On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:30:26PM +0800, Xiong Zhou wrote:
> Once upon a time, ext4 encounter NULL pointer dereference under this
> situaiton due to jump to a wrong label. Part of this commit fixed
> this Oops:
>
> 744692d ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
>
> We can also run this test on ext2/3. Note that fsck will fail on
> ext2 due to:
> "Superblock needs_recovery flag is set, but no journal is present"
I don't think fsck is needed in this test, superblock is modified on
purpose and ext2 always fails the check. So changing _require_scratch to
_require_scratch_nocheck would be good.
Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks,
Eryu
Once upon a time, ext4 encounter NULL pointer dereference under this
situaiton due to jump to a wrong label. Part of this commit fixed
this Oops:
744692d ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
We can also run this test on ext2/3.
This case is based on a script from Monakhov Dmitriy @ openvz.
Cc: Monakhov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <[email protected]>
---
v2: skip fsck on scratch.
tests/shared/003 | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/shared/003.out | 2 ++
tests/shared/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/shared/003
create mode 100644 tests/shared/003.out
diff --git a/tests/shared/003 b/tests/shared/003
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..8e02e82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/shared/003
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# FS QA Test 003
+#
+# Test mount a needs_recovery partition with noload option.
+# ext4 used to Oops until part of this commit:
+#
+# 744692d ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
+#
+# Also test on ext2/3.
+#
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Copyright (c) 2015 Red Hat Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+# published by the Free Software Foundation.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
+# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ cd /
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs ext2 ext3 ext4
+_supported_os Linux
+
+# nofsck as we modify sb via debugfs
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+
+# remove previous $seqres.full before test
+rm -f $seqres.full
+echo "Silence is golden"
+
+_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+
+# set needs_recovery feature bit
+debugfs -w -R "feature +needs_recovery" $SCRATCH_DEV \
+ >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+
+# mount with noload option
+_scratch_mount "-o noload" >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/shared/003.out b/tests/shared/003.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6895fc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/shared/003.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 003
+Silence is golden
diff --git a/tests/shared/group b/tests/shared/group
index 00d42c8..ba8a3f0 100644
--- a/tests/shared/group
+++ b/tests/shared/group
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#
001 auto quick
002 auto metadata quick
+003 auto quick
006 auto enospc
032 mkfs auto quick
051 acl udf auto quick
--
2.5.0
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 10:20:49AM +0800, Xiong Zhou wrote:
> Once upon a time, ext4 encounter NULL pointer dereference under this
> situaiton due to jump to a wrong label. Part of this commit fixed
> this Oops:
>
> 744692d ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
>
> We can also run this test on ext2/3.
>
> This case is based on a script from Monakhov Dmitriy @ openvz.
>
> Cc: Monakhov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <[email protected]>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <[email protected]>