
- err = hci_req_run_skb(&req, msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb);
+ cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
+ cp.enable = enable;
+ err = __hci_cmd_sync_status(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp,
+ HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+
+ msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(hdev, &cp, err);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
bool msft_curve_validity(struct hci_dev *hdev)
--
2.38.1
Hi Mateusz,
Please note that this is UNTESTED, hence the RFC tag. I don't have any
code that exercises this particular part of the code, but if it works,
it should solve your:
Bluetooth: hci0: HCI_REQ-0xfcf0
error.
--Brian
On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 15:02 -0700, Brian Gix wrote:
> The msft_set_filter_enable() command was using the deprecated
> hci_request mechanism rather than hci_sync. This caused the warning
> error:
> hci0: HCI_REQ-0xfcf0
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/msft.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> index bee6a4c656be..bf5cee48916c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> @@ -743,17 +743,12 @@ __u64 msft_get_features(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> }
>
> static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct
> hci_dev *hdev,
> - u8 status, u16
> opcode,
> - struct sk_buff
> *skb)
> + void
> *user_data,
> + u8 status)
> {
> - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp;
> - struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *rp;
> + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp =
> user_data;
> struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
>
> - rp = (struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable
> *)skb->data;
> - if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> - return;
> -
> /* Error 0x0C would be returned if the filter enabled status
> is
> * already set to whatever we were trying to set.
> * Although the default state should be disabled, some
> controller set
> @@ -766,7 +761,6 @@ static void
> msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>
> hci_dev_lock(hdev);
>
> - cp = hci_sent_cmd_data(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode);
> msft->filter_enabled = cp->enable;
>
> if (status == 0x0C)
> @@ -804,31 +798,23 @@ int msft_remove_monitor(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> struct adv_monitor *monitor)
> return msft_remove_monitor_sync(hdev, monitor);
> }
>
> -void msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(struct hci_request *req, bool
> enable)
> -{
> - struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> -
> - cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> - cp.enable = enable;
> -
> - hci_req_add(req, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> -}
> -
> int msft_set_filter_enable(struct hci_dev *hdev, bool enable)
> {
> - struct hci_request req;
> + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
> int err;
>
> if (!msft)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> - msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(&req, enable);
> - err = hci_req_run_skb(&req,
> msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb);
> + cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> + cp.enable = enable;
> + err = __hci_cmd_sync_status(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode,
> sizeof(cp), &cp,
> + HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(hdev, &cp, err);
>
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> bool msft_curve_validity(struct hci_dev *hdev)
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 1.37 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.79 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.73 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 36.28 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 32.91 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS 48.56 seconds
TestRunner: Setup PASS 547.33 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 18.57 seconds
TestRunner: iso-tester PASS 17.49 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 6.79 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 111.09 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 10.77 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 10.26 seconds
TestRunner: ioctl-tester PASS 11.48 seconds
TestRunner: mesh-tester PASS 8.26 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 9.99 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 6.98 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Hi Brian,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:02 PM Brian Gix <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The msft_set_filter_enable() command was using the deprecated
> hci_request mechanism rather than hci_sync. This caused the warning error:
> hci0: HCI_REQ-0xfcf0
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/msft.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> index bee6a4c656be..bf5cee48916c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> @@ -743,17 +743,12 @@ __u64 msft_get_features(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> }
>
> static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> - u8 status, u16 opcode,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + void *user_data,
> + u8 status)
> {
> - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp;
> - struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *rp;
> + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp = user_data;
> struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
>
> - rp = (struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *)skb->data;
> - if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> - return;
> -
> /* Error 0x0C would be returned if the filter enabled status is
> * already set to whatever we were trying to set.
> * Although the default state should be disabled, some controller set
> @@ -766,7 +761,6 @@ static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>
> hci_dev_lock(hdev);
>
> - cp = hci_sent_cmd_data(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode);
> msft->filter_enabled = cp->enable;
>
> if (status == 0x0C)
> @@ -804,31 +798,23 @@ int msft_remove_monitor(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct adv_monitor *monitor)
> return msft_remove_monitor_sync(hdev, monitor);
> }
>
> -void msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(struct hci_request *req, bool enable)
> -{
> - struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> -
> - cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> - cp.enable = enable;
> -
> - hci_req_add(req, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> -}
> -
> int msft_set_filter_enable(struct hci_dev *hdev, bool enable)
> {
> - struct hci_request req;
> + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
> int err;
>
> if (!msft)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> - msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(&req, enable);
> - err = hci_req_run_skb(&req, msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb);
> + cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> + cp.enable = enable;
> + err = __hci_cmd_sync_status(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp,
> + HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(hdev, &cp, err);
Except if this function is only supposed to be called for a safe
context (which can block) we should actually use hci_cmd_sync_queue.
