Hi Ted,
It looks like the right place to check for ino=0 in
ext2fs_read_inode_full() is before creating the inode cache, otherwise
since we set icache[i].ino = 0 in create_icache(), it will match the
loop below and thus we return a wrong value. Below patch fixes it.
==========================================================================
Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <[email protected]>
---
lib/ext2fs/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
index 8908423..a08cb40 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
@@ -536,6 +536,8 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_read_inode_full(ext2_filsys fs,
ext2_ino_t ino,
if (retval != EXT2_ET_CALLBACK_NOTHANDLED)
return retval;
}
+ if ((ino == 0) || (ino > fs->super->s_inodes_count))
+ return EXT2_ET_BAD_INODE_NUM;
/* Create inode cache if not present */
if (!fs->icache) {
retval = create_icache(fs);
@@ -552,8 +554,6 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_read_inode_full(ext2_filsys fs,
ext2_ino_t ino,
}
}
}
- if ((ino == 0) || (ino > fs->super->s_inodes_count))
- return EXT2_ET_BAD_INODE_NUM;
if (fs->flags & EXT2_FLAG_IMAGE_FILE) {
inodes_per_block = fs->blocksize / EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super);
block_nr = fs->image_header->offset_inode / fs->blocksize;
--
1.5.4.3
=====================================================================
Thanks -
Manish
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Manish Katiyar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> It looks like the right place to check for ino=0 in
> ext2fs_read_inode_full() is before creating the inode cache, otherwise
> since we set icache[i].ino = 0 in create_icache(), it will match the
> loop below and thus we return a wrong value. Below patch fixes it.
>
> ==========================================================================
>
> Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
> index 8908423..a08cb40 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
> @@ -536,6 +536,8 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_read_inode_full(ext2_filsys fs,
> ext2_ino_t ino,
> if (retval != EXT2_ET_CALLBACK_NOTHANDLED)
> return retval;
> }
> + if ((ino == 0) || (ino > fs->super->s_inodes_count))
> + return EXT2_ET_BAD_INODE_NUM;
> /* Create inode cache if not present */
> if (!fs->icache) {
> retval = create_icache(fs);
> @@ -552,8 +554,6 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_read_inode_full(ext2_filsys fs,
> ext2_ino_t ino,
> }
> }
> }
> - if ((ino == 0) || (ino > fs->super->s_inodes_count))
> - return EXT2_ET_BAD_INODE_NUM;
> if (fs->flags & EXT2_FLAG_IMAGE_FILE) {
> inodes_per_block = fs->blocksize / EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super);
> block_nr = fs->image_header->offset_inode / fs->blocksize;
> --
> 1.5.4.3
>
>
> =====================================================================
>
Any ack/nack on this ?
> Thanks -
> Manish
>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:40:22AM +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> Any ack/nack on this ?
Applied, sorry for forgetting to ack it.
- Ted