2008-12-17 18:59:10

by Tom Tucker

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 09:27 -0600, Tom Tucker wrote:
>>> + if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags))
>>> + kernel_sock_shutdown(svsk->sk_sock, SHUT_RDWR);
>> How is this different than what happens as an artifact of sock_release?
>
> The point is that it is independent of whether or not something is
> holding a reference to the svc_sock.

Thanks, makes sense.

>