Hi! Abhishek,
My bad! I should check the code base is the latest and follow it.
I'll submit the v2 patch. Thanks for your review.
BRs,
Max
-----Original Message-----
From: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 12:41 PM
To: Max Chou <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>; Johan Hedberg <[email protected]>; Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>; Bluez mailing list <[email protected]>; LKML <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Hilda Wu <[email protected]>; KidmanLee <[email protected]>; Shyh-In Hwang <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btrtl: Enable WBS for the specific Realtek devices
Hi Max,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:28 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Max Chou <[email protected]>
>
> By this change, it will enable WBS supported on the specific Realtek
> BT devices, such as RTL8822C and RTL8852A.
> In the future, it's able to maintain what the Realtek devices support
> WBS here.
>
> Tested-by: Hilda Wu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Max Chou <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> index 24f03a1f8d57..835819c47ae6 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,19 @@
> .hci_ver = (hciv), \
> .hci_bus = (bus)
>
> +enum btrtl_chip_id {
> + CHIP_ID_8723A, /* index 0 for RTL8723A*/
> + CHIP_ID_8723B, /* index 1 for RTL8723B*/
> + CHIP_ID_8821A, /* index 2 for RTL8821A*/
> + CHIP_ID_8761A, /* index 3 for RTL8761A*/
> + CHIP_ID_8822B = 8, /* index 8 for RTL8822B */
> + CHIP_ID_8723D, /* index 9 for RTL8723D */
> + CHIP_ID_8821C, /* index 10 for RTL8821C */
> + CHIP_ID_8822C = 13, /* index 13 for RTL8822C */
> + CHIP_ID_8761B, /* index 14 for RTL8761B */
> + CHIP_ID_8852A = 18, /* index 18 for RTL8852A */
> +};
> +
> struct id_table {
> __u16 match_flags;
> __u16 lmp_subver;
> @@ -58,6 +71,7 @@ struct btrtl_device_info {
> u8 *cfg_data;
> int cfg_len;
> bool drop_fw;
> + int project_id;
> };
>
> static const struct id_table ic_id_table[] = { @@ -307,8 +321,10 @@
> static int rtlbt_parse_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>
> /* Find project_id in table */
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(project_id_to_lmp_subver); i++) {
> - if (project_id == project_id_to_lmp_subver[i].id)
> + if (project_id == project_id_to_lmp_subver[i].id) {
> + btrtl_dev->project_id = project_id;
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(project_id_to_lmp_subver)) { @@ -725,12
> +741,16 @@ int btrtl_setup_realtek(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> /* Enable central-peripheral role (able to create new connections with
> * an existing connection in slave role).
> */
> - switch (btrtl_dev->ic_info->lmp_subver) {
> - case RTL_ROM_LMP_8822B:
> + /* Enable WBS supported for the specific Realtek devices. */
> + switch (btrtl_dev->project_id) {
> + case CHIP_ID_8822C:
> + case CHIP_ID_8852A:
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_VALID_LE_STATES, &hdev->quirks);
> + set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_WIDEBAND_SPEECH_SUPPORTED,
> + &hdev->quirks);
> break;
> default:
> rtl_dev_dbg(hdev, "Central-peripheral role not
> enabled.");
> + rtl_dev_dbg(hdev, "WBS supported not enabled.");
> break;
> }
There is a null-check on btrtl_dev->ic_info right above this switch statement (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git/commit/?id=b649813eadbc062d8682f7a20aa025275707dd1f).
Is this still necessary with this change? (Sorry, I missed this during our previous review).
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Abhishek
------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.