_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Hi Cidorvan,
> > The other macros are not being used and I had intended to remove them.
> > We use only MUL/MULA.
> >
> > > My idea would be to keep the semantic of MULA and only make it a two
> > > stage thing. In case of no assembler we still use MULA as it is right
> > > now, but in case of assembler it calls MULA_ARM which will do the
> > > calculations and then the assignment. Will this work? Is the compiler
> > > smart enough to optimize the code properly.
> >
> > I don't know how to do this but maybe Cidorvan can see it.
> >
>
> Like you can see in my first e-mail (gcc-no-arm-optimization.txt), gcc
> wasn't smart enough to optimize assignments.
> The reason to do a macro with assembly code is to force the gcc to use
> the right instruction (smlal) and keep the output code clean.
I think you didn't get my idea, but I also have no time to actually put
it into code right now. So I wanna have the semantics of all macros the
same. According to Brad, the others can be removed. If so, then I am
fine with this change.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Hi!
On Jan 30, 2008 4:26 PM, Brad Midgley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marcel
>
> The other macros are not being used and I had intended to remove them.
> We use only MUL/MULA.
>
> > My idea would be to keep the semantic of MULA and only make it a two
> > stage thing. In case of no assembler we still use MULA as it is right
> > now, but in case of assembler it calls MULA_ARM which will do the
> > calculations and then the assignment. Will this work? Is the compiler
> > smart enough to optimize the code properly.
>
> I don't know how to do this but maybe Cidorvan can see it.
>
Like you can see in my first e-mail (gcc-no-arm-optimization.txt), gcc
wasn't smart enough to optimize assignments.
The reason to do a macro with assembly code is to force the gcc to use
the right instruction (smlal) and keep the output code clean.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Marcel
The other macros are not being used and I had intended to remove them.
We use only MUL/MULA.
> My idea would be to keep the semantic of MULA and only make it a two
> stage thing. In case of no assembler we still use MULA as it is right
> now, but in case of assembler it calls MULA_ARM which will do the
> calculations and then the assignment. Will this work? Is the compiler
> smart enough to optimize the code properly.
I don't know how to do this but maybe Cidorvan can see it.
--
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Hi Brad,
> Cidorvan has a new proposal. It shifts MUL/MULA around so the
> assignment happens outside the macro. The good news is the assembly is
> now limited to a single ifdef around the macro definition. If we had
> to define eg MIPS code or something specialized it would be relatively
> quick & clean.
>
> The tricky part is he nests the use of the macro. I'll show you how he
> formatted it. Formatting it in a traditional way will get messy
> quickly unfortunately.
this is tricky since the semantic of the other macros is different.
Having to separate semantics is a bad things. So changing the semantic
of MULA is a bad idea.
My idea would be to keep the semantic of MULA and only make it a two
stage thing. In case of no assembler we still use MULA as it is right
now, but in case of assembler it calls MULA_ARM which will do the
calculations and then the assignment. Will this work? Is the compiler
smart enough to optimize the code properly.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Guys
It may be useful to think of this as two different optimizations.
First, making assignment happen outside the macro and nesting macros;
second, adding an arm version of MULA.
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Marcel
Cidorvan has a new proposal. It shifts MUL/MULA around so the
assignment happens outside the macro. The good news is the assembly is
now limited to a single ifdef around the macro definition. If we had
to define eg MIPS code or something specialized it would be relatively
quick & clean.
The tricky part is he nests the use of the macro. I'll show you how he
formatted it. Formatting it in a traditional way will get messy
quickly unfortunately.
