On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:40:27PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> +/* Kernel parameters like nohz_full and isolcpus allow passing cpu numbers
> + * for disabling housekeeping types.
> + *
> + * The functions bellow work the opposite way, by referencing which cpus
> + * are able to perform the housekeeping type in parameter.
> + */
So checkpatch should have bitten your head off for this drug-indiced
comment style :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com/
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:03 AM Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:40:27PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
>
> > +/* Kernel parameters like nohz_full and isolcpus allow passing cpu numbers
> > + * for disabling housekeeping types.
> > + *
> > + * The functions bellow work the opposite way, by referencing which cpus
> > + * are able to perform the housekeeping type in parameter.
> > + */
>
> So checkpatch should have bitten your head off for this drug-indiced
> comment style :-)
Oh, my bad on this one, I will fix that now.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com/
>
Any comments in the text? Is that correct?
Thanks for the feedback!
Best regards,
Leo