2015-02-06 02:59:40

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] NFSv4: Ensure we reference the inode for return-on-close in delegreturn

If we have to do a return-on-close in the delegreturn code, then
we must ensure that the inode and super block remain referenced.

Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # 3.17.x
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/internal.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
fs/nfs/super.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/internal.h b/fs/nfs/internal.h
index a98cf2006179..21469e6e3834 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/internal.h
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ extern struct rpc_stat nfs_rpcstat;

extern int __init register_nfs_fs(void);
extern void __exit unregister_nfs_fs(void);
-extern void nfs_sb_active(struct super_block *sb);
+extern bool nfs_sb_active(struct super_block *sb);
extern void nfs_sb_deactive(struct super_block *sb);

/* namespace.c */
@@ -514,6 +514,26 @@ extern int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_client *clp,
struct nfs_client **result,
struct rpc_cred *cred);

+static inline struct inode *nfs_igrab_and_active(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ inode = igrab(inode);
+ if (inode != NULL && !nfs_sb_active(inode->i_sb)) {
+ iput(inode);
+ inode = NULL;
+ }
+ return inode;
+}
+
+static inline void nfs_iput_and_deactive(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (inode != NULL) {
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+
+ iput(inode);
+ nfs_sb_deactive(sb);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Determine the device name as a string
*/
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index cd4295d84d54..dd892a4e7eb3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5175,9 +5175,13 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
static void nfs4_delegreturn_release(void *calldata)
{
struct nfs4_delegreturndata *data = calldata;
+ struct inode *inode = data->inode;

- if (data->roc)
- pnfs_roc_release(data->inode);
+ if (inode) {
+ if (data->roc)
+ pnfs_roc_release(inode);
+ nfs_iput_and_deactive(inode);
+ }
kfree(calldata);
}

@@ -5234,9 +5238,9 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct inode *inode, struct rpc_cred *cred, co
nfs_fattr_init(data->res.fattr);
data->timestamp = jiffies;
data->rpc_status = 0;
- data->inode = inode;
- data->roc = list_empty(&NFS_I(inode)->open_files) ?
- pnfs_roc(inode) : false;
+ data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(inode);
+ if (data->inode)
+ data->roc = nfs4_roc(inode);

task_setup_data.callback_data = data;
msg.rpc_argp = &data->args;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 31a11b0e885d..368d9395d2e7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -405,12 +405,15 @@ void __exit unregister_nfs_fs(void)
unregister_filesystem(&nfs_fs_type);
}

-void nfs_sb_active(struct super_block *sb)
+bool nfs_sb_active(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SB(sb);

- if (atomic_inc_return(&server->active) == 1)
- atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
+ if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
+ return false;
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&server->active) != 1)
+ atomic_dec(&sb->s_active);
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_sb_active);

--
2.1.0



2015-02-06 02:59:41

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] NFSv4.1: Pin the inode and super block in asynchronous layoutcommit

If we're sending an asynchronous layoutcommit, then we need to ensure
that the inode and the super block remain pinned.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index dd892a4e7eb3..e092b8540e2e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -7989,6 +7989,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutcommit_release(void *calldata)
nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(data->args.inode,
data->res.fattr);
put_rpccred(data->cred);
+ nfs_iput_and_deactive(data->inode);
kfree(data);
}

@@ -8013,7 +8014,6 @@ nfs4_proc_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data, bool sync)
.rpc_message = &msg,
.callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutcommit_ops,
.callback_data = data,
- .flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
};
struct rpc_task *task;
int status = 0;
@@ -8024,18 +8024,21 @@ nfs4_proc_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data, bool sync)
data->args.lastbytewritten,
data->args.inode->i_ino);

