Hello,
In testing NFSv4, I found that this lock test script fails with EIO:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$|=1;
use Fcntl qw(:DEFAULT :flock);
open(IN, "< locktest.pl") or die "open: $!";
print "Locking...\n";
flock(IN,LOCK_EX) or die "flock $filename: $!";
print "Locked.\n";
sleep(4);
print "Unlocking...\n";
close(IN);
exit(0);
This just locks itself (assuming it's called locktest.pl). This works
fine over NFSv3, but with NFSv4, I'm seeing:
flock(3, LOCK_EX) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
tcpdump and NFS debugging shows status "10038", which as far as I can
tell is "NFS4ERR_OPENMODE".
Output from the server with nfsd_debug set to 255 is below.
Server and client are 2.6.38-rc8-git5.
Simon-
[ 9018.993475] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9018.993507] nfsv4 compound op #1/1: 35 (OP_SETCLIENTID)
[ 9018.993535] NFSD: nfs4_make_rec_clidname for 10.10.52.161/10.10.52.160 tcp UNIX 0
[ 9018.993595] renewing client (clientid 4d238df3/0000000a)
[ 9018.993624] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 1 #1: 35: status 0
[ 9018.993653] nfsv4 compound returned 0
[ 9018.994389] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9018.994416] nfsv4 compound op #1/3: 36 (OP_SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM)
[ 9018.994446] NFSD: move_to_confirm nfs4_client ffff8801f28f5c00
[ 9018.994473] renewing client (clientid 4d238df3/0000000a)
[ 9018.994504] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #1: 36: status 0
[ 9018.994533] nfsv4 compound op #2/3: 24 (OP_PUTROOTFH)
[ 9018.994565] nfsd: fh_compose(exp 08:01/2 ///, ino=2)
[ 9018.994593] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #2: 24: status 0
[ 9018.994622] nfsv4 compound op #3/3: 9 (OP_GETATTR)
[ 9018.994649] nfsd: fh_verify(8: 00010001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000)
[ 9018.994724] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #3: 9: status 0
[ 9018.994753] nfsv4 compound returned 0
[ 9018.995564] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9018.995591] nfsv4 compound op #1/7: 22 (OP_PUTFH)
[ 9018.995617] nfsd: fh_verify(8: 00010001 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000)
[ 9018.995667] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #1: 22: status 0
[ 9018.995696] nfsv4 compound op #2/7: 32 (OP_SAVEFH)
[ 9018.995723] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #2: 32: status 0
[ 9018.995752] nfsv4 compound op #3/7: 18 (OP_OPEN)
[ 9018.995778] NFSD: nfsd4_open filename lockme.file op_stateowner (null)
[ 9018.995824] renewing client (clientid 4d238df3/0000000a)
[ 9018.995853] nfsd: nfsd_lookup(fh 8: 00010001 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000, lockme.file)
[ 9018.995902] nfsd: fh_verify(8: 00010001 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000)
[ 9018.995951] nfsd: fh_compose(exp 08:04/128 //lockme.file, ino=3571468)
[ 9018.995983] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9018.996038] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9018.996088] nfsd4_process_open2: stateid=(4d238df3/00015581/0001274a/00000000)
[ 9018.996134] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #3: 18: status 0
[ 9018.996164] nfsv4 compound op #4/7: 10 (OP_GETFH)
[ 9018.996191] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #4: 10: status 0
[ 9018.996220] nfsv4 compound op #5/7: 9 (OP_GETATTR)
[ 9018.996247] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9018.996300] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #5: 9: status 0
[ 9018.996329] nfsv4 compound op #6/7: 31 (OP_RESTOREFH)
[ 9018.996356] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #6: 31: status 0
[ 9018.996385] nfsv4 compound op #7/7: 9 (OP_GETATTR)
[ 9018.996411] nfsd: fh_verify(8: 00010001 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000)
[ 9018.996459] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 7 #7: 9: status 0
[ 9018.996488] nfsv4 compound returned 0
[ 9018.997318] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9018.997343] nfsv4 compound op #1/2: 22 (OP_PUTFH)
[ 9018.997370] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9018.997424] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 2 #1: 22: status 0
[ 9018.997452] nfsv4 compound op #2/2: 20 (OP_OPEN_CONFIRM)
[ 9018.997479] NFSD: nfsd4_open_confirm on file lockme.file
[ 9018.997507] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9018.997554] NFSD: nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op: seqid=1 stateid = (4d238df3/00015581/0001274a/00000000)
[ 9018.997601] NFSD: find_stateid flags 0x6
[ 9018.997626] renewing client (clientid 4d238df3/0000000a)
[ 9018.997653] NFSD: nfsd4_open_confirm: success, seqid=1 stateid=(4d238df3/00015581/0001274a/00000001)
[ 9018.997700] NFSD: nfsd4_create_clid_dir for "2a9477472b93e2ed771e3f5269ce84a5"
[ 9018.998498] NFSD: nfsd4_create_clid_dir returns 0
[ 9018.998526] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 2 #2: 20: status 0
[ 9018.998555] nfsv4 compound returned 0
[ 9019.001009] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9019.001034] nfsv4 compound op #1/2: 22 (OP_PUTFH)
