2014-07-03 19:16:00

by Jeff Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: add a nfserrno mapping for -E2BIG to nfserr_fbig

I saw this pop up with some pynfs testing:

[ 123.609992] nfsd: non-standard errno: -7

...and -7 is -E2BIG. I think what happened is that XFS returned -E2BIG
due to some xattr operations with the ACL10 pynfs TEST (I guess it has
limited xattr size?).

Add a better mapping for that error since it's possible that we'll need
it. How about we convert it to NFSERR_FBIG? As Bruce points out, they
both have "BIG" in the name so it must be good.

Also, turn the printk in this function into a WARN() so that we can get
a bit more information about situations that don't have proper mappings.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
index eff49552cdc8..b19c7e8bf64c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
@@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ nfserrno (int errno)
{ nfserr_noent, -ENOENT },
{ nfserr_io, -EIO },
{ nfserr_nxio, -ENXIO },
+ { nfserr_fbig, -E2BIG },
{ nfserr_acces, -EACCES },
{ nfserr_exist, -EEXIST },
{ nfserr_xdev, -EXDEV },
@@ -751,7 +752,7 @@ nfserrno (int errno)
if (nfs_errtbl[i].syserr == errno)
return nfs_errtbl[i].nfserr;
}
- printk (KERN_INFO "nfsd: non-standard errno: %d\n", errno);
+ WARN(1, "nfsd: non-standard errno: %d\n", errno);
return nfserr_io;
}

--
1.9.3



2014-07-07 18:38:35

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: add a nfserrno mapping for -E2BIG to nfserr_fbig

Thanks, applied.--b.

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:15:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I saw this pop up with some pynfs testing:
>
> [ 123.609992] nfsd: non-standard errno: -7
>
> ...and -7 is -E2BIG. I think what happened is that XFS returned -E2BIG
> due to some xattr operations with the ACL10 pynfs TEST (I guess it has
> limited xattr size?).
>
> Add a better mapping for that error since it's possible that we'll need
> it. How about we convert it to NFSERR_FBIG? As Bruce points out, they
> both have "BIG" in the name so it must be good.
>
> Also, turn the printk in this function into a WARN() so that we can get
> a bit more information about situations that don't have proper mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> index eff49552cdc8..b19c7e8bf64c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ nfserrno (int errno)
> { nfserr_noent, -ENOENT },
> { nfserr_io, -EIO },
> { nfserr_nxio, -ENXIO },
> + { nfserr_fbig, -E2BIG },
> { nfserr_acces, -EACCES },
> { nfserr_exist, -EEXIST },
> { nfserr_xdev, -EXDEV },
> @@ -751,7 +752,7 @@ nfserrno (int errno)
> if (nfs_errtbl[i].syserr == errno)
> return nfs_errtbl[i].nfserr;
> }
> - printk (KERN_INFO "nfsd: non-standard errno: %d\n", errno);
> + WARN(1, "nfsd: non-standard errno: %d\n", errno);
> return nfserr_io;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>