On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:44:49PM +0200, Carlo E. Prelz wrote:
> Hello there. I see you are the person who pushed upwards changes
> related to the Linux crypto susbsystem for 2.6.27. I wanted to let you
> know that, on a Core2 laptop platform, the new code for the Camellia
> module generates different encrypted content. Both implementations
> work, but a file that was encrypted with pre-2.6.27 cannot be
> decrypted with the current code.
>
> Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that
> went with the patch.
No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me.
Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Subject: Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible
Date: dom 07 set 08 12:42:50 +1000
Quoting Herbert Xu ([email protected]):
> No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me.
Thank you all for all the work that goes into maintaining Linux...
> Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now.
I will be glad to verify that all is OK as soon as the change
percolates into a 2.6.27-rc patch.
Carlo
--
* Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte,
* K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected] che bisogno ci sarebbe
* di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu)
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 00:42 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:44:49PM +0200, Carlo E. Prelz wrote:
> > Hello there. I see you are the person who pushed upwards changes
> > related to the Linux crypto susbsystem for 2.6.27. I wanted to let you
> > know that, on a Core2 laptop platform, the new code for the Camellia
> > module generates different encrypted content. Both implementations
> > work, but a file that was encrypted with pre-2.6.27 cannot be
> > decrypted with the current code.
> >
> > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that
> > went with the patch.
>
> No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me.
>
> Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now.
>
Please do, I still haven't managed to to track down why this changes
any behavior, I'll resubmit at a later date if I ever figure it out.
Harvey
Subject: Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible
Date: dom 07 set 08 12:55:42 -0700
Quoting Harvey Harrison ([email protected]):
> > > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that
> > > went with the patch.
> >
> > No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me.
> >
> > Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now.
> >
>
> Please do, I still haven't managed to to track down why this changes
> any behavior, I'll resubmit at a later date if I ever figure it out.
I can confirm that, with 2.6.27-rc6, my camellia-encrypted partition
mounts cleanly once more.
Thanks
Carlo
--
* Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte,
* K * Carlo E. Prelz - [email protected] che bisogno ci sarebbe
* di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu)