Hi Boaz,
Does the following patch makes sense in the new v3.1 ORE world?
Can you please help test it?
If it looks ok to you I'll just go ahead and release the rebased tree
to linux-nfs.org and you can pull it from there.
Thanks,
Benny
>From d89d93c733c8bc2984f1a918e522494558306f1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:33:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
---
fs/exofs/export.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exofs/export.c b/fs/exofs/export.c
index 8281c85..07bc5e2 100644
--- a/fs/exofs/export.c
+++ b/fs/exofs/export.c
@@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ err:
return status;
}
+static unsigned exofs_layout_od_id(struct ore_layout *layout,
+ struct ore_components *comps,
+ osd_id obj_no, unsigned layout_index)
+{
+ return (layout_index + obj_no * layout->mirrors_p1) % comps->numdevs;
+}
+
static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
struct inode *inode,
struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
@@ -81,7 +88,8 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
{
struct exofs_i_info *oi = exofs_i(inode);
struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
- struct exofs_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
+ struct ore_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
+ struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
struct pnfs_osd_object_cred *creds = NULL;
struct pnfs_osd_layout layout;
__be32 *start;
@@ -104,7 +112,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
/* Fill in a pnfs_osd_layout struct */
layout.olo_map = sbi->data_map;
layout.olo_comps_index = 0;
- layout.olo_num_comps = el->s_numdevs;
+ layout.olo_num_comps = ec->numdevs;
layout.olo_comps = creds;
nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_hdr(xdr, &layout);
@@ -112,16 +120,19 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
goto out;
/* Encode layout components */
- for (i = 0; i < el->s_numdevs; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ec->numdevs; i++) {
struct pnfs_osd_object_cred cred;
- osd_id id = exofs_oi_objno(oi);
- unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, id, i);
+ struct osd_obj_id oid = {
+ .partition = sbi->one_comp.obj.partition,
+ .id = exofs_oi_objno(oi)
+ };
+ unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, ec, oid.id, i);
set_dev_id(&cred.oc_object_id.oid_device_id, args->lg_sbid,
dev);
- cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = el->s_pid;
- cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = id;
- cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(el->s_ods[dev]) ?
+ cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = oid.partition;
+ cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = oid.id;
+ cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(ec->ods[dev]) ?
PNFS_OSD_VERSION_1 :
PNFS_OSD_VERSION_2;
cred.oc_cap_key_sec = PNFS_OSD_CAP_KEY_SEC_NONE;
@@ -130,7 +141,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
cred.oc_cap_key.cred = NULL;
cred.oc_cap.cred_len = OSD_CAP_LEN;
- cred.oc_cap.cred = oi->i_cred;
+ exofs_make_credential(cred.oc_cap.cred, &oid);
nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_cred(xdr, &cred);
if (unlikely(nfserr))
goto out;
@@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
const struct nfsd4_pnfs_deviceid *devid)
{
struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
+ struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
struct pnfs_osd_deviceaddr devaddr;
const struct osd_dev_info *odi;
u64 devno = devid->devid;
@@ -285,13 +297,13 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
memset(&devaddr, 0, sizeof(devaddr));
- if (unlikely(devno >= sbi->layout.s_numdevs)) {
+ if (unlikely(devno >= ec->numdevs)) {
EXOFS_DBGMSG("Error: Device((%llx,%llx) does not exist\n",
devid->sbid, devno);
return -ENODEV;
}
- odi = osduld_device_info(sbi->layout.s_ods[devno]);
+ odi = osduld_device_info(ec->ods[devno]);
devaddr.oda_systemid.len = odi->systemid_len;
devaddr.oda_systemid.data = (void *)odi->systemid; /* !const cast */
--
1.7.6
On 2011-08-09 22:18, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Benny hi
>
> Please push your new tree with below patch and I will
> send you SQUASHMES ontop of your tree. This is because
> I'm having problems making a coherent tree, because
> current pnfs/pnfsd-exofs branch has conflicts when
> merging with 3.1-rc1. So your rebase should save me the
> resolving work.
Done. Thanks!
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
>
> On 08/09/2011 10:30 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>
>> Sorry Benny about the merge conflicts I caused you
>> with the rushed push to Linus.
>>
>> I'll send you soon the proper fix, actually the
>> change needs to be deeper and the resulting code
>> is more simple.
>>
>> There are also a couple of more patches to export.c
>> that need to be added as well.
>>
>> I'll send it all today, I hope it's soon enough.
>> If not then below makes it compile I can prepare
>> the SQUASHMEs ontop of your tree.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Boaz
>>
>> On 08/09/2011 07:09 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> forwarding to osd-dev list...
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [PATCH RFC] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
>>> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:25:32 -0400
>>> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>>> To: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
>>> CC: NFS list <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hi Boaz,
>>>
>>> Does the following patch makes sense in the new v3.1 ORE world?
