The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
was introduced by f9bb94c4.
Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index db52546..8605d38 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ static inline void nfsd4_increment_op_stats(u32 opnum)
typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
void *);
enum nfsd4_op_flags {
- ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
- ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
- ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
+ ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 1, /* No current filehandle required */
+ ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 2, /* ops processed on absent fs */
+ ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 3, /* ops reqired first in compound */
};
struct nfsd4_operation {
--
1.7.4.1
BTW, any particular reason you sent this to Chuck and not Bruce <[email protected]>
who's the nfs server maintainer?
On 2011-02-17 04:02, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
>
> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
>
> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index db52546..8605d38 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ static inline void nfsd4_increment_op_stats(u32 opnum)
> typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
> void *);
> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
> - ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> + ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 1, /* No current filehandle required */
> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 2, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 3, /* ops reqired first in compound */
Right, just 1 << {0,1,2} would make more sense :)
Benny
> };
>
> struct nfsd4_operation {
Benny Halevy $B<LF;(B:
> BTW, any particular reason you sent this to Chuck and not Bruce <[email protected]>
> who's the nfs server maintainer?
Sorry for my mistake.
>
> On 2011-02-17 04:02, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
>> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
>>
>> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
>> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
>>
>> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
>> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>> index db52546..8605d38 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ static inline void nfsd4_increment_op_stats(u32 opnum)
>> typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
>> void *);
>> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
>> - ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
>> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
>> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
>> + ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 1, /* No current filehandle required */
>> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 2, /* ops processed on absent fs */
>> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 3, /* ops reqired first in compound */
>
> Right, just 1 << {0,1,2} would make more sense :)
Thanks for your advice.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:09:54AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>
>
> Benny Halevy 写道:
> > BTW, any particular reason you sent this to Chuck and not Bruce <[email protected]>
> > who's the nfs server maintainer?
>
> Sorry for my mistake.
>
> >
> > On 2011-02-17 04:02, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> >> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
> >> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
> >>
> >> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
> >> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
> >>
> >> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
> >> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++---
> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> index db52546..8605d38 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> >> @@ -983,9 +983,9 @@ static inline void nfsd4_increment_op_stats(u32 opnum)
> >> typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
> >> void *);
> >> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
> >> - ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
> >> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> >> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> >> + ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 1, /* No current filehandle required */
> >> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 2, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> >> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 3, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> >
> > Right, just 1 << {0,1,2} would make more sense :)
>
> Thanks for your advice.
Thanks for catching this, and apologies for the delay; queueing up for
2.6.39.
--b.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> >From b01bae649293d160af07dde30fde6aa3ac7f8759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:08:31 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] nfsd41: modify the members value of nfsd4_op_flags
>
> The members of nfsd4_op_flags, (ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS)
> equals to ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP, maybe that's not what we want.
>
> OP_PUTROOTFH with op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS,
> can't appears as the first operation with out SEQUENCE ops.
>
> This patch modify the wrong value of ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH etc which
> was introduced by f9bb94c4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index db52546..5fcb139 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -984,8 +984,8 @@ typedef __be32(*nfsd4op_func)(struct svc_rqst *, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
> void *);
> enum nfsd4_op_flags {
> ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH = 1 << 0, /* No current filehandle required */
> - ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 2 << 0, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> - ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 3 << 0, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> + ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS = 1 << 1, /* ops processed on absent fs */
> + ALLOWED_AS_FIRST_OP = 1 << 2, /* ops reqired first in compound */
> };
>
> struct nfsd4_operation {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html