Hi Herbert,
This series is a set of 4 fixes on the Inside Secure SafeXcel crypto
engine driver. The series will be followed by another non-fix one.
This is based on v4.15-rc3.
Thanks,
Antoine
Since v2:
- Removed the patch only update the result buffer when provided.
Since v1:
- Removed the crash.txt file which was part of patch 1/4.
Antoine Tenart (2):
crypto: inside-secure - free requests even if their handling failed
crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path
Ofer Heifetz (1):
crypto: inside-secure - per request invalidation
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 1 +
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.14.3
This patch makes use of the SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK and
AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK helpers to allocate enough memory to contain both
the crypto request structures and their embedded context (__ctx).
Fixes: 1b44c5a60c13 ("crypto: inside-secure - add SafeXcel EIP197 crypto engine driver")
Suggested-by: Ofer Heifetz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <[email protected]>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
index 9ea24868d860..ef44f5a5a90f 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
@@ -422,25 +422,25 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
- struct skcipher_request req;
- struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(&req);
+ SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm));
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
- memset(&req, 0, sizeof(struct skcipher_request));
+ memset(req, 0, sizeof(struct skcipher_request));
/* create invalidation request */
init_completion(&result.completion);
- skcipher_request_set_callback(&req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
+ skcipher_request_set_callback(req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
safexcel_inv_complete, &result);
- skcipher_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm));
- ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
+ skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm));
+ ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
sreq->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
- crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
+ crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req->base);
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
if (!priv->ring[ring].need_dequeue)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
index 6135c9f5742c..d2e024732988 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
@@ -451,25 +451,25 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
- struct ahash_request req;
- struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(&req);
+ AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm));
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
- memset(&req, 0, sizeof(struct ahash_request));
+ memset(req, 0, sizeof(struct ahash_request));
/* create invalidation request */
init_completion(&result.completion);
- ahash_request_set_callback(&req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
+ ahash_request_set_callback(req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
safexcel_inv_complete, &result);
- ahash_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm));
- ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
+ ahash_request_set_tfm(req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm));
+ ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
rctx->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
- crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
+ crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req->base);
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
if (!priv->ring[ring].need_dequeue)
--
2.14.3
From: Ofer Heifetz <[email protected]>
When an invalidation request is needed we currently override the context
.send and .handle_result helpers. This is wrong as under high load other
requests can already be queued and overriding the context helpers will
make them execute the wrong .send and .handle_result functions.
This commit fixes this by adding a needs_inv flag in the request to
choose the action to perform when sending requests or handling their
results. This flag will be set when needed (i.e. when the context flag
will be set).
Fixes: 1b44c5a60c13 ("crypto: inside-secure - add SafeXcel EIP197 crypto engine driver")
Signed-off-by: Ofer Heifetz <[email protected]>
[Antoine: commit message, and removed non related changes from the
original commit]
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <[email protected]>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
index 5438552bc6d7..9ea24868d860 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <crypto/aes.h>
#include <crypto/skcipher.h>
+#include <crypto/internal/skcipher.h>
#include "safexcel.h"
@@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ struct safexcel_cipher_ctx {
unsigned int key_len;
};
+struct safexcel_cipher_req {
+ bool needs_inv;
+};
+
static void safexcel_cipher_token(struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx,
struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_command_desc *cdesc,
@@ -126,9 +131,9 @@ static int safexcel_context_control(struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx,
return 0;
}
-static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- struct crypto_async_request *async,
- bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+static int safexcel_handle_req_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
{
struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
struct safexcel_result_desc *rdesc;
@@ -265,7 +270,6 @@ static int safexcel_aes_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock);
request->req = &req->base;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
*commands = n_cdesc;
*results = n_rdesc;
@@ -341,8 +345,6 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ring = ring;
- ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_aes_send;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
enq_ret = crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, async);
@@ -359,6 +361,26 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
return ndesc;
}
+static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+{
+ struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
+ int err;
+
+ if (sreq->needs_inv) {
+ sreq->needs_inv = false;
+ err = safexcel_handle_inv_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ } else {
+ err = safexcel_handle_req_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
int *commands, int *results)
@@ -368,8 +390,6 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_inv_result;
-
ret = safexcel_invalidate_cache(async, &ctx->base, priv,
ctx->base.ctxr_dma, ring, request);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -381,11 +401,29 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
return 0;
}
+static int safexcel_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
+ int *commands, int *results)
+{
+ struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (sreq->needs_inv)
+ ret = safexcel_cipher_send_inv(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ else
+ ret = safexcel_aes_send(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
struct skcipher_request req;
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(&req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
@@ -399,7 +437,7 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
skcipher_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm));
ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_cipher_send_inv;
+ sreq->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
@@ -424,19 +462,21 @@ static int safexcel_aes(struct skcipher_request *req,
enum safexcel_cipher_direction dir, u32 mode)
{
struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret, ring;
+ sreq->needs_inv = false;
ctx->direction = dir;
ctx->mode = mode;
if (ctx->base.ctxr) {
- if (ctx->base.needs_inv)
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_cipher_send_inv;
+ if (ctx->base.needs_inv) {
+ sreq->needs_inv = true;
+ ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
+ }
} else {
ctx->base.ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_aes_send;
-
ctx->base.ctxr = dma_pool_zalloc(priv->context_pool,
EIP197_GFP_FLAGS(req->base),
&ctx->base.ctxr_dma);
@@ -476,6 +516,11 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
alg.skcipher.base);
ctx->priv = tmpl->priv;
+ ctx->base.send = safexcel_send;
+ ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
+
+ crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(__crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm),
+ sizeof(struct safexcel_cipher_req));
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
index 74feb6227101..6135c9f5742c 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct safexcel_ahash_req {
bool last_req;
bool finish;
bool hmac;
+ bool needs_inv;
u8 state_sz; /* expected sate size, only set once */
u32 state[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE / sizeof(u32)];
@@ -119,9 +120,9 @@ static void safexcel_context_control(struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx,
}
}
-static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- struct crypto_async_request *async,
- bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+static int safexcel_handle_req_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
{
struct safexcel_result_desc *rdesc;
struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
@@ -165,9 +166,9 @@ static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
return 1;
}
-static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
- struct safexcel_request *request, int *commands,
- int *results)
+static int safexcel_ahash_send_req(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
+ struct safexcel_request *request, int *commands,
+ int *results)
{
struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
struct crypto_ahash *ahash = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(areq);
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
req->processed += len;
request->req = &areq->base;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
*commands = n_cdesc;
*results = 1;
@@ -374,8 +374,6 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ring = ring;
- ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
enq_ret = crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, async);
@@ -392,6 +390,26 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
return 1;
}
+static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+{
+ struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *req = ahash_request_ctx(areq);
+ int err;
+
+ if (req->needs_inv) {
+ req->needs_inv = false;
+ err = safexcel_handle_inv_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ } else {
+ err = safexcel_handle_req_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
int *commands, int *results)
@@ -400,7 +418,6 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_ahash_ctx(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(areq));
int ret;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_inv_result;
ret = safexcel_invalidate_cache(async, &ctx->base, ctx->priv,
ctx->base.ctxr_dma, ring, request);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -412,11 +429,30 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
return 0;
}
+static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
+ int *commands, int *results)
+{
+
+ struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *req = ahash_request_ctx(areq);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (req->needs_inv)
+ ret = safexcel_ahash_send_inv(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ else
+ ret = safexcel_ahash_send_req(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
struct ahash_request req;
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(&req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
@@ -430,7 +466,7 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
ahash_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm));
ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send_inv;
+ rctx->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
@@ -481,14 +517,16 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_enqueue(struct ahash_request *areq)
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret, ring;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
+ req->needs_inv = false;
if (req->processed && ctx->digest == CONTEXT_CONTROL_DIGEST_PRECOMPUTED)
ctx->base.needs_inv = safexcel_ahash_needs_inv_get(areq);
if (ctx->base.ctxr) {
- if (ctx->base.needs_inv)
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send_inv;
+ if (ctx->base.needs_inv) {
+ ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
+ req->needs_inv = true;
+ }
} else {
ctx->base.ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ctxr = dma_pool_zalloc(priv->context_pool,
@@ -622,6 +660,8 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
struct safexcel_alg_template, alg.ahash);
ctx->priv = tmpl->priv;
+ ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
+ ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
crypto_ahash_set_reqsize(__crypto_ahash_cast(tfm),
sizeof(struct safexcel_ahash_req));
--
2.14.3
This patch frees the request private data even if its handling failed,
as it would never be freed otherwise.
Fixes: 1b44c5a60c13 ("crypto: inside-secure - add SafeXcel EIP197 crypto engine driver")
Suggested-by: Ofer Heifetz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <[email protected]>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
index 89ba9e85c0f3..4bcef78a08aa 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
@@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static inline void safexcel_handle_result_descriptor(struct safexcel_crypto_priv
ndesc = ctx->handle_result(priv, ring, sreq->req,
&should_complete, &ret);
if (ndesc < 0) {
+ kfree(sreq);
dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to handle result (%d)", ndesc);
return;
}
--
2.14.3
Hi,
I'll send a v4 soon as there are two coding style issues in the series.
I'll also include a new patch to only update the areq->result buffer on
final operations (this will fix the issue I was trying to fix with "only
update the result buffer when provided").
Sorry for the noise.
Antoine
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:48:05AM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> This series is a set of 4 fixes on the Inside Secure SafeXcel crypto
> engine driver. The series will be followed by another non-fix one.
>
> This is based on v4.15-rc3.
>
> Thanks,
> Antoine
>
> Since v2:
> - Removed the patch only update the result buffer when provided.
>
> Since v1:
> - Removed the crash.txt file which was part of patch 1/4.
>
> Antoine Tenart (2):
> crypto: inside-secure - free requests even if their handling failed
> crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path
>
> Ofer Heifetz (1):
> crypto: inside-secure - per request invalidation
>
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 1 +
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.14.3
>
--
Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com