Index: sbc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/bluez/utils/sbc/sbc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -p -r1.57 sbc.c
--- sbc.c 29 Jan 2008 19:47:49 -0000 1.57
+++ sbc.c 30 Jan 2008 13:22:53 -0000
-614,7 +614,8 @@ static inline void sbc_synthesize_four(s
/* Distribute the new matrix value to the shifted position */
SBC_FIXED_0(res);
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
- MULA(res, synmatrix4[i][j], frame->sb_sample[blk][ch][j]);
+ res = MULA(synmatrix4[i][j],
+ frame->sb_sample[blk][ch][j], res);
state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]] = SCALE4_STAGED1(res);
}
-623,10 +624,10 @@ static inline void sbc_synthesize_four(s
k = (i + 4) & 0xf;
SBC_FIXED_0(res);
for (j = 0; j < 10; idx++) {
- MULA(res, state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]+j++],
- sbc_proto_4_40m0[idx]);
- MULA(res, state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][k]+j++],
- sbc_proto_4_40m1[idx]);
+ res = MULA(state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]+j++],
+ sbc_proto_4_40m0[idx], res);
+ res = MULA(state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][k]+j++],
+ sbc_proto_4_40m1[idx], res);
}
/* Store in output, Q0 */
-655,7 +656,8 @@ static inline void sbc_synthesize_eight(
SBC_FIXED_0(res);
for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
/* Q28 = Q15 * Q13 */
- MULA(res, synmatrix8[i][j], frame->sb_sample[blk][ch][j]);
+ res = MULA(synmatrix8[i][j],
+ frame->sb_sample[blk][ch][j], res);
}
/* Q10 */
state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]] = SCALE8_STAGED1(res);
-666,8 +668,10 @@ static inline void sbc_synthesize_eight(
k = (i + 8) & 0xf;
SBC_FIXED_0(res);
for (j = 0; j < 10; idx++) {
- MULA(res, state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]+j++], sbc_proto_8_80m0[idx]);
- MULA(res, state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][k]+j++], sbc_proto_8_80m1[idx]);
+ res = MULA(state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][i]+j++],
+ sbc_proto_8_80m0[idx], res);
+ res = MULA(state->V[ch][state->offset[ch][k]+j++],
+ sbc_proto_8_80m1[idx], res);
}
/* Store in output */
frame->pcm_sample[ch][blk * 8 + i] = SCALE8_STAGED2(res); // Q0
-708,67 +712,66 @@ static void sbc_encoder_init(struct sbc_
state->position[0] = state->position[1] = 9 * frame->subbands;
}
-
static inline void _sbc_analyze_four(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
{
- sbc_extended_t res;
sbc_fixed_t t[8];
sbc_extended_t s[5];
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[0], in[8] - in[32]); /* Q18 */
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[1], in[16] - in[24]);
- t[0] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res); /* Q8 */
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[2], in[1]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[3], in[9]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[4], in[17]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[5], in[25]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[6], in[33]);
- t[1] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[7], in[2]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[8], in[10]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[9], in[18]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[10], in[26]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[11], in[34]);
- t[2] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[12], in[3]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[13], in[11]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[14], in[19]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[15], in[27]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[16], in[35]);
- t[3] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[17], in[4] + in[36]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[18], in[12] + in[28]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[19], in[20]);
- t[4] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[16], in[5]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[15], in[13]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[14], in[21]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[13], in[29]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[12], in[37]);
- t[5] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
+ t[0] = SCALE4_STAGE1( /* Q8 */
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[0], in[8] - in[32], /* Q18 */
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[1], in[16] - in[24])));
+
+ t[1] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[2], in[1],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[3], in[9],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[4], in[17],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[5], in[25],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[6], in[33]))))));
+
+ t[2] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[7], in[2],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[8], in[10],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[9], in[18],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[10], in[26],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[11], in[34]))))));
+