+ if (!sync) {
+ data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(data->args.inode);
+ if (data->inode == NULL) {
+ nfs4_layoutcommit_release(data);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+ task_setup_data.flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC;
+ }
nfs4_init_sequence(&data->args.seq_args, &data->res.seq_res, 1);
task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
if (IS_ERR(task))
return PTR_ERR(task);
- if (sync == false)
- goto out;
- status = nfs4_wait_for_completion_rpc_task(task);
- if (status != 0)
- goto out;
- status = task->tk_status;
+ if (sync)
+ status = task->tk_status;
trace_nfs4_layoutcommit(data->args.inode, status);
-out:
dprintk("%s: status %d\n", __func__, status);
rpc_put_task(task);
return status;
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index 2c35e2affa6f..bb0d56f737e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data {
struct nfs_fattr fattr;
struct list_head lseg_list;
struct rpc_cred *cred;
+ struct inode *inode;
struct nfs4_layoutcommit_args args;
struct nfs4_layoutcommit_res res;
};
--
2.1.0


2015-02-06 02:59:42

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] NFSv4.1: Pin the inode and super block in asynchronous layoutreturns

If we're sending an asynchronous layoutreturn, then we need to ensure
that the inode and the super block remain pinned.

Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index e092b8540e2e..2e7c9f7a6f7c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -7856,6 +7856,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_release(void *calldata)
lo->plh_block_lgets--;
spin_unlock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lrp->args.layout);
+ nfs_iput_and_deactive(lrp->inode);
kfree(calldata);
dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
}
@@ -7880,23 +7881,25 @@ int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool sync)
.rpc_message = &msg,
.callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops,
.callback_data = lrp,
- .flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
};
int status = 0;

dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
+ if (!sync) {
+ lrp->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(lrp->args.inode);
+ if (!lrp->inode) {
+ nfs4_layoutreturn_release(lrp);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+ task_setup_data.flags |= RPC_TASK_ASYNC;
+ }
nfs4_init_sequence(&lrp->args.seq_args, &lrp->res.seq_res, 1);
task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
if (IS_ERR(task))
return PTR_ERR(task);
- if (sync == false)
- goto out;
- status = nfs4_wait_for_completion_rpc_task(task);
- if (status != 0)
- goto out;
- status = task->tk_status;
+ if (sync)
+ status = task->tk_status;
trace_nfs4_layoutreturn(lrp->args.inode, status);
-out:
dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
rpc_put_task(task);
return status;
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index bb0d56f737e0..38d96ba935c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn {
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res res;
struct rpc_cred *cred;
struct nfs_client *clp;
+ struct inode *inode;
int rpc_status;
};

--
2.1.0


2015-02-06 02:59:44

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] NFSv4.1: pnfs_send_layoutreturn should use GFP_NOFS

In we want to be able to call pnfs_send_layoutreturn() from within the
writeback path, we really want it to use GFP_NOFS in order to prevent
recursion.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 703501d3ed19..a1d8620e8cb7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ pnfs_send_layoutreturn(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, nfs4_stateid stateid,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp;
int status = 0;

- lrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*lrp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ lrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*lrp), GFP_NOFS);
if (unlikely(lrp == NULL)) {
status = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
--
2.1.0


2015-02-06 02:59:45

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] NFSv4.1: Fix pnfs_put_lseg races

pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async() can also race with inode put in
the general case. We can now fix this, and also simplify the code.

Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index a1d8620e8cb7..79878611fdb0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -361,14 +361,9 @@ pnfs_layout_need_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
return true;
}

-static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
+static void pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
+ struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct inode *inode)
{
- struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
- struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
- struct inode *inode;
-
- lseg = container_of(work, struct pnfs_layout_segment, pls_work);
- WARN_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount));
lo = lseg->pls_layout;
inode = lo->plh_inode;

@@ -383,24 +378,11 @@ static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
lo->plh_block_lgets++;
lo->plh_return_iomode = 0;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);

- pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, true);
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- } else
- /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #2 in pnfs_put_lseg */
- pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
- pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
- /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #1 in pnfs_put_lseg */
- pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
-}
-
-static void
-pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
-{
- INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg);
- queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &lseg->pls_work);
+ /* Send an async layoutreturn so we dont deadlock */
+ pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, false);
+ }
}

void
@@ -415,21 +397,23 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount),
test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
+
+ /* Handle the case where refcount != 1 */
+ if (atomic_add_unless(&lseg->pls_refcount, -1, 1))
+ return;
+
lo = lseg->pls_layout;
inode = lo->plh_inode;
+ /* Do we need a layoutreturn? */
+ if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg))
+ pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(lseg, lo, inode);
+
if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lseg->pls_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
- if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg)) {
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- /* hdr reference dropped in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
- pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
- pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(lseg);
- } else {
- pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
- pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
- }
+ pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
+ pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg);
--
2.1.0


