From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
In some cases, LE controllers, this can cause errors due to scan/inquiry
being active.
To fix this instead of immediately attempting to pair wait until
discovery is properly stopped and only then proceed with bonding.
---
Still RFC because I could only test against controllers that used to
work without this patch.
src/adapter.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/adapter.c b/src/adapter.c
index f922876..043ca02 100644
--- a/src/adapter.c
+++ b/src/adapter.c
@@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ struct service_auth {
struct btd_adapter *adapter;
};
+struct pending_bonding {
+ bdaddr_t bdaddr;
+ uint8_t addr_type;
+ uint8_t io_cap;
+};
+
struct btd_adapter {
uint16_t dev_id;
gboolean up;
@@ -137,6 +143,7 @@ struct btd_adapter {
guint discov_id; /* Discovery timer */
gboolean discovering; /* Discovery active */
gboolean discov_suspended; /* Discovery suspended */
+ struct pending_bonding *bonding;/* Pending device bonding */
guint auto_timeout_id; /* Automatic connections timeout */
sdp_list_t *services; /* Services associated to adapter */
@@ -498,6 +505,10 @@ static void stop_discovery(struct btd_adapter *adapter)
/* Reset if suspended, otherwise remove timer (software scheduler)
* or request inquiry to stop */
if (adapter->discov_suspended) {
+ if (adapter->bonding != NULL) {
+ g_free(adapter->bonding);
+ adapter->bonding = NULL;
+ }
adapter->discov_suspended = FALSE;
return;
}
@@ -2551,7 +2562,20 @@ void adapter_set_discovering(struct btd_adapter *adapter,
g_slist_free_full(adapter->oor_devices, dev_info_free);
adapter->oor_devices = g_slist_copy(adapter->found_devices);
- if (!adapter_has_discov_sessions(adapter) || adapter->discov_suspended)
+ if (adapter->discov_suspended) {
+ if (adapter->bonding != NULL) {
+ adapter_ops->create_bonding(adapter->dev_id,
+ &adapter->bonding->bdaddr,
+ adapter->bonding->addr_type,
+ adapter->bonding->io_cap);
+ g_free(adapter->bonding);
+ adapter->bonding = NULL;
+ return;
+ } else
+ adapter->discov_suspended = FALSE;
+ }
+
+ if (!adapter_has_discov_sessions(adapter))
return;
DBG("hci%u restarting discovery, disc_sessions %u", adapter->dev_id,
@@ -2560,10 +2584,10 @@ void adapter_set_discovering(struct btd_adapter *adapter,
adapter->discov_id = g_idle_add(discovery_cb, adapter);
}
-static void suspend_discovery(struct btd_adapter *adapter)
+static int suspend_discovery(struct btd_adapter *adapter)
{
if (adapter->disc_sessions == NULL || adapter->discov_suspended)
- return;
+ return -EALREADY;
DBG("Suspending discovery");
@@ -2579,6 +2603,8 @@ static void suspend_discovery(struct btd_adapter *adapter)
adapter->discov_id = 0;
} else
adapter_ops->stop_discovery(adapter->dev_id);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int found_device_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
@@ -3530,9 +3556,19 @@ int btd_adapter_set_did(struct btd_adapter *adapter, uint16_t vendor,
int adapter_create_bonding(struct btd_adapter *adapter, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
uint8_t addr_type, uint8_t io_cap)
{
- suspend_discovery(adapter);
- return adapter_ops->create_bonding(adapter->dev_id, bdaddr,
- addr_type, io_cap);
+ if (suspend_discovery(adapter) == -EALREADY)
+ return adapter_ops->create_bonding(adapter->dev_id, bdaddr,
+ addr_type, io_cap);
+
+ if (adapter->bonding != NULL)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ adapter->bonding = g_new0(struct pending_bonding, 1);
+ bacpy(&adapter->bonding->bdaddr, bdaddr);
+ adapter->bonding->addr_type = addr_type;
+ adapter->bonding->io_cap = io_cap;
+
+ return 0;
}
int adapter_cancel_bonding(struct btd_adapter *adapter, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
--
1.7.10.4
Hello,
hci sendmsg() system call is able to execute properly .However hci
recvmsg() will be in blocked state not able to receive any data in the
other end . How to send & receive the message using HCI RAW socket.
Please help,
Thanks & Regards ,
Deepthi Elizabeth P V
>
Hi Joao,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Joao Paulo Rechi Vita
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Luiz,
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>>
>> In some cases, LE controllers, this can cause errors due to scan/inquiry
>> being active.
>>
>> To fix this instead of immediately attempting to pair wait until
>> discovery is properly stopped and only then proceed with bonding.
>> ---
>> Still RFC because I could only test against controllers that used to
>> work without this patch.
>>
>
> Claudio and I are currently working to support the General Connection
> Procedure for LE connections, which will serialize the discovery and
> LE connect commands. In other words, only one connect or discovery
> command will be sent to the kernel at a given time. We'll probably
> send an RFC on this code this week.
Sounds like a better idea.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hello Luiz,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>
> In some cases, LE controllers, this can cause errors due to scan/inquiry
> being active.
>
> To fix this instead of immediately attempting to pair wait until
> discovery is properly stopped and only then proceed with bonding.
> ---
> Still RFC because I could only test against controllers that used to
> work without this patch.
>
Claudio and I are currently working to support the General Connection
Procedure for LE connections, which will serialize the discovery and
LE connect commands. In other words, only one connect or discovery
command will be sent to the kernel at a given time. We'll probably
send an RFC on this code this week.
--
João Paulo Rechi Vita
Openbossa Labs - INdT
Hi Luiz,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>
> In some cases, LE controllers, this can cause errors due to scan/inquiry
> being active.
Can you provide more background on which controllers did you see this issue?
Also, would it be appropriate to use the "LE Read Supported States"
HCI command to check the supported controller states on kernel and
make this check on kernel instead?
I suppose this will cause pairing delays even for controllers which do
not have this issue.
>
> To fix this instead of immediately attempting to pair wait until
> discovery is properly stopped and only then proceed with bonding.
> ---
> Still RFC because I could only test against controllers that used to
> work without this patch.
Regards,
--
Anderson Lizardo
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT
Manaus - Brazil