2016-09-27 20:47:55

by Ross Zwisler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] ext2: remove support for DAX PMD faults

DAX PMD support was added via the following commit:

commit e7b1ea2ad658 ("ext2: huge page fault support")

I believe this path to be untested as ext2 doesn't reliably provide block
allocations that are aligned to 2MiB. In my testing I've been unable to
get ext2 to actually fault in a PMD. It always fails with a "pfn
unaligned" message because the sector returned by ext2_get_block() isn't
aligned.

I've tried various settings for the "stride" and "stripe_width" extended
options to mkfs.ext2, without any luck.

Since we can't reliably get PMDs, remove support so that we don't have an
untested code path that we may someday traverse when we happen to get an
aligned block allocation. This should also make 4k DAX faults in ext2 a
bit faster since they will no longer have to call the PMD fault handler
only to get a response of VM_FAULT_FALLBACK.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]>
---
fs/ext2/file.c | 24 +-----------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/file.c b/fs/ext2/file.c
index 0ca363d..d5af6d2 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/file.c
@@ -107,27 +107,6 @@ static int ext2_dax_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
return ret;
}

-static int ext2_dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
- pmd_t *pmd, unsigned int flags)
-{
- struct inode *inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
- struct ext2_inode_info *ei = EXT2_I(inode);
- int ret;
-
- if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
- sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
- file_update_time(vma->vm_file);
- }
- down_read(&ei->dax_sem);
-
- ret = dax_pmd_fault(vma, addr, pmd, flags, ext2_get_block);
-
- up_read(&ei->dax_sem);
- if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
- sb_end_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
- return ret;
-}
-
static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
@@ -154,7 +133,6 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,

static const struct vm_operations_struct ext2_dax_vm_ops = {
.fault = ext2_dax_fault,
- .pmd_fault = ext2_dax_pmd_fault,
.page_mkwrite = ext2_dax_fault,
.pfn_mkwrite = ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite,
};
@@ -166,7 +144,7 @@ static int ext2_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)

file_accessed(file);
vma->vm_ops = &ext2_dax_vm_ops;
- vma->vm_flags |= VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_HUGEPAGE;
+ vma->vm_flags |= VM_MIXEDMAP;
return 0;
}
#else
--
2.7.4


2016-09-27 21:47:20

by Dave Chinner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] ext2: remove support for DAX PMD faults

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> DAX PMD support was added via the following commit:
>
> commit e7b1ea2ad658 ("ext2: huge page fault support")
>
> I believe this path to be untested as ext2 doesn't reliably provide block
> allocations that are aligned to 2MiB. In my testing I've been unable to
> get ext2 to actually fault in a PMD. It always fails with a "pfn
> unaligned" message because the sector returned by ext2_get_block() isn't
> aligned.
>
> I've tried various settings for the "stride" and "stripe_width" extended
> options to mkfs.ext2, without any luck.
>
> Since we can't reliably get PMDs, remove support so that we don't have an
> untested code path that we may someday traverse when we happen to get an
> aligned block allocation. This should also make 4k DAX faults in ext2 a
> bit faster since they will no longer have to call the PMD fault handler
> only to get a response of VM_FAULT_FALLBACK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]>
....
> @@ -154,7 +133,6 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> static const struct vm_operations_struct ext2_dax_vm_ops = {
> .fault = ext2_dax_fault,
> - .pmd_fault = ext2_dax_pmd_fault,
> .page_mkwrite = ext2_dax_fault,
> .pfn_mkwrite = ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite,
> };

Would it be better to put a comment mentioning this here? So as the
years go by, this reminds people not to bother trying to implement
it?

/*
* .pmd_fault is not supported for DAX because allocation in ext2
* cannot be reliably aligned to huge page sizes and so pmd faults
* will always fail and fail back to regular faults.
*/

--
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

2016-09-28 18:46:43

by Ross Zwisler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] ext2: remove support for DAX PMD faults

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 07:47:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > DAX PMD support was added via the following commit:
> >
> > commit e7b1ea2ad658 ("ext2: huge page fault support")
> >
> > I believe this path to be untested as ext2 doesn't reliably provide block
> > allocations that are aligned to 2MiB. In my testing I've been unable to
> > get ext2 to actually fault in a PMD. It always fails with a "pfn
> > unaligned" message because the sector returned by ext2_get_block() isn't
> > aligned.
> >
> > I've tried various settings for the "stride" and "stripe_width" extended
> > options to mkfs.ext2, without any luck.
> >
> > Since we can't reliably get PMDs, remove support so that we don't have an
> > untested code path that we may someday traverse when we happen to get an
> > aligned block allocation. This should also make 4k DAX faults in ext2 a
> > bit faster since they will no longer have to call the PMD fault handler
> > only to get a response of VM_FAULT_FALLBACK.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]>
> ....
> > @@ -154,7 +133,6 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >
> > static const struct vm_operations_struct ext2_dax_vm_ops = {
> > .fault = ext2_dax_fault,
> > - .pmd_fault = ext2_dax_pmd_fault,
> > .page_mkwrite = ext2_dax_fault,
> > .pfn_mkwrite = ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite,
> > };
>
> Would it be better to put a comment mentioning this here? So as the
> years go by, this reminds people not to bother trying to implement
> it?
>
> /*
> * .pmd_fault is not supported for DAX because allocation in ext2
> * cannot be reliably aligned to huge page sizes and so pmd faults
> * will always fail and fail back to regular faults.
> */

Sure, this seems like a good idea. I'll add it, thanks.