From: Hilda Wu <[email protected]>
This patch adds a data structure for btrealtek object, and the
definition of vendor behavior flags. It also adds macros to set/test/get
the flags.
Signed-off-by: Hilda Wu <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v4:
- Since the original 0002 patch has no dependency with this 0001 patch.
So let the 0002 patch submit another.
Changes in v3:
- Update private flag.
Changes in v2:
- Set the proper priv_size to hci_alloc_dev_priv().
- Separate commits for functions.
---
---
drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.h
index 2c441bda390a..ebf0101c959b 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.h
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.h
@@ -47,6 +47,27 @@ struct rtl_vendor_config {
struct rtl_vendor_config_entry entry[];
} __packed;
+enum {
+ REALTEK_ALT6_CONTINUOUS_TX_CHIP,
+
+ __REALTEK_NUM_FLAGS,
+};
+
+struct btrealtek_data {
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, __REALTEK_NUM_FLAGS);
+};
+
+#define btrealtek_set_flag(hdev, nr) \
+ do { \
+ struct btrealtek_data *realtek = hci_get_priv((hdev)); \
+ set_bit((nr), realtek->flags); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define btrealtek_get_flag(hdev) \
+ (((struct btrealtek_data *)hci_get_priv(hdev))->flags)
+
+#define btrealtek_test_flag(hdev, nr) test_bit((nr), btrealtek_get_flag(hdev))
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_RTL)
struct btrtl_device_info *btrtl_initialize(struct hci_dev *hdev,
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 271963805a38..4243936c0583 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -3755,6 +3755,9 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
/* Override the rx handlers */
data->recv_event = btusb_recv_event_intel;
data->recv_bulk = btusb_recv_bulk_intel;
+ } else if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK) {
+ /* Allocate extra space for Realtek device */
+ priv_size += sizeof(struct btrealtek_data);
}
data->recv_acl = hci_recv_frame;
--
2.17.1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=683169
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 3.08 seconds
GitLint FAIL 1.68 seconds
SubjectPrefix PASS 1.21 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 39.08 seconds
BuildKernel32 PASS 35.06 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS 58.68 seconds
TestRunner: Setup PASS 581.82 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 19.08 seconds
TestRunner: iso-tester PASS 19.65 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 7.43 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 118.61 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 11.81 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 10.97 seconds
TestRunner: ioctl-tester PASS 12.64 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 10.99 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 7.79 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: GitLint - FAIL - 1.68 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint
[v4,2/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Ignore zero length of USB packets on ALT 6 for specific chip
1: T1 Title exceeds max length (87>80): "[v4,2/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Ignore zero length of USB packets on ALT 6 for specific chip"
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth