Should this be merged independently (and sooner? in rc5?)
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 8:04 AM David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > +struct cifs_fscache_inode_key {
> > > +
> > > + __le64 uniqueid; /* server inode number */
> > > + __le64 createtime; /* creation time on server */
> > > + u8 type; /* S_IFMT file type */
> > > +} __packed;
> > > +
> >
> > Interesting. So the uniqueid of the inode is not unique within the fs?
> > Or are the clients are mounting shares that span multiple filesystems?
> > Or, are we looking at a situation where the uniqueid is being quickly
> > reused for new inodes after the original inode is unlinked?
>
> The problem is that it's not unique over time. creat(); unlink(); creat();
> may yield a repeat of the uniqueid. It's like i_ino in that respect.
>
> David
>
--
Thanks,
Steve