2016-09-20 05:03:47

by Chunyan Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] sunrpc: queue work on system_pow er_efficient_wq

Resend behalf on Ke Wang.

Thanks,
Chunyan

On 20 September 2016 at 10:33, Ke Wang (=E7=8E=8B=E7=A7=91) <Ke.Wang@spread=
trum.com> wrote:
> May I have any comments for this patch?
> or
> This patch can be merged directly into next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Ke
> ________________________________________
> =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
> =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2016=E5=B9=B49=E6=9C=882=E6=97=A5 2=
:46
> =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Chunyan Zhang; [email protected]=
om; [email protected]; [email protected]
> =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: [email protected]; [email protected]; li=
[email protected]; Ke Wang (=E7=8E=8B=E7=A7=91)
> =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: queue work on system_power_effici=
ent_wq
>
> On 09/01/2016 03:30 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Ke Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> sunrpc uses workqueue to clean cache regulary. There is no real dependen=
cy
>> of executing work on the cpu which queueing it.
>>
>> On a idle system, especially for a heterogeneous systems like big.LITTLE=
,
>> it is observed that the big idle cpu was woke up many times just to serv=
ice
>> this work, which against the principle of power saving. It would be bett=
er
>> if we can schedule it on a cpu which the scheduler believes to be the mo=
st
>> appropriate one.
>>
>> After apply this patch, system_wq will be replaced by
>> system_power_efficient_wq for sunrpc. This functionality is enabled when
>> CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected.
>
> Makes sense to me, but I'm a little surprised that there isn't a "schedul=
e_delayed_power_efficient_work()" function to match how the normal workqueu=
e is used.
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ke Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
>> index 4d8e11f..8aabe12 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ void sunrpc_init_cache_detail(struct cache_detail *c=
d)
>> spin_unlock(&cache_list_lock);
>>
>> /* start the cleaning process */
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&cache_cleaner, 0);
>> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &cache_cleaner, 0);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_init_cache_detail);
>>
>> @@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ static void do_cache_clean(struct work_struct *work)
>> delay =3D 0;
>>
>> if (delay)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&cache_cleaner, delay);
>> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
>> + &cache_cleaner, delay);
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>