Yes, thank you!
On 2020/2/22 22:24, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> Pointer ctx is being re-assigned with the same value as it
> was initialized with. The second assignment is redundant and
> can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
> index a2cfcc9ccd94..acd15507eb8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ static int sec_skcipher_init(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
> struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
> int ret;
>
> - ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
> ctx->alg_type = SEC_SKCIPHER;
> crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, sizeof(struct sec_req));
> ctx->c_ctx.ivsize = crypto_skcipher_ivsize(tfm);