This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct hci_dev_list_req" and this
structure ends in a flexible array:
struct hci_dev_list_req {
[...]
struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */
};
the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
do the arithmetic instead of the calculation "size + count * size" in
the kzalloc() and copy_to_user() functions.
At the same time, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang
of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
__counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via
CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
In this case, it is important to note that the logic needs a little
refactoring to ensure that the "dev_num" member is initialized before
the first access to the flex array. Specifically, add the assignment
before the list_for_each_entry() loop.
Also remove the "size" variable as it is no longer needed and refactor
the list_for_each_entry() loop to use dr[n] instead of (dr + n).
This way, the code is more readable, idiomatic and safer.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
modified manually.
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <[email protected]>
---
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h | 2 +-
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 15 ++++++---------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h
index 9949870f7d78..13e8cd4414a1 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct hci_dev_req {
struct hci_dev_list_req {
__u16 dev_num;
- struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */
+ struct hci_dev_req dev_req[] __counted_by(dev_num);
};
struct hci_conn_list_req {
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
index adfd53a9fcd4..cae8a67bcd62 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ int hci_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
struct hci_dev *hdev;
struct hci_dev_list_req *dl;
struct hci_dev_req *dr;
- int n = 0, size, err;
+ int n = 0, err;
__u16 dev_num;
if (get_user(dev_num, (__u16 __user *) arg))
@@ -846,12 +846,11 @@ int hci_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
if (!dev_num || dev_num > (PAGE_SIZE * 2) / sizeof(*dr))
return -EINVAL;
- size = sizeof(*dl) + dev_num * sizeof(*dr);
-
- dl = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ dl = kzalloc(struct_size(dl, dev_req, dev_num), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dl)
return -ENOMEM;
+ dl->dev_num = dev_num;
dr = dl->dev_req;
read_lock(&hci_dev_list_lock);
@@ -865,8 +864,8 @@ int hci_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_AUTO_OFF))
flags &= ~BIT(HCI_UP);
- (dr + n)->dev_id = hdev->id;
- (dr + n)->dev_opt = flags;
+ dr[n].dev_id = hdev->id;
+ dr[n].dev_opt = flags;
if (++n >= dev_num)
break;
@@ -874,9 +873,7 @@ int hci_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
read_unlock(&hci_dev_list_lock);
dl->dev_num = n;
- size = sizeof(*dl) + n * sizeof(*dr);
-
- err = copy_to_user(arg, dl, size);
+ err = copy_to_user(arg, dl, struct_size(dl, dev_req, n));
kfree(dl);
return err ? -EFAULT : 0;
--
2.25.1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=852655
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.78 seconds
GitLint FAIL 0.49 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 0.10 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 29.77 seconds
CheckAllWarning PASS 32.45 seconds
CheckSparse PASS 39.05 seconds
CheckSmatch FAIL 34.54 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 29.03 seconds
TestRunnerSetup PASS 520.38 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 20.58 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester FAIL 33.47 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 4.74 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 110.56 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 7.28 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 15.00 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 7.65 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 5.77 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 6.71 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 4.87 seconds
IncrementalBuild PASS 28.07 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: GitLint - FAIL
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
Bluetooth: hci_core: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
WARNING: I3 - ignore-body-lines: gitlint will be switching from using Python regex 'match' (match beginning) to 'search' (match anywhere) semantics. Please review your ignore-body-lines.regex option accordingly. To remove this warning, set general.regex-style-search=True. More details: https://jorisroovers.github.io/gitlint/configuration/#regex-style-search
10: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): " [...]"
11: B3 Line contains hard tab characters (\t): " struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */"
37: B1 Line exceeds max length (117>80): "Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]"
##############################
Test: CheckSmatch - FAIL
Desc: Run smatch tool with source
Output:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: net/bluetooth/hci_core.o] Error 139
make[4]: *** Deleting file 'net/bluetooth/hci_core.o'
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: net/bluetooth] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: net] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: drivers/bluetooth/bcm203x.o] Error 139
make[4]: *** Deleting file 'drivers/bluetooth/bcm203x.o'
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: drivers/bluetooth] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: drivers] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/github/workspace/src/src/Makefile:1919: .] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
##############################
Test: TestRunner_iso-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run iso-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 122, Passed: 121 (99.2%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
ISO Connect2 Suspend - Success Failed 4.230 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:17:06PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
>
> As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct hci_dev_list_req" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
>
> struct hci_dev_list_req {
> [...]
> struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */
> };
>
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the calculation "size + count * size" in
> the kzalloc() and copy_to_user() functions.
>
> At the same time, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang
> of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
> __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via
> CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
> strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
>
> In this case, it is important to note that the logic needs a little
> refactoring to ensure that the "dev_num" member is initialized before
> the first access to the flex array. Specifically, add the assignment
> before the list_for_each_entry() loop.
>
> Also remove the "size" variable as it is no longer needed and refactor
> the list_for_each_entry() loop to use dr[n] instead of (dr + n).
>
> This way, the code is more readable, idiomatic and safer.
>
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
> modified manually.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
>
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <[email protected]>
Looks right to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
--
Kees Cook
Hi Eric,
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:08 PM Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:17:06PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> > functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
> >
> > As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct hci_dev_list_req" and this
> > structure ends in a flexible array:
> >
> > struct hci_dev_list_req {
> > [...]
> > struct hci_dev_req dev_req[]; /* hci_dev_req structures */
> > };
> >
> > the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> > do the arithmetic instead of the calculation "size + count * size" in
> > the kzalloc() and copy_to_user() functions.
> >
> > At the same time, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang
> > of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
> > __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for
> > strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
> >
> > In this case, it is important to note that the logic needs a little
> > refactoring to ensure that the "dev_num" member is initialized before
> > the first access to the flex array. Specifically, add the assignment
> > before the list_for_each_entry() loop.
> >
> > Also remove the "size" variable as it is no longer needed and refactor
> > the list_for_each_entry() loop to use dr[n] instead of (dr + n).
Have the change above split on its own patch.
> > This way, the code is more readable, idiomatic and safer.
> >
> > This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle, and audited and
> > modified manually.
> >
> > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <[email protected]>
>
> Looks right to me. Thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz