2012-02-21 14:34:18

by Andrei Emeltchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC] Bluetooth: Add set_err to state_change callback

From: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>

There are several places in the code where l2cap_state_change and
l2cap_chan_set_err used together. With combining them we remove
socket lock in l2cap_send_disconn_req and simplify code in couple
of other places with a price of adding extra parameter err to
state_change.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>
---
include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 3 +-
net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 9 +++++-
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
index ff56daf..2450b7c 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
@@ -511,7 +511,8 @@ struct l2cap_ops {
int (*send) (struct l2cap_chan *chan,
struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, u32 priority);
void (*close) (void *data);
- void (*state_change) (void *data, int state);
+ void (*state_change) (void *data, int state,
+ int err);
struct sk_buff *(*alloc_skb) (struct l2cap_chan *chan,
unsigned long len, int nb, int *err);

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
index 9870134..f84ee02 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
@@ -200,32 +200,32 @@ static u16 l2cap_alloc_cid(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
return 0;
}

-static void __l2cap_state_change(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int state)
+static void __l2cap_state_change(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int state, int err)
{
BT_DBG("chan %p %s -> %s", chan, state_to_string(chan->state),
state_to_string(state));

chan->state = state;
- chan->ops->state_change(chan->data, state);
+ chan->ops->state_change(chan->data, state, err);
}

-static void l2cap_state_change(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int state)
+static void l2cap_state_change(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int state, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = chan->sk;

lock_sock(sk);
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, state);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, state, err);
release_sock(sk);
}

-static inline void __l2cap_chan_set_err(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
+void __l2cap_chan_set_err(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = chan->sk;

sk->sk_err = err;
}

-static inline void l2cap_chan_set_err(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
+static void l2cap_chan_set_err(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = chan->sk;

@@ -392,11 +392,9 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)

parent = bt_sk(sk)->parent;

- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CLOSED);
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CLOSED, err);

- if (err)
- __l2cap_chan_set_err(chan, err);
+ sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);

if (parent) {
bt_accept_unlink(sk);
@@ -461,7 +459,7 @@ void l2cap_chan_close(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int reason)
lock_sock(sk);
l2cap_chan_cleanup_listen(sk);

- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CLOSED);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CLOSED, 0);
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
release_sock(sk);
break;
@@ -487,7 +485,7 @@ void l2cap_chan_close(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int reason)
result = L2CAP_CR_SEC_BLOCK;
else
result = L2CAP_CR_BAD_PSM;
- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN, 0);

rsp.scid = cpu_to_le16(chan->dcid);
rsp.dcid = cpu_to_le16(chan->scid);
@@ -736,7 +734,6 @@ static inline int l2cap_mode_supported(__u8 mode, __u32 feat_mask)

static void l2cap_send_disconn_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
{
- struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
struct l2cap_disconn_req req;

if (!conn)
@@ -753,10 +750,7 @@ static void l2cap_send_disconn_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_chan *c
l2cap_send_cmd(conn, l2cap_get_ident(conn),
L2CAP_DISCONN_REQ, sizeof(req), &req);

- lock_sock(sk);
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN);
- __l2cap_chan_set_err(chan, err);
- release_sock(sk);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN, err);
}

/* ---- L2CAP connections ---- */
@@ -820,7 +814,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_start(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);

} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG, 0);
rsp.result = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_CR_SUCCESS);
rsp.status = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO);
}
@@ -924,7 +918,7 @@ static void l2cap_le_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)

__set_chan_timer(chan, sk->sk_sndtimeo);

- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);

clean:
@@ -945,7 +939,7 @@ static void l2cap_chan_ready(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
chan->conf_state = 0;
__clear_chan_timer(chan);

- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);

if (parent)
@@ -980,7 +974,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
__clear_chan_timer(chan);
lock_sock(sk);
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
release_sock(sk);

@@ -1264,14 +1258,14 @@ int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid, bdaddr_t *d
l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan);
l2cap_chan_lock(chan);

- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT, 0);
__set_chan_timer(chan, sk->sk_sndtimeo);

if (hcon->state == BT_CONNECTED) {
if (chan->chan_type != L2CAP_CHAN_CONN_ORIENTED) {
__clear_chan_timer(chan);
if (l2cap_chan_check_security(chan))
- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);
} else
l2cap_do_start(chan);
}
@@ -2721,22 +2715,22 @@ static inline int l2cap_connect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hd
if (conn->info_state & L2CAP_INFO_FEAT_MASK_REQ_DONE) {
if (l2cap_chan_check_security(chan)) {
if (bt_sk(sk)->defer_setup) {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2, 0);
result = L2CAP_CR_PEND;
status = L2CAP_CS_AUTHOR_PEND;
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG, 0);
result = L2CAP_CR_SUCCESS;
status = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
}
} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2, 0);
result = L2CAP_CR_PEND;
status = L2CAP_CS_AUTHEN_PEND;
}
} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2, 0);
result = L2CAP_CR_PEND;
status = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
}
@@ -2816,7 +2810,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_connect_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hd

switch (result) {
case L2CAP_CR_SUCCESS:
- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG, 0);
chan->ident = 0;
chan->dcid = dcid;
clear_bit(CONF_CONNECT_PEND, &chan->conf_state);
@@ -2928,7 +2922,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr
if (test_bit(CONF_INPUT_DONE, &chan->conf_state)) {
set_default_fcs(chan);

- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);

chan->next_tx_seq = 0;
chan->expected_tx_seq = 0;
@@ -3060,7 +3054,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr
if (test_bit(CONF_OUTPUT_DONE, &chan->conf_state)) {
set_default_fcs(chan);

- l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED, 0);
chan->next_tx_seq = 0;
chan->expected_tx_seq = 0;
skb_queue_head_init(&chan->tx_q);
@@ -4657,12 +4651,12 @@ int l2cap_security_cfm(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 status, u8 encrypt)
if (parent)
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONFIG, 0);
res = L2CAP_CR_SUCCESS;
stat = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
}
} else {
- __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN);
+ __l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN, 0);
__set_chan_timer(chan,
msecs_to_jiffies(L2CAP_DISC_TIMEOUT));
res = L2CAP_CR_SEC_BLOCK;
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
index e2fc24b..ae15d7a 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
static const struct proto_ops l2cap_sock_ops;
static void l2cap_sock_init(struct sock *sk, struct sock *parent);
static struct sock *l2cap_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int proto, gfp_t prio);
+void __l2cap_chan_set_err(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err);

static int l2cap_sock_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int alen)
{
@@ -916,11 +917,17 @@ static void l2cap_sock_close_cb(void *data)
l2cap_sock_kill(sk);
}

-static void l2cap_sock_state_change_cb(void *data, int state)
+static void l2cap_sock_state_change_cb(void *data, int state, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = data;

sk->sk_state = state;
+
+ if (err) {
+ struct l2cap_chan *chan = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan;
+
+ __l2cap_chan_set_err(chan, err);
+ }
}

static struct sk_buff *l2cap_sock_alloc_skb_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
--
1.7.9



2012-02-22 08:00:21

by Andrei Emeltchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: Add set_err to state_change callback

Hi Ulisses,

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:42:33PM -0200, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>
> >
> > There are several places in the code where l2cap_state_change and
> > l2cap_chan_set_err used together. With combining them we remove
> > socket lock in l2cap_send_disconn_req and simplify code in couple
> > of other places with a price of adding extra parameter err to
> > state_change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > ?include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | ? ?3 +-
> > ?net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c ? ?| ? 58 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > ?net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c ? ?| ? ?9 +++++-
> > ?3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> While I see the benefit of removing function calls and also some code
> I'm not sure about this change now. We need to think of moving sock
> handling to l2cap_sock.c and for that we may have to work more on
> l2cap_ops indeed. However, we need to change ERTM state machine
> handling first, I'd say.

Yes, the main idea is to remove those socket operations to l2cap_ops so
that other socket-less protocols would override it.

Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko


2012-02-21 17:42:33

by Ulisses Furquim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: Add set_err to state_change callback

Hi Andrei,

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>
>
> There are several places in the code where l2cap_state_change and
> l2cap_chan_set_err used together. With combining them we remove
> socket lock in l2cap_send_disconn_req and simplify code in couple
> of other places with a price of adding extra parameter err to
> state_change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> ?include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | ? ?3 +-
> ?net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c ? ?| ? 58 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> ?net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c ? ?| ? ?9 +++++-
> ?3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

While I see the benefit of removing function calls and also some code
I'm not sure about this change now. We need to think of moving sock
handling to l2cap_sock.c and for that we may have to work more on
l2cap_ops indeed. However, we need to change ERTM state machine
handling first, I'd say.

Regards,

--
Ulisses Furquim
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://profusion.mobi
Mobile: +55 19 9250 0942
Skype: ulissesffs