2020-01-06 18:43:05

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] Fix error reporting for NFS writes

In cases where we have transient errors, such as ENOSPC, it is important
to ensure that errors are reported on all writes that may be affected.

The problem we have is that not all errors are guaranteed to be reported
at write time. Some are reported only when we call fsync(). In
particular, this can be a problem for stable NFS writes. Since most
filesystems protect the write to the page cache with the inode lock,
but do not protect the subsequent call to generic_write_sync(), this
means that if we have parallel writes to the same file, we can end up
assigning the error to the wrong stable write call. If the application
expects to be able to fix the transient errors, it may end up replaying
the wrong write. One area where we have seen this happen is in flexfiles
writes, where the server is capable of freeing up space on the DS in
case of ENOSPC.

The other area where we have seen a similar problem is when we have
unstable writes, and the client sends a backgrounded commit in order
to free up memory. If there are outstanding writes while the commit
gets a transient error and bumps the write verifier, then we want to
ensure that those writes get the approprite write verifier depending
on whether they were affected by the fsync() or not. Right now,
because the NFSv3 verifier is set in the XDR encoder well after the
write is done, there is fairly large window for a race with a
background commit.

This patch series deals with both issues by adding per-file-descriptor
locking that ensures that writes, fsync error handling, and write verifier
updates are appropriately serialised.

Trond Myklebust (9):
nfsd: Allow nfsd_vfs_write() to take the nfsd_file as an argument
nfsd: Fix stable writes
nfsd: Update the boot verifier on stable writes too.
nfsd: Pass the nfsd_file as arguments to nfsd4_clone_file_range()
nfsd: Ensure exclusion between CLONE and WRITE errors
sunrpc: Fix potential leaks in sunrpc_cache_unhash()
sunrpc: clean up cache entry add/remove from hashtable
nfsd: Ensure sampling of the commit verifier is atomic with the commit
nfsd: Ensure sampling of the write verifier is atomic with the write

fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 1 +
fs/nfsd/filecache.h | 1 +
fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c | 5 +--
fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c | 16 +++------
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++----
fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 2 +-
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
fs/nfsd/vfs.h | 16 +++++----
fs/nfsd/xdr3.h | 2 ++
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 48 ++++++++++++++-------------
10 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

--
2.24.1


2020-01-22 15:28:16

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Fix error reporting for NFS writes

By the way, anyone know how to handle quoted-printable patches?

For some reason, git-am seems to deal with them, but git-apply doesn't.
So it's fine until there's some minor conflict.

--b.

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 01:40:28PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> In cases where we have transient errors, such as ENOSPC, it is important
> to ensure that errors are reported on all writes that may be affected.
>
> The problem we have is that not all errors are guaranteed to be reported
> at write time. Some are reported only when we call fsync(). In
> particular, this can be a problem for stable NFS writes. Since most
> filesystems protect the write to the page cache with the inode lock,
> but do not protect the subsequent call to generic_write_sync(), this
> means that if we have parallel writes to the same file, we can end up
> assigning the error to the wrong stable write call. If the application
> expects to be able to fix the transient errors, it may end up replaying
> the wrong write. One area where we have seen this happen is in flexfiles
> writes, where the server is capable of freeing up space on the DS in
> case of ENOSPC.
>
> The other area where we have seen a similar problem is when we have
> unstable writes, and the client sends a backgrounded commit in order
> to free up memory. If there are outstanding writes while the commit
> gets a transient error and bumps the write verifier, then we want to
> ensure that those writes get the approprite write verifier depending
> on whether they were affected by the fsync() or not. Right now,
> because the NFSv3 verifier is set in the XDR encoder well after the
> write is done, there is fairly large window for a race with a
> background commit.
>
> This patch series deals with both issues by adding per-file-descriptor
> locking that ensures that writes, fsync error handling, and write verifier
> updates are appropriately serialised.
>
> Trond Myklebust (9):
> nfsd: Allow nfsd_vfs_write() to take the nfsd_file as an argument
> nfsd: Fix stable writes
> nfsd: Update the boot verifier on stable writes too.
> nfsd: Pass the nfsd_file as arguments to nfsd4_clone_file_range()
> nfsd: Ensure exclusion between CLONE and WRITE errors
> sunrpc: Fix potential leaks in sunrpc_cache_unhash()
> sunrpc: clean up cache entry add/remove from hashtable
> nfsd: Ensure sampling of the commit verifier is atomic with the commit
> nfsd: Ensure sampling of the write verifier is atomic with the write
>
> fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/filecache.h | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c | 5 +--
> fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c | 16 +++------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++----
> fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> fs/nfsd/vfs.h | 16 +++++----
> fs/nfsd/xdr3.h | 2 ++
> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 48 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 10 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.24.1

2020-01-22 17:04:31

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Fix error reporting for NFS writes

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:27:51AM -0500, bfields wrote:
> By the way, anyone know how to handle quoted-printable patches?
>
> For some reason, git-am seems to deal with them, but git-apply doesn't.
> So it's fine until there's some minor conflict.

(Ended up running them through "tcucodec quote -d". Maybe there's some
more obvious solution.)

--b.