2015-08-05 02:29:59

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Remove redundant checks in pnfs_layoutgets_blocked()

If there are no valid layout segments, then we should already have
checked in pnfs_update_layout() whether or not this is the first
layoutget.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 70bf706b1090..aa95544123c5 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -829,12 +829,10 @@ pnfs_layout_returning(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
/* lget is set to 1 if called from inside send_layoutget call chain */
static bool
pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
- struct pnfs_layout_range *range, int lget)
+ struct pnfs_layout_range *range)
{
return lo->plh_block_lgets ||
test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags) ||
- (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
- (atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) > lget)) ||
pnfs_layout_returning(lo, range);
}

@@ -847,7 +845,7 @@ pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,

dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
spin_lock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, range, 1)) {
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, range)) {
status = -EAGAIN;
} else if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(open_state)) {
status = -EBADF;
@@ -1547,7 +1545,7 @@ lookup_again:
goto out_put_layout_hdr;
}

- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &arg, 0))
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &arg))
goto out_unlock;
atomic_inc(&lo->plh_outstanding);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
@@ -1624,7 +1622,7 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
goto out_forget_reply;
}

- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &lgp->args.range, 1)) {
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &lgp->args.range)) {
dprintk("%s forget reply due to state\n", __func__);
goto out_forget_reply;
}
--
2.4.3



2015-08-05 02:30:00

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Fix serialisation of layout return and layoutget

We should always test for outstanding layout returns, whether or not
pnfs_should_retry_layoutget() is true.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index aa95544123c5..5280def00bc4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1436,6 +1436,8 @@ static int pnfs_layoutget_retry_bit_wait(struct wait_bit_key *key)

static bool pnfs_prepare_to_retry_layoutget(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
{
+ if (!pnfs_should_retry_layoutget(lo))
+ return false;
/*
* send layoutcommit as it can hold up layoutreturn due to lseg
* reference
@@ -1531,8 +1533,7 @@ lookup_again:
* Because we free lsegs before sending LAYOUTRETURN, we need to wait
* for LAYOUTRETURN even if first is true.
*/
- if (!lseg && pnfs_should_retry_layoutget(lo) &&
- test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags)) {
+ if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags)) {
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
dprintk("%s wait for layoutreturn\n", __func__);
if (pnfs_prepare_to_retry_layoutget(lo)) {
--
2.4.3


2015-08-05 02:30:02

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Remove redundant lo->plh_block_lgets in layoutreturn

The NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN bit already suffices to ensure that layoutget
is blocked.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 9147dcaeb546..0c6aa13525e4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
if (test_and_set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags))
return false;
lo->plh_return_iomode = 0;
- lo->plh_block_lgets++;
pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
clear_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_BEFORE_CLOSE, &lo->plh_flags);
return true;
@@ -954,7 +953,6 @@ pnfs_send_layoutreturn(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, nfs4_stateid stateid,
if (unlikely(lrp == NULL)) {
status = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
- lo->plh_block_lgets--;
pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_waitbit(lo);
rpc_wake_up(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
--
2.4.3


2015-08-05 02:30:01

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Don't prevent layoutgets when doing return-on-close

If there is an outstanding return-on-close, then we just want new
layoutget requests to wait rather than fail.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 5280def00bc4..9147dcaeb546 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1105,7 +1105,9 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino)
}
if (!found)
goto out_noroc;
- lo->plh_block_lgets++;
+ if (test_and_set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags))
+ goto out_noroc;
+ lo->plh_return_iomode = IOMODE_ANY;
pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo); /* matched in pnfs_roc_release */
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
@@ -1133,7 +1135,7 @@ void pnfs_roc_release(struct inode *ino)

spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
lo = NFS_I(ino)->layout;
- lo->plh_block_lgets--;
+ pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_waitbit(lo);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->plh_refcount)) {
pnfs_detach_layout_hdr(lo);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
--
2.4.3


2015-08-05 02:30:04

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Remove redundant check in pnfs_layoutgets_blocked()

layoutget now should already be serialised w.r.t. layout returns

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 26 +++++---------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 0c6aa13525e4..b6540cc41f7c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -816,23 +816,12 @@ pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
return !pnfs_seqid_is_newer(seqid, lo->plh_barrier);
}

-static bool
-pnfs_layout_returning(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
- struct pnfs_layout_range *range)
-{
- return test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags) &&
- (lo->plh_return_iomode == IOMODE_ANY ||
- lo->plh_return_iomode == range->iomode);
-}
-
/* lget is set to 1 if called from inside send_layoutget call chain */
static bool
-pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
- struct pnfs_layout_range *range)
+pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(const struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
{
return lo->plh_block_lgets ||
- test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags) ||
- pnfs_layout_returning(lo, range);
+ test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags);
}

int
@@ -844,7 +833,7 @@ pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,

dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
spin_lock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, range)) {
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo)) {
status = -EAGAIN;
} else if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(open_state)) {
status = -EBADF;
@@ -1546,7 +1535,7 @@ lookup_again:
goto out_put_layout_hdr;
}

- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &arg))
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo))
goto out_unlock;
atomic_inc(&lo->plh_outstanding);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
@@ -1618,12 +1607,7 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
lseg->pls_range = res->range;

spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
- if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags)) {
- dprintk("%s forget reply due to recall\n", __func__);
- goto out_forget_reply;
- }
-
- if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo, &lgp->args.range)) {
+ if (pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo)) {
dprintk("%s forget reply due to state\n", __func__);
goto out_forget_reply;
}
--
2.4.3


2015-08-05 02:30:04

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Remove redundant wakeup in pnfs_send_layoutreturn()

pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_waitbit() should already be calling
rpc_wake_up(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq) for us.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index b6540cc41f7c..9ca637821bb6 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -943,7 +943,6 @@ pnfs_send_layoutreturn(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, nfs4_stateid stateid,
status = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_waitbit(lo);
- rpc_wake_up(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
goto out;
--
2.4.3


2015-08-17 14:42:57

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Don't prevent layoutgets when doing return-on-close

This break the block layout client badly. With this patch applied
it silently hangs in xfstests generic/001. I'll see if I can
get more details out of my test setup.

2015-08-18 11:33:19

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NFSv4.1/pnfs: Don't prevent layoutgets when doing return-on-close

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:42:56AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This break the block layout client badly. With this patch applied
> it silently hangs in xfstests generic/001. I'll see if I can
> get more details out of my test setup.

Seems like it's waiting either forever or frequently in this
callchain:

[<ffffffff81d30f24>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x34/0x80
[<ffffffff81d30ee8>] __rpc_wait_for_completion_task+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffff8138a7cc>] nfs4_do_close+0x1dc/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8139a429>] __nfs4_close+0xd9/0x180
[<ffffffff8139a503>] nfs4_close_sync+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff81380035>] nfs4_close_context+0x25/0x30
[<ffffffff81363a43>] __put_nfs_open_context+0xc3/0x110
[<ffffffff8136588c>] nfs_release+0x9c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81362581>] nfs_file_release+0x41/0x60
[<ffffffff811dca02>] __fput+0xa2/0x1e0
[<ffffffff811dcb79>] ____fput+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff810e52b6>] task_work_run+0x96/0xb0
[<ffffffff810c89dc>] do_exit+0x2cc/0xa10
[<ffffffff810c91f7>] do_group_exit+0x47/0xc0
[<ffffffff810c9282>] SyS_exit_group+0x12/0x20
[<ffffffff81d80eae>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Trond, does this pass xfstests generic/001 fine with whatever Server
you're testing against?