From: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
Commit de144ff4234f changes _pnfs_return_layout() to call
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() passing NULL as the struct
pnfs_layout_range argument. Unfortunately,
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() doesn't check if we have a value here
before dereferencing it, causing an oops.
I'm able to hit this crash consistently when running connectathon basic
tests on NFS v4.1/v4.2 against Ontap.
Fixes: de144ff4234f ("NFSv4: Don't discard segments marked for return in _pnfs_return_layout()")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 03e0b34c4a64..6d720afb7b70 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2484,12 +2484,12 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
set_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &lseg->pls_flags);
}
- if (remaining) {
+ if (remaining && return_range) {
pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode, seq);
return -EBUSY;
}
- if (!list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
+ if (return_range && !list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode, seq);
return 0;
}
--
2.29.2
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 12:06 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
>
> Commit de144ff4234f changes _pnfs_return_layout() to call
> pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() passing NULL as the struct
> pnfs_layout_range argument. Unfortunately,
> pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() doesn't check if we have a value
> here
> before dereferencing it, causing an oops.
>
> I'm able to hit this crash consistently when running connectathon
> basic
> tests on NFS v4.1/v4.2 against Ontap.
>
> Fixes: de144ff4234f ("NFSv4: Don't discard segments marked for return
> in _pnfs_return_layout()")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 03e0b34c4a64..6d720afb7b70 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -2484,12 +2484,12 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(struct
> pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> set_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &lseg-
> >pls_flags);
> }
>
> - if (remaining) {
> + if (remaining && return_range) {
> pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode,
> seq);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - if (!list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
> + if (return_range && !list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
> pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode,
> seq);
> return 0;
This patch would mean we fail to mark the layout for return in
situations where we clearly should be doing so. The lack of a
return_range doesn't indicate that we don't want to return any layouts,
but rather that we want to return all layouts.
I suggest rather changing the caller, _pnfs_return_layout() to move
that declaration of 'struct pnfs_layout_range range' out of the if
statement so that it can be passed as an argument instead of NULL.
> }
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
[email protected]
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:43 PM Trond Myklebust
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 12:06 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
> >
> > Commit de144ff4234f changes _pnfs_return_layout() to call
> > pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() passing NULL as the struct
> > pnfs_layout_range argument. Unfortunately,
> > pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() doesn't check if we have a value
> > here
> > before dereferencing it, causing an oops.
> >
> > I'm able to hit this crash consistently when running connectathon
> > basic
> > tests on NFS v4.1/v4.2 against Ontap.
> >
> > Fixes: de144ff4234f ("NFSv4: Don't discard segments marked for return
> > in _pnfs_return_layout()")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> > index 03e0b34c4a64..6d720afb7b70 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> > @@ -2484,12 +2484,12 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(struct
> > pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> > set_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &lseg-
> > >pls_flags);
> > }
> >
> > - if (remaining) {
> > + if (remaining && return_range) {
> > pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode,
> > seq);
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
> > + if (return_range && !list_empty(&lo->plh_return_segs)) {
> > pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, return_range->iomode,
> > seq);
> > return 0;
>
> This patch would mean we fail to mark the layout for return in
> situations where we clearly should be doing so. The lack of a
> return_range doesn't indicate that we don't want to return any layouts,
> but rather that we want to return all layouts.
>
> I suggest rather changing the caller, _pnfs_return_layout() to move
> that declaration of 'struct pnfs_layout_range range' out of the if
> statement so that it can be passed as an argument instead of NULL.
Sure, I'll try that now.
Thanks!
Anna
>
> > }
>
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> [email protected]
>
>