2009-06-16 13:36:14

by Scott James Remnant

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure.in: add --disable-libuuid option (Was: libuuid (Re: blkid: util-linux-ng vs. e2fsprogs))

Hi Ted, any good?

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:39 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:51 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:48:57AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > It is supposed to be safe to replace the built-in libblkid in
> > > e2fsprogs with the one in util-linux-ng. There may be bugs, but if
> > > there are report them, and we'll work to get them fixed. I'll try to
> > > keep the bug fixes in e2fsprogs and util-linux-ng roughly synchronized
> > > for at least a while, since it takes a while for distributions to make
> > > the switch. So a brusque, "drop libblkid, who cares if we screw over
> > > distro's that haven't yet moved to util-linux-ng" is not in the cards,
> > > no. In terms of formal plan, probably in a year or so. I'm believer
> > > in long compatibility windows.
> >
> > Yes, this is our plan.
> >
> > This reminds me...
> >
> > The next step is to move libuuid from e2fsprogs to util-linux-ng.
> > Currently, this library is widely used by many packages (Fedora-11):
> >
> > $ repoquery --qf="%{NAME}" --whatrequires libuuid* | sort -u | wc -l
> > 74
> >
> > The util-linux-ng code is already prepared for this change and the
> > library has been merged into git tree.
> >
> > It would be nice to add the --disable-uuid option to e2fsprogs. If I
> > good remember Scott has a patch for this change. Scott?
> >
> Right ;)
>
> attached
>
> Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
[email protected]


Attachments:
signature.asc (197.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2009-06-18 00:27:36

by Kay Sievers

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure.in: add --disable-libuuid option (Was: libuuid (Re: blkid: util-linux-ng vs. e2fsprogs))

Hey Ted,
it would be great, if you could add that, and put it into a release.
The current packaging is a dependency hell, and it would be much
easier if util-linux-ng can just provide all the needed stuff for
libblkid, instead of the circular dependencies we have to work around
now.

Thanks,
Kay

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 15:36, Scott James Remnant<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ted, any good?
>
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:39 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:51 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 08:48:57AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> > > It is supposed to be safe to replace the built-in libblkid in
>> > > e2fsprogs with the one in util-linux-ng.  There may be bugs, but if
>> > > there are report them, and we'll work to get them fixed.  I'll try to
>> > > keep the bug fixes in e2fsprogs and util-linux-ng roughly synchronized
>> > > for at least a while, since it takes a while for distributions to make
>> > > the switch.  So a brusque, "drop libblkid, who cares if we screw over
>> > > distro's that haven't yet moved to util-linux-ng" is not in the cards,
>> > > no.  In terms of formal plan, probably in a year or so.  I'm believer
>> > > in long compatibility windows.
>> >
>> >  Yes, this is our plan.
>> >
>> >  This reminds me...
>> >
>> >  The next step is to move libuuid from e2fsprogs to util-linux-ng.
>> >  Currently, this library is widely used by many packages (Fedora-11):
>> >
>> >    $ repoquery --qf="%{NAME}" --whatrequires libuuid* | sort -u | wc -l
>> >    74
>> >
>> >  The util-linux-ng code is already prepared for this change and the
>> >  library has been merged into git tree.
>> >
>> >  It would be nice to add the --disable-uuid option to e2fsprogs. If I
>> >  good remember Scott has a patch for this change. Scott?
>> >
>> Right ;)
>>
>> attached
>>
>> Scott
> --
> Scott James Remnant
> [email protected]
>