2015-02-06 03:38:49

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] NFSv4.1: Fix pnfs_put_lseg races

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Trond Myklebust
<[email protected]> wrote:
> pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async() can also race with inode put in
> the general case. We can now fix this, and also simplify the code.
>
> Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index a1d8620e8cb7..79878611fdb0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -361,14 +361,9 @@ pnfs_layout_need_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
> + struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct inode *inode)
> {
> - struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
> - struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
> - struct inode *inode;
> -
> - lseg = container_of(work, struct pnfs_layout_segment, pls_work);
> - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount));
> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
> inode = lo->plh_inode;
>
> @@ -383,24 +378,11 @@ static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
> lo->plh_block_lgets++;
> lo->plh_return_iomode = 0;
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>
> - pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, true);
> - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> - } else
> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #2 in pnfs_put_lseg */
> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #1 in pnfs_put_lseg */
> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> -{
> - INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg);
> - queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &lseg->pls_work);
> + /* Send an async layoutreturn so we dont deadlock */
> + pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, false);
> + }
> }
>
> void
> @@ -415,21 +397,23 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
> atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount),
> test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
> +
> + /* Handle the case where refcount != 1 */
> + if (atomic_add_unless(&lseg->pls_refcount, -1, 1))
> + return;
> +
> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
> inode = lo->plh_inode;
> + /* Do we need a layoutreturn? */
> + if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg))
pnfs_layout_need_return() needs inode->i_lock protection because it
iterates lo->plh_segs list.

> + pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(lseg, lo, inode);
> +
> if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lseg->pls_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
> pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
> - if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg)) {
> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - /* hdr reference dropped in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
> - pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
> - pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(lseg);
> - } else {
> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
> - }
> + pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
This might end up removing lseg before actually sending out
layoutreturn. And it can affect return-on-close handling such that we
send close while still having lseg at hand. That said, I don't see it
a problem because it only happens when we are about to free the lseg
anyway so no one can use it for I/O at this point.

Cheers,
Tao
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
> + pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg);
> --
> 2.1.0
>

2015-02-06 04:37:56

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] NFSv4.1: Fix pnfs_put_lseg races

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Peng Tao <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Trond Myklebust
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async() can also race with inode put in
>> the general case. We can now fix this, and also simplify the code.
>>
>> Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> index a1d8620e8cb7..79878611fdb0 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> @@ -361,14 +361,9 @@ pnfs_layout_need_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
>> +static void pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>> + struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct inode *inode)
>> {
>> - struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>> - struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
>> - struct inode *inode;
>> -
>> - lseg = container_of(work, struct pnfs_layout_segment, pls_work);
>> - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount));
>> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
>> inode = lo->plh_inode;
>>
>> @@ -383,24 +378,11 @@ static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
>> lo->plh_block_lgets++;
>> lo->plh_return_iomode = 0;
>> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> + pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>>
>> - pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, true);
>> - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>> - } else
>> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #2 in pnfs_put_lseg */
>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #1 in pnfs_put_lseg */
>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void
>> -pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>> -{
>> - INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg);
>> - queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &lseg->pls_work);
>> + /* Send an async layoutreturn so we dont deadlock */
>> + pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, false);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> void
>> @@ -415,21 +397,23 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>> dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
>> atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount),
>> test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
>> +
>> + /* Handle the case where refcount != 1 */
>> + if (atomic_add_unless(&lseg->pls_refcount, -1, 1))
>> + return;
>> +
>> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
>> inode = lo->plh_inode;
>> + /* Do we need a layoutreturn? */
>> + if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg))
> pnfs_layout_need_return() needs inode->i_lock protection because it
> iterates lo->plh_segs list.

Ack. I'll put out a v3 that changes that.

