2018-06-28 13:45:06

by Chuck Lever III

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Handle RPC_CANTDECODEARGS response in rpcbind query

We have a report that some commercial NFS file servers still do not
support rpcbind v4 correctly. They return RPC_CANTDECODEARGS instead
of RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH, so our rpcbind client now errors out
immediately instead of trying a lower rpcbind version.

To address this, convert the "if () else if () else if ()" to a
switch statement to make it straightforward to add new status codes
to the error processing logic. Then, add a case for
RPC_CANTDECODEARGS.

Reported-by: Yuan-Yao Sung <[email protected]>
Fixes: 5e7b57bc20bd ("rpcinfo: change order of version to be ... ")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Yuan-Yao Sung <[email protected]>
---
src/rpcb_clnt.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/rpcb_clnt.c b/src/rpcb_clnt.c
index 4b44364..d6fefd0 100644
--- a/src/rpcb_clnt.c
+++ b/src/rpcb_clnt.c
@@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf, host, clpp, tp)
struct netbuf *address = NULL;
rpcvers_t start_vers = RPCBVERS4;
struct netbuf servaddr;
+ struct rpc_err rpcerr;

/* parameter checking */
if (nconf == NULL) {
@@ -902,7 +903,8 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf, host, clpp, tp)
clnt_st = CLNT_CALL(client, (rpcproc_t)RPCBPROC_GETADDR,
(xdrproc_t) xdr_rpcb, (char *)(void *)&parms,
(xdrproc_t) xdr_wrapstring, (char *)(void *) &ua, *tp);
- if (clnt_st == RPC_SUCCESS) {
+ switch (clnt_st) {
+ case RPC_SUCCESS:
if ((ua == NULL) || (ua[0] == 0)) {
/* address unknown */
rpc_createerr.cf_stat = RPC_PROGNOTREGISTERED;
@@ -924,12 +926,15 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf, host, clpp, tp)
(char *)(void *)&servaddr);
__rpc_fixup_addr(address, &servaddr);
goto done;
- } else if (clnt_st == RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH) {
- struct rpc_err rpcerr;
+ case RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH:
clnt_geterr(client, &rpcerr);
if (rpcerr.re_vers.low > RPCBVERS4)
goto error; /* a new version, can't handle */
- } else if (clnt_st != RPC_PROGUNAVAIL) {
+ /* Try the next lower version */
+ case RPC_PROGUNAVAIL:
+ case RPC_CANTDECODEARGS:
+ break;
+ default:
/* Cant handle this error */
rpc_createerr.cf_stat = clnt_st;
clnt_geterr(client, &rpc_createerr.cf_error);



2018-06-28 14:17:32

by Trond Myklebust

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle RPC_CANTDECODEARGS response in rpcbind query
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2018-06-28 14:29:56

by Chuck Lever III

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle RPC_CANTDECODEARGS response in rpcbind query



> On Jun 28, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Trond Myklebust =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 09:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> We have a report that some commercial NFS file servers still do not
>> support rpcbind v4 correctly. They return RPC_CANTDECODEARGS instead
>> of RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH, so our rpcbind client now errors out
>> immediately instead of trying a lower rpcbind version.
>>=20
>> To address this, convert the "if () else if () else if ()" to a
>> switch statement to make it straightforward to add new status codes
>> to the error processing logic. Then, add a case for
>> RPC_CANTDECODEARGS.
>>=20
>> Reported-by: Yuan-Yao Sung <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: 5e7b57bc20bd ("rpcinfo: change order of version to be ... ")
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Yuan-Yao Sung <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> src/rpcb_clnt.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>=20
>> diff --git a/src/rpcb_clnt.c b/src/rpcb_clnt.c
>> index 4b44364..d6fefd0 100644
>> --- a/src/rpcb_clnt.c
>> +++ b/src/rpcb_clnt.c
>> @@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf,
>> host, clpp, tp)
>> struct netbuf *address =3D NULL;
>> rpcvers_t start_vers =3D RPCBVERS4;
>> struct netbuf servaddr;
>> + struct rpc_err rpcerr;
>>=20
>> /* parameter checking */
>> if (nconf =3D=3D NULL) {
>> @@ -902,7 +903,8 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf,
>> host, clpp, tp)
>> clnt_st =3D CLNT_CALL(client,
>> (rpcproc_t)RPCBPROC_GETADDR,
>> (xdrproc_t) xdr_rpcb, (char *)(void *)&parms,
>> (xdrproc_t) xdr_wrapstring, (char *)(void *)
>> &ua, *tp);
>> - if (clnt_st =3D=3D RPC_SUCCESS) {
>> + switch (clnt_st) {
>> + case RPC_SUCCESS:
>> if ((ua =3D=3D NULL) || (ua[0] =3D=3D 0)) {
>> /* address unknown */
>> rpc_createerr.cf_stat =3D
>> RPC_PROGNOTREGISTERED;
>> @@ -924,12 +926,15 @@ __rpcb_findaddr_timed(program, version, nconf,
>> host, clpp, tp)
>> (char *)(void *)&servaddr);
>> __rpc_fixup_addr(address, &servaddr);
>> goto done;
>> - } else if (clnt_st =3D=3D RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH) {
>> - struct rpc_err rpcerr;
>> + case RPC_PROGVERSMISMATCH:
>> clnt_geterr(client, &rpcerr);
>> if (rpcerr.re_vers.low > RPCBVERS4)
>> goto error; /* a new version, can't
>> handle */
>> - } else if (clnt_st !=3D RPC_PROGUNAVAIL) {
>> + /* Try the next lower version */
>> + case RPC_PROGUNAVAIL:
>> + case RPC_CANTDECODEARGS:
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> /* Cant handle this error */
>> rpc_createerr.cf_stat =3D clnt_st;
>> clnt_geterr(client,
>> &rpc_createerr.cf_error);
>>=20
>> --
>=20
> Interesting... Do these servers return any other non-sanctioned =
errors?

It's a NetApp filer. GARBAGE_ARGS is what goes on the wire.


> I can't find RPC_CANTDECODEARGS described in any of the official RFCs
> pertaining to RPC, NFS or the RPCBIND protocol. It appears to be =
listed
> among the private error codes in the libtirpc header files, and in =
some
> java libraries, but googling around appeared to indicate that those
> codes are intended for internal library signaling only, and should not
> appear on the wire:
>=20
> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jonah/javadoc/org/acplt/oncrpc/OncRp
> cException.html

RPC_CANTDECODEARGS is part of the public RPC API, it doesn't go on
the wire.

I will fix the patch description and resend.


--
Chuck Lever