Hi Everyone,
I have applied the -mh1 patch set on a 2.6.6 tree and get linker errors
related to duplicate HID function definitions. I included the error
messages as well as my .config.
There is apparently a conflict between hid-core and hidp. Is my config
nonsensical ?
thanks,
fred
p.s. Don't be surprised by the PWCX config options; they're for my
Philips webcam (a separate patch).
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
net/built-in.o(.text+0x99e70): In function `hid_output_report':
: multiple definition of `hid_output_report'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x126fd0): first defined here
net/built-in.o(.text+0x9a0d0): In function `hid_find_field_in_report':
: multiple definition of `hid_find_field_in_report'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x127230): first defined here
net/built-in.o(.text+0x99f90): In function `hid_find_field':
: multiple definition of `hid_find_field'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x1270f0): first defined here
net/built-in.o(.text+0x9b200): In function `hidinput_report_event':
: multiple definition of `hidinput_report_event'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x12ad10): first defined here
net/built-in.o(.text+0x9afa0): In function `hidinput_hid_event':
: multiple definition of `hidinput_hid_event'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x12aa50): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `hidinput_hid_event' changed from 699 in
drivers/built-in.o to 596 in net/built-in.o
net/built-in.o(.text+0x99ec0): In function `hid_set_field':
: multiple definition of `hid_set_field'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x127020): first defined here
net/built-in.o(.text+0x9a1b0): In function `hid_init_reports':
: multiple definition of `hid_init_reports'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x127a90): first defined here
ld: Warning: size of symbol `hid_init_reports' changed from 431 in
drivers/built-in.o to 126 in net/built-in.o
net/built-in.o(.text+0x9a040): In function `hid_find_report_by_usage':
: multiple definition of `hid_find_report_by_usage'
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x1271a0): first defined here
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 13:05, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Frederic,
>
> > I have applied the -mh1 patch set on a 2.6.6 tree and get linker errors
> > related to duplicate HID function definitions. I included the error
> > messages as well as my .config.
> >
> > There is apparently a conflict between hid-core and hidp. Is my config
> > nonsensical ?
>
> we already discussed this here and the problem is that you can't use
> both hidp and usbhid built-in right now.
oops. I searched first but did not see that thread; truly sorry.
> I fixed it in my tree and with
> -mh2 it should be possible again, but this patch isn't out yet. Use
> modules to prevent this error.
ack. thanks for re-explaining!
best regards,
fred
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
Hi Frederic,
> I have applied the -mh1 patch set on a 2.6.6 tree and get linker errors
> related to duplicate HID function definitions. I included the error
> messages as well as my .config.
>
> There is apparently a conflict between hid-core and hidp. Is my config
> nonsensical ?
we already discussed this here and the problem is that you can't use
both hidp and usbhid built-in right now. I fixed it in my tree and with
-mh2 it should be possible again, but this patch isn't out yet. Use
modules to prevent this error.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users