>
>> + pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(lseg, lo, inode);
>> +
>> if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lseg->pls_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
>> pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>> - if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg)) {
>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> - /* hdr reference dropped in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
>> - pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>> - pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(lseg);
>> - } else {
>> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>> - }
>> + pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
> This might end up removing lseg before actually sending out
> layoutreturn. And it can affect return-on-close handling such that we
> send close while still having lseg at hand. That said, I don't see it
> a problem because it only happens when we are about to free the lseg
> anyway so no one can use it for I/O at this point.

So, this is the exact point of doing the layoutreturn _before_ we do
the final test of lseg->pls_refcount. It means that we can ensure that
the lseg is still around.

The danger here is not so much missing a layoutreturn due to a race
(although that is not optimal), but rather it is leaving the lseg
attached to the layout header, but with lseg->pls_refcount == 0. If
the refcount is bumped in that situation, then bad things can happen
(the lseg can get freed while we're doing the layoutreturn).
Also there is the danger of the inode disappearing from underneath us,
as stated in the changelog.

Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
[email protected]

2015-02-06 07:00:51

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] NFSv4.1: Fix pnfs_put_lseg races

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Trond Myklebust
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Peng Tao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Trond Myklebust
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async() can also race with inode put in
>>> the general case. We can now fix this, and also simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> index a1d8620e8cb7..79878611fdb0 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> @@ -361,14 +361,9 @@ pnfs_layout_need_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +static void pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>>> + struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, struct inode *inode)
>>> {
>>> - struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>>> - struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
>>> - struct inode *inode;
>>> -
>>> - lseg = container_of(work, struct pnfs_layout_segment, pls_work);
>>> - WARN_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount));
>>> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
>>> inode = lo->plh_inode;
>>>
>>> @@ -383,24 +378,11 @@ static void pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg(struct work_struct *work)
>>> lo->plh_block_lgets++;
>>> lo->plh_return_iomode = 0;
>>> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> + pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>>>
>>> - pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, true);
>>> - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> - } else
>>> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #2 in pnfs_put_lseg */
>>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>>> - /* match pnfs_get_layout_hdr #1 in pnfs_put_lseg */
>>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void
>>> -pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>> -{
>>> - INIT_WORK(&lseg->pls_work, pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg);
>>> - queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &lseg->pls_work);
>>> + /* Send an async layoutreturn so we dont deadlock */
>>> + pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode, false);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> void
>>> @@ -415,21 +397,23 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>> dprintk("%s: lseg %p ref %d valid %d\n", __func__, lseg,
>>> atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount),
>>> test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
>>> +
>>> + /* Handle the case where refcount != 1 */
>>> + if (atomic_add_unless(&lseg->pls_refcount, -1, 1))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> lo = lseg->pls_layout;
>>> inode = lo->plh_inode;
>>> + /* Do we need a layoutreturn? */
>>> + if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg))
>> pnfs_layout_need_return() needs inode->i_lock protection because it
>> iterates lo->plh_segs list.
>
> Ack. I'll put out a v3 that changes that.
>
>>
>>> + pnfs_layoutreturn_before_put_lseg(lseg, lo, inode);
>>> +
>>> if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lseg->pls_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
>>> pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> - if (pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg)) {
>>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> - /* hdr reference dropped in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
>>> - pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> - pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lseg_async(lseg);
>>> - } else {
>>> - pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>>> - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> - pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>>> - pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> - }
>>> + pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>> This might end up removing lseg before actually sending out
>> layoutreturn. And it can affect return-on-close handling such that we
>> send close while still having lseg at hand. That said, I don't see it
>> a problem because it only happens when we are about to free the lseg
>> anyway so no one can use it for I/O at this point.
>
> So, this is the exact point of doing the layoutreturn _before_ we do
> the final test of lseg->pls_refcount. It means that we can ensure that
> the lseg is still around.
>
> The danger here is not so much missing a layoutreturn due to a race
> (although that is not optimal), but rather it is leaving the lseg
> attached to the layout header, but with lseg->pls_refcount == 0. If
> the refcount is bumped in that situation, then bad things can happen
> (the lseg can get freed while we're doing the layoutreturn).
That, is in fact OK. We have NFS_LSEG_VALID flag that holds the
initial reference. If we reach lseg->pls_refcount == 0, NFS_LSEG_VALID
must have already been cleared by someone. Then no one can find the
lseg in lo->plh_segs list because pnfs_find_lseg() check for the
NFS_LSEG_VALID flag. The only one that still has access to the lseg is
the current thread and it is going to free it.

