Em seg., 22 de fev. de 2021 às 17:26, Stefan Berger
<[email protected]> escreveu:
>
> On 2/22/21 12:58 PM, Saulo Alessandre wrote:
> > From: Saulo Alessandre <[email protected]>
> >
> > * crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > - prepare x509 parser to load nist_secp384r1
> >
> > * crypto/ecc_curve_defs.h
> > - add nist_p384 params
> >
> > * include/crypto/ecdh.h
> > - add ECC_CURVE_NIST_P384
> >
> > * include/linux/oid_registry.h
> > - reorder OID_id_ecdsa_with_sha1
> > - add OID_id_secp384r1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saulo Alessandre <[email protected]>
>
> I would separate this patch into an x509: and certs: part since it
> touches two subsystems.
>
> I can take this series of patches and post my v9 including them at the
> end. This would make it easier for others to test. I would massage them
> a bit, including the separation of the 1st patch into 2 patches, if you
> don't mind, preserving your Signed-off-by. I need to fix something in my
> v8 regarding registration failure handling. Let me know whether this is
> fine with you.
For me it's ok.
>
> I had tested your patches over the weekend with my endless test tool
> creating keys in user space and loading them into the kernel. It worked
> fine for NIST p256 & p384. Also signing kernel modules with NIST p384 is
> working fine.
>
> So, for the series:
>
> Tested-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
>
> Regards,
>
> Stefan
>
>
Regards
--
[]'s
-----
Saulo Alessandre <[email protected]>