>
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> bool msft_curve_validity(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> --
> 2.38.1
>
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 16:25 -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:02 PM Brian Gix <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > The msft_set_filter_enable() command was using the deprecated
> > hci_request mechanism rather than hci_sync. This caused the warning
> > error:
> > hci0: HCI_REQ-0xfcf0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > net/bluetooth/msft.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> > index bee6a4c656be..bf5cee48916c 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> > @@ -743,17 +743,12 @@ __u64 msft_get_features(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> > }
> >
> > static void msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct
> > hci_dev *hdev,
> > - u8 status,
> > u16 opcode,
> > - struct
> > sk_buff *skb)
> > + void
> > *user_data,
> > + u8 status)
> > {
> > - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp;
> > - struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *rp;
> > + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable *cp =
> > user_data;
> > struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
> >
> > - rp = (struct msft_rp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable
> > *)skb->data;
> > - if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> > - return;
> > -
> > /* Error 0x0C would be returned if the filter enabled
> > status is
> > * already set to whatever we were trying to set.
> > * Although the default state should be disabled, some
> > controller set
> > @@ -766,7 +761,6 @@ static void
> > msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> >
> > hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> >
> > - cp = hci_sent_cmd_data(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode);
> > msft->filter_enabled = cp->enable;
> >
> > if (status == 0x0C)
> > @@ -804,31 +798,23 @@ int msft_remove_monitor(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> > struct adv_monitor *monitor)
> > return msft_remove_monitor_sync(hdev, monitor);
> > }
> >
> > -void msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(struct hci_request *req, bool
> > enable)
> > -{
> > - struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> > - struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> > -
> > - cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> > - cp.enable = enable;
> > -
> > - hci_req_add(req, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> > -}
> > -
> > int msft_set_filter_enable(struct hci_dev *hdev, bool enable)
> > {
> > - struct hci_request req;
> > + struct msft_cp_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable cp;
> > struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
> > int err;
> >
> > if (!msft)
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > - hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> > - msft_req_add_set_filter_enable(&req, enable);
> > - err = hci_req_run_skb(&req,
> > msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb);
> > + cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_SET_ADVERTISEMENT_FILTER_ENABLE;
> > + cp.enable = enable;
> > + err = __hci_cmd_sync_status(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode,
> > sizeof(cp), &cp,
> > + HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
> > +
> > + msft_le_set_advertisement_filter_enable_cb(hdev, &cp, err);
>
> Except if this function is only supposed to be called for a safe
> context (which can block) we should actually use hci_cmd_sync_queue.
This call is made from msft_do_open() which has one call:
from hci_dev_init_sync(), which also calls aosp_do_open().
From within aosp_do_open(), we are also calling __hci_cmd_sync(), and
if we assume that that has been tested and is working, then making what
is essentially the identical call here should be fine.
Otherwise, we should also recode aosp_do_open to use the
hci_cmd_sync_queue as well.
> >
> > - return err;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > bool msft_curve_validity(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
>
>
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.77 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.38 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 41.72 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 38.33 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 507.69 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 18.20 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 18.34 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.43 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 121.16 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 10.91 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 10.17 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 11.67 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 8.12 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 10.05 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.88 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 38.73 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.59 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.28 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.09 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 34.10 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 30.42 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 420.82 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 15.66 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 14.89 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.26 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 106.33 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.09 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.65 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 9.89 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.66 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.39 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.53 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 30.62 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.66 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.33 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.11 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 34.17 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 29.89 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 420.10 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 16.04 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.41 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.39 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 104.21 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.14 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.54 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 9.80 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.65 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.38 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.65 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 30.65 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.67 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.33 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 34.29 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 30.36 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 420.04 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 15.69 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.03 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.35 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 103.66 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.17 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.64 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 9.88 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.70 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.43 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.64 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 31.45 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.75 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.38 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 38.69 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 34.79 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 489.22 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 17.50 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 17.58 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 6.30 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 118.97 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 10.72 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 10.03 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 11.72 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 8.04 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 9.84 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 6.84 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 37.34 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.67 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.33 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 33.73 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 29.94 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 418.97 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 16.05 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.06 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.36 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 104.08 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.08 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.57 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 9.68 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.72 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.43 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.54 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 30.81 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.70 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.35 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 33.82 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 30.51 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 425.75 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 16.35 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.92 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.60 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 105.95 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.50 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.96 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.28 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.99 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.75 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.89 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 31.59 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.69 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.34 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.12 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 33.65 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 30.66 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 425.34 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 16.09 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.58 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.55 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 106.91 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.47 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.97 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 10.18 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 7.08 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.77 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.83 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 31.51 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690652
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.60 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.29 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.10 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 33.72 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 30.16 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 420.94 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 15.68 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 15.07 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 5.26 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 103.94 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 9.08 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 8.59 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 9.86 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 6.69 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 8.41 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 5.52 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 31.24 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth