On 02/04/2011 02:51 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Last good Kernel was 2.6.37
> I'm doing a "mount" then "unmount". I think root is the only created inode.
> rmmod is called immediately after "unmount" within a script
>
> if I only do unmount and manually call "modprobe --remove exofs" after a small while
> all is fine.
>
> I get:
> slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `exofs_inode_cache': Can't free all objects
> Call Trace:
> 77dfde08: [<6007e9a6>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x82/0xca
> 77dfde38: [<7c1fa3da>] exit_exofs+0x1a/0x1c [exofs]
> 77dfde48: [<60054c10>] sys_delete_module+0x1b9/0x217
> 77dfdee8: [<60014d60>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
> 77dfdf08: [<60024163>] userspace+0x2dd/0x38a
> 77dfdfc8: [<600126af>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
>
I also get a similar error when testing ext4 and a bug is opened there.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
And I have done some simple investigation for ext4 and It looks as if now with the new *fs_i_callback doesn't free the inode to *fs_inode_cache immediately. So the old logic will destroy the inode cache before we free all the inode object.
Since there are more than one fs affected by this, we may need to find a way in the VFS.
Regards,
Tao
> The UML Kernel also crashes after this message, with:
>
> Modules linked in: nfsd exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc cryptomgr aead crc32c crypto_hash crypto_algapi iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi scsi_mod binfmt_misc [last unloaded: libosd]
> Pid: 6, comm: rcu_kthread Not tainted 2.6.38-rc3+
> RIP: 0033:[<000000007c1fa0e7>]
> RSP: 000000007943be18 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 000000007943a000 RBX: 000000007937bb80 RCX: 0000000000000095
> RDX: 000000007937c8b8 RSI: 0000000077fb6c80 RDI: 000000007937bb80
> RBP: 000000007943be40 R08: 000000007943be10 R09: 000000007943a000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000795123e0
> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000000000000000a
> Call Trace:
> 602678f8: [<600144ed>] segv+0x70/0x212
> 60267928: [<6001cd9e>] ubd_intr+0x72/0xdf
> 60267988: [<601b778e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x1c
> 602679d8: [<600146ee>] segv_handler+0x5f/0x65
> 60267a08: [<60021488>] sig_handler_common+0x84/0x98
> 60267ab0: [<60130926>] strncpy+0xf/0x27
> 60267b38: [<600215ce>] sig_handler+0x30/0x3b
> 60267b58: [<60021800>] handle_signal+0x6d/0xa3
> 60267ba8: [<60023180>] hard_handler+0x10/0x14
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Segfault with no mm
> Call Trace:
> 602677f8: [<601b52b1>] panic+0xea/0x1e6
> 60267818: [<6007e299>] kmem_cache_free+0x54/0x5f
> 60267850: [<6005342e>] __module_text_address+0xd/0x53
> 60267868: [<6005347d>] is_module_text_address+0x9/0x11
> 60267878: [<6004290c>] __kernel_text_address+0x65/0x6b
> 60267880: [<60023180>] hard_handler+0x10/0x14
> 60267898: [<6001345e>] show_trace+0x8e/0x95
> 602678c8: [<60026c40>] show_regs+0x2b/0x2f
> 602678f8: [<60014577>] segv+0xfa/0x212
> 60267928: [<6001cd9e>] ubd_intr+0x72/0xdf
> 60267988: [<601b778e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x1c
> 602679d8: [<600146ee>] segv_handler+0x5f/0x65
> 60267a08: [<60021488>] sig_handler_common+0x84/0x98
> 60267ab0: [<60130926>] strncpy+0xf/0x27
> 60267b38: [<600215ce>] sig_handler+0x30/0x3b
> 60267b58: [<60021800>] handle_signal+0x6d/0xa3
> 60267ba8: [<60023180>] hard_handler+0x10/0x14
>
>
> Modules linked in: nfsd exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc cryptomgr aead crc32c crypto_hash crypto_algapi iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi scsi_mod binfmt_misc [last unloaded: libosd]
> Pid: 6, comm: rcu_kthread Not tainted 2.6.38-rc3+
> RIP: 0033:[<0000003ea3832ad7>]
> RSP: 00007fff63338e38 EFLAGS: 00000202
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000219 RCX: ffffffffffffffff
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000013 RDI: 0000000000000219
> RBP: 00007fff63338e70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff63338e70
> R10: 00007fff63338be0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000215
> R13: 00007fe54ee756a8 R14: 00007fff63339090 R15: 00007fff63339928
> Call Trace:
> 60267788: [<6001485b>] panic_exit+0x2f/0x45
> 602677a8: [<60048ad6>] notifier_call_chain+0x32/0x5e
> 602677e8: [<60048b24>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x13/0x15
> 602677f8: [<601b52cc>] panic+0x105/0x1e6
> 60267818: [<6007e299>] kmem_cache_free+0x54/0x5f
> 60267850: [<6005342e>] __module_text_address+0xd/0x53
> 60267868: [<6005347d>] is_module_text_address+0x9/0x11
> 60267878: [<6004290c>] __kernel_text_address+0x65/0x6b
> 60267880: [<60023180>] hard_handler+0x10/0x14
> 60267898: [<6001345e>] show_trace+0x8e/0x95
> 602678c8: [<60026c40>] show_regs+0x2b/0x2f
> 602678f8: [<60014577>] segv+0xfa/0x212
> 60267928: [<6001cd9e>] ubd_intr+0x72/0xdf
> 60267988: [<601b778e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x1c
> 602679d8: [<600146ee>] segv_handler+0x5f/0x65
> 60267a08: [<60021488>] sig_handler_common+0x84/0x98
> 60267ab0: [<60130926>] strncpy+0xf/0x27
> 60267b38: [<600215ce>] sig_handler+0x30/0x3b
> 60267b58: [<60021800>] handle_signal+0x6d/0xa3
> 60267ba8: [<60023180>] hard_handler+0x10/0x14
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Excerpts from Tao Ma's message of 2011-02-04 03:36:59 -0500:
> On 02/04/2011 02:51 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Last good Kernel was 2.6.37
> > I'm doing a "mount" then "unmount". I think root is the only created inode.
> > rmmod is called immediately after "unmount" within a script
> >
> > if I only do unmount and manually call "modprobe --remove exofs" after a small while
> > all is fine.
> >
> > I get:
> > slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `exofs_inode_cache': Can't free all objects
> > Call Trace:
> > 77dfde08: [<6007e9a6>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x82/0xca
> > 77dfde38: [<7c1fa3da>] exit_exofs+0x1a/0x1c [exofs]
> > 77dfde48: [<60054c10>] sys_delete_module+0x1b9/0x217
> > 77dfdee8: [<60014d60>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
> > 77dfdf08: [<60024163>] userspace+0x2dd/0x38a
> > 77dfdfc8: [<600126af>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
> >
> I also get a similar error when testing ext4 and a bug is opened there.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
>
> And I have done some simple investigation for ext4 and It looks as if now with the new *fs_i_callback doesn't free the inode to *fs_inode_cache immediately. So the old logic will destroy the inode cache before we free all the inode object.
>
> Since there are more than one fs affected by this, we may need to find a way in the VFS.
Sounds like we just need a synchronize_rcu call before we delete the
cache?
-chris
On 02/04/2011 09:15 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Tao Ma's message of 2011-02-04 03:36:59 -0500:
>> On 02/04/2011 02:51 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> Last good Kernel was 2.6.37
>>> I'm doing a "mount" then "unmount". I think root is the only created inode.
>>> rmmod is called immediately after "unmount" within a script
>>>
>>> if I only do unmount and manually call "modprobe --remove exofs" after a small while
>>> all is fine.
>>>
>>> I get:
>>> slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `exofs_inode_cache': Can't free all objects
>>> Call Trace:
>>> 77dfde08: [<6007e9a6>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x82/0xca
>>> 77dfde38: [<7c1fa3da>] exit_exofs+0x1a/0x1c [exofs]
>>> 77dfde48: [<60054c10>] sys_delete_module+0x1b9/0x217
>>> 77dfdee8: [<60014d60>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
>>> 77dfdf08: [<60024163>] userspace+0x2dd/0x38a
>>> 77dfdfc8: [<600126af>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
>>>
>> I also get a similar error when testing ext4 and a bug is opened there.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
>>
>> And I have done some simple investigation for ext4 and It looks as if now with the new *fs_i_callback doesn't free the inode to *fs_inode_cache immediately. So the old logic will destroy the inode cache before we free all the inode object.
>>
>> Since there are more than one fs affected by this, we may need to find a way in the VFS.
>
> Sounds like we just need a synchronize_rcu call before we delete the
> cache?
>
> -chris
Hi Al, Nick.
Al please look into this issue. Absolutely all filesystems should be affected.
Tao Ma has attempted the below fix, but it does not help. Exact same trace
with his patch applied.
If you unmount and immediately rmmod the filesystem it will crash because of
those RCU freed objects at umount, like the root inode. Nick is not responding,
I'd try to fix it, but I don't know how.
---
> From: Tao Ma <[email protected]>
>
> In fa0d7e3, we use rcu free inode instead of freeing the inode
> directly. It causes a problem when we rmmod immediately after
> we umount the volume[1].
>
> So we need to call synchronize_rcu after we kill_sb so that
> the inode is freed before we do rmmod. The idea is inspired
> by Chris Mason[2]. I tested with ext4 by umount+rmmod and it
> doesn't show any error by now.
>
> 1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=129680863330185&w=2
> 2. http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=129684698713709&w=2
>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chris Mason <[email protected]>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/super.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 74e149e..315bce9 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
> struct file_system_type *fs = s->s_type;
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&s->s_active)) {
> fs->kill_sb(s);
> + /*
> + * We need to synchronize rcu here so that
> + * the delayed rcu inode free can be executed
> + * before we put_super.
> + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
> + */
> + synchronize_rcu();
> put_filesystem(fs);
> put_super(s);
> } else {
> -- 1.6.3.GIT
Thanks
Boaz
Hi Boaz,
On 02/08/2011 10:45 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 09:15 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Tao Ma's message of 2011-02-04 03:36:59 -0500:
>>
>>> On 02/04/2011 02:51 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Last good Kernel was 2.6.37
>>>> I'm doing a "mount" then "unmount". I think root is the only created inode.
>>>> rmmod is called immediately after "unmount" within a script
>>>>
>>>> if I only do unmount and manually call "modprobe --remove exofs" after a small while
>>>> all is fine.
>>>>
>>>> I get:
>>>> slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `exofs_inode_cache': Can't free all objects
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> 77dfde08: [<6007e9a6>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x82/0xca
>>>> 77dfde38: [<7c1fa3da>] exit_exofs+0x1a/0x1c [exofs]
>>>> 77dfde48: [<60054c10>] sys_delete_module+0x1b9/0x217
>>>> 77dfdee8: [<60014d60>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
>>>> 77dfdf08: [<60024163>] userspace+0x2dd/0x38a
>>>> 77dfdfc8: [<600126af>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I also get a similar error when testing ext4 and a bug is opened there.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
>>>
>>> And I have done some simple investigation for ext4 and It looks as if now with the new *fs_i_callback doesn't free the inode to *fs_inode_cache immediately. So the old logic will destroy the inode cache before we free all the inode object.
>>>
>>> Since there are more than one fs affected by this, we may need to find a way in the VFS.
>>>
>> Sounds like we just need a synchronize_rcu call before we delete the
>> cache?
>>
>> -chris
>>
> Hi Al, Nick.
>
> Al please look into this issue. Absolutely all filesystems should be affected.
> Tao Ma has attempted the below fix, but it does not help. Exact same trace
> with his patch applied.
>
I am in vacation so I could't reach my test box today. I have done some
simple tracing yesterday, and it looked that although synchronize_rcu is
called, I can still get ext4_i_callback after it.
So the reason may be:
1. synchronize_rcu doesn't work as we expected.
2. the inode free rcu doesn't work as Nick expected.
I will go to the office tomorrow and do more test and debug there. Hope
to find something more.
> If you unmount and immediately rmmod the filesystem it will crash because of
> those RCU freed objects at umount, like the root inode. Nick is not responding,
> I'd try to fix it, but I don't know how.
>
I raised the error to Nick on Jan. 19, about 3 weeks ago.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=129542001031750&w=2
But it seems that he is quite busy these days. It is still rc3 and we
have a lot of time before the final release. So no panic here. ;)
Finally, I just tried to fix it recently. But it doesn't work. :( I will
continue to work on it before Al or Nick respond with a perfect patch. :)
Regards,
Tao