> Also there is the danger of the inode disappearing from underneath us,
> as stated in the changelog.
Yup.

Cheers,
Tao
>
> Cheers
> Trond
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
> [email protected]

2015-02-06 03:13:14

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] NFSv4.1: Pin the inode and super block in asynchronous layoutreturns

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Trond Myklebust
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If we're sending an asynchronous layoutreturn, then we need to ensure
> that the inode and the super block remain pinned.
>
Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index e092b8540e2e..2e7c9f7a6f7c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -7856,6 +7856,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_release(void *calldata)
> lo->plh_block_lgets--;
> spin_unlock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
> pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lrp->args.layout);
> + nfs_iput_and_deactive(lrp->inode);
> kfree(calldata);
> dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
> }
> @@ -7880,23 +7881,25 @@ int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool sync)
> .rpc_message = &msg,
> .callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops,
> .callback_data = lrp,
> - .flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
> };
> int status = 0;
>
> dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
> + if (!sync) {
> + lrp->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(lrp->args.inode);
> + if (!lrp->inode) {
> + nfs4_layoutreturn_release(lrp);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + task_setup_data.flags |= RPC_TASK_ASYNC;
> + }
> nfs4_init_sequence(&lrp->args.seq_args, &lrp->res.seq_res, 1);
> task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
> if (IS_ERR(task))
> return PTR_ERR(task);
> - if (sync == false)
> - goto out;
> - status = nfs4_wait_for_completion_rpc_task(task);
> - if (status != 0)
> - goto out;
> - status = task->tk_status;
> + if (sync)
> + status = task->tk_status;
> trace_nfs4_layoutreturn(lrp->args.inode, status);
> -out:
> dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
> rpc_put_task(task);
> return status;
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> index bb0d56f737e0..38d96ba935c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn {
> struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res res;
> struct rpc_cred *cred;
> struct nfs_client *clp;
> + struct inode *inode;
> int rpc_status;
> };
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>

2015-02-06 03:09:44

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] NFSv4.1: Pin the inode and super block in asynchronous layoutcommit

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Trond Myklebust
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If we're sending an asynchronous layoutcommit, then we need to ensure
> that the inode and the super block remain pinned.
>
Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index dd892a4e7eb3..e092b8540e2e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -7989,6 +7989,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutcommit_release(void *calldata)
> nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(data->args.inode,
> data->res.fattr);
> put_rpccred(data->cred);
> + nfs_iput_and_deactive(data->inode);
> kfree(data);
> }
>
> @@ -8013,7 +8014,6 @@ nfs4_proc_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data, bool sync)
> .rpc_message = &msg,
> .callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutcommit_ops,
> .callback_data = data,
> - .flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
> };
> struct rpc_task *task;
> int status = 0;
> @@ -8024,18 +8024,21 @@ nfs4_proc_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data, bool sync)
> data->args.lastbytewritten,
> data->args.inode->i_ino);
>
> + if (!sync) {
> + data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(data->args.inode);
> + if (data->inode == NULL) {
> + nfs4_layoutcommit_release(data);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + task_setup_data.flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC;
> + }
> nfs4_init_sequence(&data->args.seq_args, &data->res.seq_res, 1);
> task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
> if (IS_ERR(task))
> return PTR_ERR(task);
> - if (sync == false)
> - goto out;
> - status = nfs4_wait_for_completion_rpc_task(task);
> - if (status != 0)
> - goto out;
> - status = task->tk_status;
> + if (sync)
> + status = task->tk_status;
> trace_nfs4_layoutcommit(data->args.inode, status);
> -out:
> dprintk("%s: status %d\n", __func__, status);
> rpc_put_task(task);
> return status;
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> index 2c35e2affa6f..bb0d56f737e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data {
> struct nfs_fattr fattr;
> struct list_head lseg_list;
> struct rpc_cred *cred;
> + struct inode *inode;
> struct nfs4_layoutcommit_args args;
> struct nfs4_layoutcommit_res res;
> };
> --
> 2.1.0
>