get_transaction() does nothing but initialization. So, rename it and
also fix the comments.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <[email protected]>
---
fs/jbd/transaction.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
index febc10d..82f8a7a 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
static void __journal_temp_unlink_buffer(struct journal_head *jh);
/*
- * get_transaction: obtain a new transaction_t object.
+ * init_transaction: Initialise a new transaction_t object.
*
- * Simply allocate and initialise a new transaction. Create it in
- * RUNNING state and add it to the current journal (which should not
- * have an existing running transaction: we only make a new transaction
- * once we have started to commit the old one).
+ * Simply initialise a new transaction. initialise it in RUNNING state
+ * and add it to the current journal (which should not have an existing
+ * running transaction: we only make a new transaction once we have
+ * started to commit the old one).
*
* Preconditions:
* The journal MUST be locked. We don't perform atomic mallocs on the
@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ static void __journal_temp_unlink_buffer(struct journal_head *jh);
* Called under j_state_lock
*/
-static transaction_t *
-get_transaction(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transaction)
+static void init_transaction(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transaction)
{
transaction->t_journal = journal;
transaction->t_state = T_RUNNING;
@@ -63,8 +62,6 @@ get_transaction(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transaction)
J_ASSERT(journal->j_running_transaction == NULL);
journal->j_running_transaction = transaction;