2023-04-07 06:22:56

by Wolfram Sang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Use CCP driver to handle PSP I2C arbitration


> > How should this go upstream, i.e. are there dependencies? Shall I pick
> > the I2C patches or is it better if all goes via the crypto tree?
> >
> IMO it's better to go through the crypto tree.  There are dependencies
> in the crypto part from the earlier series that was merged.

Ok, fine with me. I acked the I2C patches. Thanks for the heads up.


Attachments:
(No filename) (365.00 B)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-04-12 16:29:13

by Mario Limonciello

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Use CCP driver to handle PSP I2C arbitration

On 4/7/2023 01:18, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>>> How should this go upstream, i.e. are there dependencies? Shall I pick
>>> the I2C patches or is it better if all goes via the crypto tree?
>>>
>> IMO it's better to go through the crypto tree.  There are dependencies
>> in the crypto part from the earlier series that was merged.
>
> Ok, fine with me. I acked the I2C patches. Thanks for the heads up.
>

Herbert,

Would you mind to queue these up for -next? I do have some other
separate work I will be submitting that is going to layer on top of
them, so I'd like to base it off your branch with these landed.