+ t[3] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[12], in[3],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[13], in[11],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[14], in[19],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[15], in[27],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[16], in[35]))))));
+
+ t[4] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[17], in[4] + in[36],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[18], in[12] + in[28],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[19], in[20]))));
+
+ t[5] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[16], in[5],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[15], in[13],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[14], in[21],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[13], in[29],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[12], in[37]))))));
/* don't compute t[6]... this term always multiplies
* with cos(pi/2) = 0 */
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_4[6], in[7]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[5], in[15]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[4], in[23]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[3], in[31]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_4[2], in[39]);
- t[7] = SCALE4_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(s[0], _anamatrix4[0], t[0] + t[4]);
- MUL(s[1], _anamatrix4[2], t[2]);
- MUL(s[2], _anamatrix4[1], t[1] + t[3]);
- MULA(s[2], _anamatrix4[3], t[5]);
- MUL(s[3], _anamatrix4[3], t[1] + t[3]);
- MULA(s[3], _anamatrix4[1], - t[5] + t[7]);
- MUL(s[4], _anamatrix4[3], t[7]);
+ t[7] = SCALE4_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[6], in[7],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[5], in[15],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[4], in[23],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_4[3], in[31],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_4[2], in[39]))))));
+
+ s[0] = MUL( _anamatrix4[0], t[0] + t[4]);
+ s[1] = MUL( _anamatrix4[2], t[2]);
+ s[2] = MULA(_anamatrix4[1], t[1] + t[3],
+ MUL(_anamatrix4[3], t[5]));
+ s[3] = MULA(_anamatrix4[3], t[1] + t[3],
+ MUL(_anamatrix4[1], -t[5] + t[7]));
+ s[4] = MUL( _anamatrix4[3], t[7]);
+
out[0] = SCALE4_STAGE2( s[0] + s[1] + s[2] + s[4]); /* Q0 */
out[1] = SCALE4_STAGE2(-s[0] + s[1] + s[3]);
out[2] = SCALE4_STAGE2(-s[0] + s[1] - s[3]);
-796,117 +799,117 @@ static inline void sbc_analyze_four(stru
static inline void _sbc_analyze_eight(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
{
- sbc_extended_t res;
sbc_fixed_t t[8];
sbc_extended_t s[8];
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[0], (in[16] - in[64])); /* Q18 = Q18 * Q0 */
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[1], (in[32] - in[48]));
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[2], in[4]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[3], in[20]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[4], in[36]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[5], in[52]);
- t[0] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res); /* Q10 */
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[6], in[2]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[7], in[18]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[8], in[34]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[9], in[50]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[10], in[66]);
- t[1] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[11], in[1]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[12], in[17]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[13], in[33]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[14], in[49]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[15], in[65]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[16], in[3]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[17], in[19]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[18], in[35]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[19], in[51]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[20], in[67]);
- t[2] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[21], in[5]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[22], in[21]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[23], in[37]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[24], in[53]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[25], in[69]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[15], in[15]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[14], in[31]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[13], in[47]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[12], in[63]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[11], in[79]);
- t[3] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[26], in[6]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[27], in[22]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[28], in[38]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[29], in[54]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[30], in[70]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[10], in[14]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[9], in[30]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[8], in[46]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[7], in[62]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[6], in[78]);