[ 9019.001061] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9019.001111] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 2 #1: 22: status 0
[ 9019.001140] nfsv4 compound op #2/2: 12 (OP_LOCK)
[ 9019.001166] NFSD: nfsd4_lock: start=0 length=-1
[ 9019.001192] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9019.001239] NFSD: nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op: seqid=2 stateid = (4d238df3/00015581/0001274a/00000001)
[ 9019.001286] NFSD: find_stateid flags 0x4
[ 9019.001311] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 2 #2: 12: status 10038
[ 9019.001341] nfsv4 compound returned 10038
[ 9019.002179] nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
[ 9019.002205] nfsv4 compound op #1/3: 22 (OP_PUTFH)
[ 9019.002231] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9019.002280] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #1: 22: status 0
[ 9019.002309] nfsv4 compound op #2/3: 4 (OP_CLOSE)
[ 9019.002334] NFSD: nfsd4_close on file lockme.file
[ 9019.002360] NFSD: nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op: seqid=3 stateid = (4d238df3/00015581/0001274a/00000001)
[ 9019.002408] NFSD: find_stateid flags 0x44
[ 9019.002432] renewing client (clientid 4d238df3/0000000a)
[ 9019.002461] NFSD: move_to_close_lru nfs4_stateowner ffff8800c23b06a0
[ 9019.002490] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #2: 4: status 0
[ 9019.002519] nfsv4 compound op #3/3: 9 (OP_GETATTR)
[ 9019.002546] nfsd: fh_verify(20: 81010001 00000001 00367f0c 00000000 cfe46e7a 00000000)
[ 9019.002593] nfsv4 compound op ffff8802264a5078 opcnt 3 #3: 9: status 0
[ 9019.002622] nfsv4 compound returned 0
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:42:45PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:49 -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In testing NFSv4, I found that this lock test script fails with EIO:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > $|=1;
> > use Fcntl qw(:DEFAULT :flock);
> > open(IN, "< locktest.pl") or die "open: $!";
> > print "Locking...\n";
> > flock(IN,LOCK_EX) or die "flock $filename: $!";
> > print "Locked.\n";
> > sleep(4);
> > print "Unlocking...\n";
> > close(IN);
> > exit(0);
> >
> > This just locks itself (assuming it's called locktest.pl). This works
> > fine over NFSv3, but with NFSv4, I'm seeing:
> >
> > flock(3, LOCK_EX) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
> >
> > tcpdump and NFS debugging shows status "10038", which as far as I can
> > tell is "NFS4ERR_OPENMODE".
>
> That is known and expected behaviour. We have to map flock() onto byte
> range locks (i.e. POSIX locks), and since LOCK_EX has to map to a write
> lock in order to give exclusive semantics, the server will not allow it
> when you only have the file open for reading.
So, I tested fcntl(F_SETLKW) with F_RDLCK and F_WRLCK as you describe,
and the semantics do work there as expected, returning EBADF if the
descriptor is open O_RDONLY over NFSv3, NFSv4, and locally.
It seems that with NFSv3, the client does the check only in the fcntl()
F_WRLCK case, and that or the flock() case, passes the lock request the
same way via NLMv4, where the server does not care how the file handle
was opened. With NFSv4, the server is always rejecting write/exclusive
lock requests on file handles opened O_RDONLY.
It's unfortunate that the flock() interface makes no check itself, though
this appears intentional, as it is advisory-only. Meanwhile, we have a
number of user-uploaded applications which rely on the local and NFSv3
flock() behaviour on O_RDONLY descriptors, which means that we can't just
switch to NFSv4 without breaking those applications.
Simon-
#!/usr/bin/perl
$|=1;
use Fcntl;
open(IN, "+< locktestfcntl.pl") or die "open: $!";
print "Locking...\n";
$x = pack('ssllllllll',F_WRLCK,SEEK_SET,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0);
fcntl(IN,F_SETLKW,$x) or die "fcntl: $!";
print "Locked.\n";
sleep(4);
print "Unlocking...\n";
close(IN);
exit(0);
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:49 -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In testing NFSv4, I found that this lock test script fails with EIO:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> $|=1;
> use Fcntl qw(:DEFAULT :flock);
> open(IN, "< locktest.pl") or die "open: $!";
> print "Locking...\n";
> flock(IN,LOCK_EX) or die "flock $filename: $!";
> print "Locked.\n";
> sleep(4);
> print "Unlocking...\n";
> close(IN);
> exit(0);
>
> This just locks itself (assuming it's called locktest.pl). This works
> fine over NFSv3, but with NFSv4, I'm seeing:
>
> flock(3, LOCK_EX) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
>
> tcpdump and NFS debugging shows status "10038", which as far as I can
> tell is "NFS4ERR_OPENMODE".
That is known and expected behaviour. We have to map flock() onto byte
range locks (i.e. POSIX locks), and since LOCK_EX has to map to a write
lock in order to give exclusive semantics, the server will not allow it
when you only have the file open for reading.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
[email protected]
http://www.netapp.com