Michael, the IETF mailing list is really not the right place to ask about
commercial solutions in general or linux solutions in particular.
Cc'ing the linux-nfs mailing list. Comments in line below.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Michael Maymann <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm setting up a new BIO-HPC facility and are looking for a fault
> tolerant, scalable, fast and priceeffective storage solution.
>
> I have been looking at Coraid, Panasas and Lustre, but would like to
> investigate my options also of building my own PNFS solution. Clients are
> all Debian based.
>
> Can anyone recommend:
> 1. If PNFS is ready for production or if I should stick with a commercial
> vendor or build a Lustre solution ?
>
There is no pNFS server implementation in upstream linux yet.
We maintain a development out-of-kernel tree in git://
linux-nfs.org/~bhalevy/linux-pnfs.git
but it is not production ready.
> 2. PNFS Metadata server SW prefferably for Debian ?
>
ditto #1
> 3. PNFS Diskshelfs to be used ?
>
In pNFS terminology, these are Data Servers.
> 4. If AOE (ATA Over Ethernet) would make any sense together with PNFS ?
>
Maybe using the Block layout and AoE as the block storage transport
protocol.
> 5. PNFS GUI SW prefferably for Debian ?
>
ditto #1
> Thanks in advance :-) !
>
> BR.
> ~Maymann
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>