- t[4] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[31], in[7]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[32], in[23]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[33], in[39]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[34], in[55]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[35], in[71]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[20], in[13]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[19], in[29]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[18], in[45]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[17], in[61]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[16], in[77]);
- t[5] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[36], in[8] + in[72]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[37], in[24] + in[56]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[38], in[40]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[39], in[12]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[5], in[28]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[4], in[44]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[3], in[60]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[2], in[76]);
- t[6] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(res, _sbc_proto_8[35], in[9]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[34], in[25]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[33], in[41]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[32], in[57]);
- MULA(res, _sbc_proto_8[31], in[73]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[25], in[11]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[24], in[27]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[23], in[43]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[22], in[59]);
- MULA(res, -_sbc_proto_8[21], in[75]);
- t[7] = SCALE8_STAGE1(res);
-
- MUL(s[0], _anamatrix8[0], t[0]); /* = Q14 * Q10 */
- MULA(s[0], _anamatrix8[1], t[6]);
- MUL(s[1], _anamatrix8[7], t[1]);
- MUL(s[2], _anamatrix8[2], t[2]);
- MULA(s[2], _anamatrix8[3], t[3]);
- MULA(s[2], _anamatrix8[4], t[5]);
- MULA(s[2], _anamatrix8[5], t[7]);
- MUL(s[3], _anamatrix8[6], t[4]);
- MUL(s[4], _anamatrix8[3], t[2]);
- MULA(s[4], -_anamatrix8[5], t[3]);
- MULA(s[4], -_anamatrix8[2], t[5]);
- MULA(s[4], -_anamatrix8[4], t[7]);
- MUL(s[5], _anamatrix8[4], t[2]);
- MULA(s[5], -_anamatrix8[2], t[3]);
- MULA(s[5], _anamatrix8[5], t[5]);
- MULA(s[5], _anamatrix8[3], t[7]);
- MUL(s[6], _anamatrix8[1], t[0]);
- MULA(s[6], -_anamatrix8[0], t[6]);
- MUL(s[7], _anamatrix8[5], t[2]);
- MULA(s[7], -_anamatrix8[4], t[3]);
- MULA(s[7], _anamatrix8[3], t[5]);
- MULA(s[7], -_anamatrix8[2], t[7]);
+ t[0] = SCALE8_STAGE1( /* Q10 */
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[0], (in[16] - in[64]), /* Q18 = Q18 * Q0 */
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[1], (in[32] - in[48]),
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[2], in[4],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[3], in[20],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[4], in[36],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_8[5], in[52])))))));
+
+ t[1] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[6], in[2],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[7], in[18],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[8], in[34],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[9], in[50],
+ MUL(_sbc_proto_8[10], in[66]))))));
+
+ t[2] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[11], in[1],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[12], in[17],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[13], in[33],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[14], in[49],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[15], in[65],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[16], in[3],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[17], in[19],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[18], in[35],
+ MULA(_sbc_proto_8[19], in[51],
+ MUL( _sbc_proto_8[20], in[67])))))))))));
+
+ t[3] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[21], in[5],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[22], in[21],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[23], in[37],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[24], in[53],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[25], in[69],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[15], in[15],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[14], in[31],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[13], in[47],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[12], in[63],
+ MUL( -_sbc_proto_8[11], in[79])))))))))));
+
+ t[4] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[26], in[6],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[27], in[22],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[28], in[38],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[29], in[54],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[30], in[70],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[10], in[14],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[9], in[30],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[8], in[46],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[7], in[62],
