2024-02-05 11:55:57

by Jeffrey Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/47] filelock: add some new helper functions

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:36 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > index 085ff6ba0653..a814664b1053 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > @@ -147,6 +147,29 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> > ?int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> > ?int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> > ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
> > +{
> > + return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool lock_is_read(struct file_lock *fl)
> > +{
> > + return fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool lock_is_write(struct file_lock *fl)
> > +{
> > + return fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
> > +{
> > + wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
> > +#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
> > +
>
> This causes a build warning for fs/ceph/ and fs/afs when
> !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING. I'm about to fold the following diff into this
> patch. The diff looks a bit wonky but essentially I've moved
> lock_is_unlock(), lock_is_{read,write}(), locks_wake_up() and
> for_each_file_lock() out of the ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING:
>

I sent a patch for this problem yesterday. Did you not get it?


> diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> index a814664b1053..62be9c6b1e59 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> @@ -133,20 +133,6 @@ struct file_lock_context {
> ????????struct list_head flc_lease;
> ?};
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING
> -int fcntl_getlk(struct file *, unsigned int, struct flock *);
> -int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> - struct flock *);
> -
> -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> -int fcntl_getlk64(struct file *, unsigned int, struct flock64 *);
> -int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> - struct flock64 *);
> -#endif
> -
> -int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> -int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> -
> ?static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
> ?{
> ????????return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
> @@ -170,6 +156,20 @@ static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
> ?/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
> ?#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING
> +int fcntl_getlk(struct file *, unsigned int, struct flock *);
> +int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> + struct flock *);
> +
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> +int fcntl_getlk64(struct file *, unsigned int, struct flock64 *);
> +int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> + struct flock64 *);
> +#endif
> +
> +int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> +int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> +
> ?/* fs/locks.c */
> ?void locks_free_lock_context(struct inode *inode);
> ?void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl);
>

--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>


2024-02-05 11:58:13

by Christian Brauner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/47] filelock: add some new helper functions

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 06:55:44AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:36 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > index 085ff6ba0653..a814664b1053 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > @@ -147,6 +147,29 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> > >  int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> > >  int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> > >  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > +{
> > > + return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool lock_is_read(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > +{
> > > + return fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool lock_is_write(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > +{
> > > + return fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > +{
> > > + wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
> > > +#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
> > > +
> >
> > This causes a build warning for fs/ceph/ and fs/afs when
> > !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING. I'm about to fold the following diff into this
> > patch. The diff looks a bit wonky but essentially I've moved
> > lock_is_unlock(), lock_is_{read,write}(), locks_wake_up() and
> > for_each_file_lock() out of the ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING:
> >
>
> I sent a patch for this problem yesterday. Did you not get it?

Whoops, probably missed it on the trip back from fosdem.
I'll double check now.

2024-02-05 12:11:10

by Jeffrey Layton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/47] filelock: add some new helper functions

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:57 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 06:55:44AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:36 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > index 085ff6ba0653..a814664b1053 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > @@ -147,6 +147,29 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> > > > ?int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> > > > ?int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool lock_is_read(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool lock_is_write(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > +{
> > > > + wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
> > > > +#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
> > > > +
> > >
> > > This causes a build warning for fs/ceph/ and fs/afs when
> > > !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING. I'm about to fold the following diff into this
> > > patch. The diff looks a bit wonky but essentially I've moved
> > > lock_is_unlock(), lock_is_{read,write}(), locks_wake_up() and
> > > for_each_file_lock() out of the ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING:
> > >
> >
> > I sent a patch for this problem yesterday. Did you not get it?
>
> Whoops, probably missed it on the trip back from fosdem.
> I'll double check now.

No worries. If you choose to go with your version, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

2024-02-05 12:20:24

by Christian Brauner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/47] filelock: add some new helper functions

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:06:00AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:57 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 06:55:44AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 12:36 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > > index 085ff6ba0653..a814664b1053 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> > > > > @@ -147,6 +147,29 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int, struct file *, unsigned int,
> > > > >  int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, int arg);
> > > > >  int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> > > > >  
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +static inline bool lock_is_unlock(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline bool lock_is_read(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline bool lock_is_write(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* for walking lists of file_locks linked by fl_list */
> > > > > +#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head) list_for_each_entry(_fl, _head, fl_list)
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > This causes a build warning for fs/ceph/ and fs/afs when
> > > > !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING. I'm about to fold the following diff into this
> > > > patch. The diff looks a bit wonky but essentially I've moved
> > > > lock_is_unlock(), lock_is_{read,write}(), locks_wake_up() and
> > > > for_each_file_lock() out of the ifdef CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING:
> > > >
> > >
> > > I sent a patch for this problem yesterday. Did you not get it?
> >
> > Whoops, probably missed it on the trip back from fosdem.
> > I'll double check now.
>
> No worries. If you choose to go with your version, you can add:

No, I took yours. :)