>>> Can you please help test it?
>>> If it looks ok to you I'll just go ahead and release the rebased tree
>>> to linux-nfs.org and you can pull it from there.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Benny
>>>
>>> >From d89d93c733c8bc2984f1a918e522494558306f1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:33:11 -0400
>>> Subject: [PATCH] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/exofs/export.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/exofs/export.c b/fs/exofs/export.c
>>> index 8281c85..07bc5e2 100644
>>> --- a/fs/exofs/export.c
>>> +++ b/fs/exofs/export.c
>>> @@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ err:
>>> return status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static unsigned exofs_layout_od_id(struct ore_layout *layout,
>>> + struct ore_components *comps,
>>> + osd_id obj_no, unsigned layout_index)
>>> +{
>>> + return (layout_index + obj_no * layout->mirrors_p1) % comps->numdevs;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>>> struct inode *inode,
>>> struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>>> @@ -81,7 +88,8 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>>> {
>>> struct exofs_i_info *oi = exofs_i(inode);
>>> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>>> - struct exofs_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
>>> + struct ore_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
>>> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
>>> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred *creds = NULL;
>>> struct pnfs_osd_layout layout;
>>> __be32 *start;
>>> @@ -104,7 +112,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>>> /* Fill in a pnfs_osd_layout struct */
>>> layout.olo_map = sbi->data_map;
>>> layout.olo_comps_index = 0;
>>> - layout.olo_num_comps = el->s_numdevs;
>>> + layout.olo_num_comps = ec->numdevs;
>>> layout.olo_comps = creds;
>>>
>>> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_hdr(xdr, &layout);
>>> @@ -112,16 +120,19 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> /* Encode layout components */
>>> - for (i = 0; i < el->s_numdevs; i++) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ec->numdevs; i++) {
>>> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred cred;
>>> - osd_id id = exofs_oi_objno(oi);
>>> - unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, id, i);
>>> + struct osd_obj_id oid = {
>>> + .partition = sbi->one_comp.obj.partition,
>>> + .id = exofs_oi_objno(oi)
>>> + };
>>> + unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, ec, oid.id, i);
>>>
>>> set_dev_id(&cred.oc_object_id.oid_device_id, args->lg_sbid,
>>> dev);
>>> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = el->s_pid;
>>> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = id;
>>> - cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(el->s_ods[dev]) ?
>>> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = oid.partition;
>>> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = oid.id;
>>> + cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(ec->ods[dev]) ?
>>> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_1 :
>>> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_2;
>>> cred.oc_cap_key_sec = PNFS_OSD_CAP_KEY_SEC_NONE;
>>> @@ -130,7 +141,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>>> cred.oc_cap_key.cred = NULL;
>>>
>>> cred.oc_cap.cred_len = OSD_CAP_LEN;
>>> - cred.oc_cap.cred = oi->i_cred;
>>> + exofs_make_credential(cred.oc_cap.cred, &oid);
>>> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_cred(xdr, &cred);
>>> if (unlikely(nfserr))
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>>> const struct nfsd4_pnfs_deviceid *devid)
>>> {
>>> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
>>> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
>>> struct pnfs_osd_deviceaddr devaddr;
>>> const struct osd_dev_info *odi;
>>> u64 devno = devid->devid;
>>> @@ -285,13 +297,13 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>>>
>>> memset(&devaddr, 0, sizeof(devaddr));
>>>
>>> - if (unlikely(devno >= sbi->layout.s_numdevs)) {
>>> + if (unlikely(devno >= ec->numdevs)) {
>>> EXOFS_DBGMSG("Error: Device((%llx,%llx) does not exist\n",
>>> devid->sbid, devno);
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - odi = osduld_device_info(sbi->layout.s_ods[devno]);
>>> + odi = osduld_device_info(ec->ods[devno]);
>>>
>>> devaddr.oda_systemid.len = odi->systemid_len;
>>> devaddr.oda_systemid.data = (void *)odi->systemid; /* !const cast */
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osd-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.open-osd.org/mailman/listinfo/osd-dev
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Benny hi
Please push your new tree with below patch and I will
send you SQUASHMES ontop of your tree. This is because
I'm having problems making a coherent tree, because
current pnfs/pnfsd-exofs branch has conflicts when
merging with 3.1-rc1. So your rebase should save me the
resolving work.
Thanks
Boaz
On 08/09/2011 10:30 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> Sorry Benny about the merge conflicts I caused you
> with the rushed push to Linus.
>
> I'll send you soon the proper fix, actually the
> change needs to be deeper and the resulting code
> is more simple.
>
> There are also a couple of more patches to export.c
> that need to be added as well.
>
> I'll send it all today, I hope it's soon enough.
> If not then below makes it compile I can prepare
> the SQUASHMEs ontop of your tree.
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
>
> On 08/09/2011 07:09 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> forwarding to osd-dev list...
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [PATCH RFC] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
>> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:25:32 -0400
>> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>> To: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
>> CC: NFS list <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi Boaz,
>>
>> Does the following patch makes sense in the new v3.1 ORE world?
>> Can you please help test it?
>> If it looks ok to you I'll just go ahead and release the rebased tree
>> to linux-nfs.org and you can pull it from there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Benny
>>
>> >From d89d93c733c8bc2984f1a918e522494558306f1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:33:11 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/exofs/export.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exofs/export.c b/fs/exofs/export.c
>> index 8281c85..07bc5e2 100644
>> --- a/fs/exofs/export.c
>> +++ b/fs/exofs/export.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ err:
>> return status;
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned exofs_layout_od_id(struct ore_layout *layout,
>> + struct ore_components *comps,
>> + osd_id obj_no, unsigned layout_index)
>> +{
>> + return (layout_index + obj_no * layout->mirrors_p1) % comps->numdevs;
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>> struct inode *inode,
>> struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>> @@ -81,7 +88,8 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>> {
>> struct exofs_i_info *oi = exofs_i(inode);
>> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>> - struct exofs_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
>> + struct ore_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
>> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
>> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred *creds = NULL;
>> struct pnfs_osd_layout layout;
>> __be32 *start;
>> @@ -104,7 +112,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>> /* Fill in a pnfs_osd_layout struct */
>> layout.olo_map = sbi->data_map;
>> layout.olo_comps_index = 0;
>> - layout.olo_num_comps = el->s_numdevs;
>> + layout.olo_num_comps = ec->numdevs;
>> layout.olo_comps = creds;
>>
>> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_hdr(xdr, &layout);
>> @@ -112,16 +120,19 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>> goto out;
>>
>> /* Encode layout components */
>> - for (i = 0; i < el->s_numdevs; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < ec->numdevs; i++) {
>> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred cred;
>> - osd_id id = exofs_oi_objno(oi);
>> - unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, id, i);
>> + struct osd_obj_id oid = {
>> + .partition = sbi->one_comp.obj.partition,
>> + .id = exofs_oi_objno(oi)
>> + };
>> + unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, ec, oid.id, i);
>>
>> set_dev_id(&cred.oc_object_id.oid_device_id, args->lg_sbid,
>> dev);
>> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = el->s_pid;
>> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = id;
>> - cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(el->s_ods[dev]) ?
>> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = oid.partition;
>> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = oid.id;
>> + cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(ec->ods[dev]) ?
>> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_1 :
>> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_2;
>> cred.oc_cap_key_sec = PNFS_OSD_CAP_KEY_SEC_NONE;
>> @@ -130,7 +141,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
>> cred.oc_cap_key.cred = NULL;
>>
>> cred.oc_cap.cred_len = OSD_CAP_LEN;
>> - cred.oc_cap.cred = oi->i_cred;
>> + exofs_make_credential(cred.oc_cap.cred, &oid);
>> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_cred(xdr, &cred);
>> if (unlikely(nfserr))
>> goto out;
>> @@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>> const struct nfsd4_pnfs_deviceid *devid)
>> {
>> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
>> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
>> struct pnfs_osd_deviceaddr devaddr;
>> const struct osd_dev_info *odi;
>> u64 devno = devid->devid;
>> @@ -285,13 +297,13 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>>
>> memset(&devaddr, 0, sizeof(devaddr));
>>
>> - if (unlikely(devno >= sbi->layout.s_numdevs)) {
>> + if (unlikely(devno >= ec->numdevs)) {
>> EXOFS_DBGMSG("Error: Device((%llx,%llx) does not exist\n",
>> devid->sbid, devno);
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> - odi = osduld_device_info(sbi->layout.s_ods[devno]);
>> + odi = osduld_device_info(ec->ods[devno]);
>>
>> devaddr.oda_systemid.len = odi->systemid_len;
>> devaddr.oda_systemid.data = (void *)odi->systemid; /* !const cast */
>
> _______________________________________________
> osd-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.open-osd.org/mailman/listinfo/osd-dev
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sorry Benny about the merge conflicts I caused you
with the rushed push to Linus.
I'll send you soon the proper fix, actually the
change needs to be deeper and the resulting code
is more simple.
There are also a couple of more patches to export.c
that need to be added as well.
I'll send it all today, I hope it's soon enough.
If not then below makes it compile I can prepare
the SQUASHMEs ontop of your tree.
Thanks
Boaz
On 08/09/2011 07:09 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> forwarding to osd-dev list...