+ MUL( -_sbc_proto_8[6], in[78])))))))))));
+
+ t[5] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[31], in[7],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[32], in[23],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[33], in[39],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[34], in[55],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[35], in[71],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[20], in[13],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[19], in[29],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[18], in[45],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[17], in[61],
+ MUL( -_sbc_proto_8[16], in[77])))))))))));
+
+ t[6] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[36], (in[8] + in[72]),
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[37], (in[24] + in[56]),
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[38], in[40],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[39], in[12],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[5], in[28],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[4], in[44],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[3], in[60],
+ MUL( -_sbc_proto_8[2], in[76])))))))));
+
+ t[7] = SCALE8_STAGE1(
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[35], in[9],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[34], in[25],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[33], in[41],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[32], in[57],
+ MULA( _sbc_proto_8[31], in[73],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[25], in[11],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[24], in[27],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[23], in[43],
+ MULA(-_sbc_proto_8[22], in[59],
+ MUL( -_sbc_proto_8[21], in[75])))))))))));
+
+ s[0] = MULA( _anamatrix8[0], t[0],
+ MUL( _anamatrix8[1], t[6]));
+ s[1] = MUL( _anamatrix8[7], t[1]);
+ s[2] = MULA( _anamatrix8[2], t[2],
+ MULA( _anamatrix8[3], t[3],
+ MULA( _anamatrix8[4], t[5],
+ MUL( _anamatrix8[5], t[7]))));
+ s[3] = MUL( _anamatrix8[6], t[4]);
+ s[4] = MULA( _anamatrix8[3], t[2],
+ MULA(-_anamatrix8[5], t[3],
+ MULA(-_anamatrix8[2], t[5],
+ MUL( -_anamatrix8[4], t[7]))));
+ s[5] = MULA( _anamatrix8[4], t[2],
+ MULA(-_anamatrix8[2], t[3],
+ MULA( _anamatrix8[5], t[5],
+ MUL( _anamatrix8[3], t[7]))));
+ s[6] = MULA( _anamatrix8[1], t[0],
+ MUL( -_anamatrix8[0], t[6]));
+ s[7] = MULA( _anamatrix8[5], t[2],
+ MULA(-_anamatrix8[4], t[3],
+ MULA( _anamatrix8[3], t[5],
+ MUL( -_anamatrix8[2], t[7]))));
+
out[0] = SCALE8_STAGE2( s[0] + s[1] + s[2] + s[3]);
out[1] = SCALE8_STAGE2( s[1] - s[3] + s[4] + s[6]);
out[2] = SCALE8_STAGE2( s[1] - s[3] + s[5] - s[6]);
Index: sbc_math.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/bluez/utils/sbc/sbc_math.h,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 sbc_math.h
--- sbc_math.h 28 Jan 2008 18:00:51 -0000 1.12
+++ sbc_math.h 30 Jan 2008 13:22:53 -0000
-64,6 +64,17 @@ typedef long long sbc_extended_t;
#define SBC_FIXED_0(val) { val = 0; }
#define ADD(dst, src) { dst += src; }
#define SUB(dst, src) { dst -= src; }
-#define MUL(dst, a, b) { dst = (sbc_extended_t) (a) * (b); }
+#define MUL(a, b) ((sbc_extended_t)(a) * (b))
#define DIV2(dst, src) { dst = ASR(src, 1); }
-#define MULA(dst, a, b) { dst += (sbc_extended_t) (a) * (b); }
+
+#ifdef __arm__
+#define MULA(a, b, res) ({ \
+ long long tmp = res; \
+ __asm__( \
+ "smlal %Q0, %R0, %2, %3" \
+ : "=&r" (tmp) \
+ : "0" (tmp), "r" (a), "r" (b)); \
+ tmp; })
+#else
+#define MULA(a, b, res) ((sbc_extended_t)(a) * (b) + (res))
+#endif
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Hey
The only thing I'd add here is the ugliness in putting the function
declaration inside the ifdef is mitigated a bit by taking advantage
instead of the ugliness of making the function non-static for all
platforms.
The thing to note here is the optimization will not take if gcc sees
the function is static *or* inline.
It isn't perfect, but replacing the whole function with assembly will
be even harder to maintain. We're really hurting on omap so we need to
take some steps to get performance up.
diff -u -r1.56 sbc.c
--- sbc/sbc.c 29 Jan 2008 18:56:13 -0000 1.56
+++ sbc/sbc.c 29 Jan 2008 19:03:06 -0000
@@ -709,9 +709,13 @@
}
-static inline void _sbc_analyze_four(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
+void _sbc_analyze_four(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
{
+#ifdef __arm__
+ sbc_extended_t register res asm("r4");
+#else
sbc_extended_t res;
+#endif
sbc_fixed_t t[8];
sbc_extended_t s[5];
@@ -794,9 +798,13 @@
state->position[ch] = 36;
}
-static inline void _sbc_analyze_eight(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
+void _sbc_analyze_eight(const int32_t *in, int32_t *out)
{
+#ifdef __arm__
+ sbc_extended_t register res asm("r4");
+#else
sbc_extended_t res;
+#endif
sbc_fixed_t t[8];
sbc_extended_t s[8];
--
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel