2024-02-29 09:42:39

by kunwu.chan

Subject: [PATCH] nfs: use KMEM_CACHE() to create nfs_commit_data cache

From: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>

Use the KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of kmem_cache_create() to simplify
the creation of SLAB caches when the default values are used.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/write.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index bb79d3a886ae..6a75772d447f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -2148,10 +2148,7 @@ int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
if (nfs_wdata_mempool == NULL)
goto out_destroy_write_cache;

- nfs_cdata_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs_commit_data",
- sizeof(struct nfs_commit_data),
- 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
- NULL);
+ nfs_cdata_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nfs_commit_data, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
if (nfs_cdata_cachep == NULL)
goto out_destroy_write_mempool;

--
2.39.2

2024-02-29 13:40:17

by Trond Myklebust

Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: use KMEM_CACHE() to create nfs_commit_data cache

On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 17:41 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
>
> Use the KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of kmem_cache_create() to simplify
> the creation of SLAB caches when the default values are used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/write.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index bb79d3a886ae..6a75772d447f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -2148,10 +2148,7 @@ int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
>   if (nfs_wdata_mempool == NULL)
>   goto out_destroy_write_cache;
>  
> - nfs_cdata_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs_commit_data",
> -      sizeof(struct
> nfs_commit_data),
> -      0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
> -      NULL);
> + nfs_cdata_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nfs_commit_data,
> SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
>   if (nfs_cdata_cachep == NULL)
>   goto out_destroy_write_mempool;

If this were being done as part of an actual functional code change,
then I'd be OK with it, but otherwise it is just unnecessary churn that
gets in the way of back porting any future fixes.


--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
[email protected]