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [PATCH RFC] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:25:32 -0400
> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
> To: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
> CC: NFS list <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Boaz,
>
> Does the following patch makes sense in the new v3.1 ORE world?
> Can you please help test it?
> If it looks ok to you I'll just go ahead and release the rebased tree
> to linux-nfs.org and you can pull it from there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Benny
>
>>From d89d93c733c8bc2984f1a918e522494558306f1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:33:11 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] pnfsd-exofs: convert to v3.1 ORE
>
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/exofs/export.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/export.c b/fs/exofs/export.c
> index 8281c85..07bc5e2 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/export.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/export.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,13 @@ err:
> return status;
> }
>
> +static unsigned exofs_layout_od_id(struct ore_layout *layout,
> + struct ore_components *comps,
> + osd_id obj_no, unsigned layout_index)
> +{
> + return (layout_index + obj_no * layout->mirrors_p1) % comps->numdevs;
> +}
> +
> static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
> struct inode *inode,
> struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
> @@ -81,7 +88,8 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
> {
> struct exofs_i_info *oi = exofs_i(inode);
> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
> - struct exofs_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
> + struct ore_layout *el = &sbi->layout;
> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred *creds = NULL;
> struct pnfs_osd_layout layout;
> __be32 *start;
> @@ -104,7 +112,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
> /* Fill in a pnfs_osd_layout struct */
> layout.olo_map = sbi->data_map;
> layout.olo_comps_index = 0;
> - layout.olo_num_comps = el->s_numdevs;
> + layout.olo_num_comps = ec->numdevs;
> layout.olo_comps = creds;
>
> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_hdr(xdr, &layout);
> @@ -112,16 +120,19 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
> goto out;
>
> /* Encode layout components */
> - for (i = 0; i < el->s_numdevs; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ec->numdevs; i++) {
> struct pnfs_osd_object_cred cred;
> - osd_id id = exofs_oi_objno(oi);
> - unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, id, i);
> + struct osd_obj_id oid = {
> + .partition = sbi->one_comp.obj.partition,
> + .id = exofs_oi_objno(oi)
> + };
> + unsigned dev = exofs_layout_od_id(el, ec, oid.id, i);
>
> set_dev_id(&cred.oc_object_id.oid_device_id, args->lg_sbid,
> dev);
> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = el->s_pid;
> - cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = id;
> - cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(el->s_ods[dev]) ?
> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_partition_id = oid.partition;
> + cred.oc_object_id.oid_object_id = oid.id;
> + cred.oc_osd_version = osd_dev_is_ver1(ec->ods[dev]) ?
> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_1 :
> PNFS_OSD_VERSION_2;
> cred.oc_cap_key_sec = PNFS_OSD_CAP_KEY_SEC_NONE;
> @@ -130,7 +141,7 @@ static enum nfsstat4 exofs_layout_get(
> cred.oc_cap_key.cred = NULL;
>
> cred.oc_cap.cred_len = OSD_CAP_LEN;
> - cred.oc_cap.cred = oi->i_cred;
> + exofs_make_credential(cred.oc_cap.cred, &oid);
> nfserr = pnfs_osd_xdr_encode_layout_cred(xdr, &cred);
> if (unlikely(nfserr))
> goto out;
> @@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
> const struct nfsd4_pnfs_deviceid *devid)
> {
> struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
> + struct ore_components *ec = &sbi->comps;
> struct pnfs_osd_deviceaddr devaddr;
> const struct osd_dev_info *odi;
> u64 devno = devid->devid;
> @@ -285,13 +297,13 @@ int exofs_get_device_info(struct super_block *sb, struct exp_xdr_stream *xdr,
>
> memset(&devaddr, 0, sizeof(devaddr));
>
> - if (unlikely(devno >= sbi->layout.s_numdevs)) {
> + if (unlikely(devno >= ec->numdevs)) {
> EXOFS_DBGMSG("Error: Device((%llx,%llx) does not exist\n",
> devid->sbid, devno);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - odi = osduld_device_info(sbi->layout.s_ods[devno]);
> + odi = osduld_device_info(ec->ods[devno]);
>
> devaddr.oda_systemid.len = odi->systemid_len;
> devaddr.oda_systemid.data = (void *)odi->systemid; /* !const cast */
_______________________________________________
osd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.open-osd.org/mailman/listinfo/osd-dev
On 08/09/2011 01:22 PM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On 2011-08-09 22:18, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Benny hi
>>
>> Please push your new tree with below patch and I will
>> send you SQUASHMES ontop of your tree. This is because
>> I'm having problems making a coherent tree, because
>> current pnfs/pnfsd-exofs branch has conflicts when
>> merging with 3.1-rc1. So your rebase should save me the
>> resolving work.
>
> Done. Thanks!
>
Great! I'll get things going ontop of that
>>
>> Thanks
>> Boaz
>>