Hi Sir Linus
A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
end.
Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
ZERO risk, just change of email.
Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17
3 patches available in the git repository at:
git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5:
Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Boaz Harrosh (3):
MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email
Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address
Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation
Documentation/scsi/osd.txt | 3 +--
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 4 ++--
fs/exofs/Kbuild | 2 +-
fs/exofs/common.h | 2 +-
fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +-
fs/exofs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/namei.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/ore.c | 4 ++--
fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/ore_raid.h | 2 +-
fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/symlink.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/sys.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 2 +-
fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +-
include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h | 2 +-
include/scsi/osd_initiator.h | 2 +-
include/scsi/osd_ore.h | 2 +-
include/scsi/osd_protocol.h | 4 ++--
include/scsi/osd_sec.h | 2 +-
include/scsi/osd_sense.h | 2 +-
include/scsi/osd_types.h | 2 +-
31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Thanks, have a good Kernel Cycle
Boaz
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Hi Sir Linus
>
> A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
> I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
> end.
> Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
> ZERO risk, just change of email.
>
> Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17
>
> 3 patches available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5:
>
> Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Boaz Harrosh (3):
> MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email
> Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address
> Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation
>
> Documentation/scsi/osd.txt | 3 +--
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 4 ++--
> fs/exofs/Kbuild | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/common.h | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/namei.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/ore.c | 4 ++--
> fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/ore_raid.h | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/symlink.c | 2 +-
> fs/exofs/sys.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h | 2 +-
> include/scsi/osd_initiator.h | 2 +-
> include/scsi/osd_ore.h | 2 +-
> include/scsi/osd_protocol.h | 4 ++--
> include/scsi/osd_sec.h | 2 +-
> include/scsi/osd_sense.h | 2 +-
> include/scsi/osd_types.h | 2 +-
> 31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
This is a bit of an unnecessary massive churn. No one expects the
author named in the file to stay up to date, especially because the
@domain.com usually credits the company who paid for the code, so it's
left in as a kind of mark of respect for them. I'm not saying it
applies in your case, just that it creates the common expectation of
in-file authors needing to be traced through the MAINTAINERS file.
Could you not just update the MAINTAINERS file only, like everyone else?
James
On 10/22/2014 12:04 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Hi Sir Linus
>>
>> A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
>> I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
>> end.
>> Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
>> ZERO risk, just change of email.
>>
>> Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17
>>
>> 3 patches available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5:
>>
>> Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Boaz Harrosh (3):
>> MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email
>> Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address
>> Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation
>>
>> Documentation/scsi/osd.txt | 3 +--
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>> drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild | 2 +-
>> drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 4 ++--
>> fs/exofs/Kbuild | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/common.h | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/file.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/namei.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/ore.c | 4 ++--
>> fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/ore_raid.h | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/symlink.c | 2 +-
>> fs/exofs/sys.c | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 2 +-
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h | 2 +-
>> include/scsi/osd_initiator.h | 2 +-
>> include/scsi/osd_ore.h | 2 +-
>> include/scsi/osd_protocol.h | 4 ++--
>> include/scsi/osd_sec.h | 2 +-
>> include/scsi/osd_sense.h | 2 +-
>> include/scsi/osd_types.h | 2 +-
>> 31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> This is a bit of an unnecessary massive churn. No one expects the
> author named in the file to stay up to date, especially because the
> @domain.com usually credits the company who paid for the code, so it's
> left in as a kind of mark of respect for them. I'm not saying it
> applies in your case, just that it creates the common expectation of
> in-file authors needing to be traced through the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Could you not just update the MAINTAINERS file only, like everyone else?
OK, I did not know this. The Panasas credit is still there so no
harm done. Anyway Linus pulled it, so lets leave it at that for now.
Next time I'll know.
> James
Thanks
Boaz
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:04:12PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Hi Sir Linus
> >
> > A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me.
> > I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the
> > end.
> > Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is
> > ZERO risk, just change of email.
> >
> > Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17
> >
> > 3 patches available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5:
> >
> > Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Boaz Harrosh (3):
> > MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email
> > Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address
> > Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation
> >
> > Documentation/scsi/osd.txt | 3 +--
> > MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/exofs/Kbuild | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/common.h | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/file.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/namei.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/ore.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/ore_raid.h | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/symlink.c | 2 +-
> > fs/exofs/sys.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 2 +-
> > fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h | 2 +-
> > include/scsi/osd_initiator.h | 2 +-
> > include/scsi/osd_ore.h | 2 +-
> > include/scsi/osd_protocol.h | 4 ++--
> > include/scsi/osd_sec.h | 2 +-
> > include/scsi/osd_sense.h | 2 +-
> > include/scsi/osd_types.h | 2 +-
> > 31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> This is a bit of an unnecessary massive churn. No one expects the
> author named in the file to stay up to date, especially because the
> @domain.com usually credits the company who paid for the code, so it's
> left in as a kind of mark of respect for them. I'm not saying it
> applies in your case, just that it creates the common expectation of
> in-file authors needing to be traced through the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Could you not just update the MAINTAINERS file only, like everyone else?
I guess there's also .mailmap, though it doesn't look like that's being
used much.
--b.