2018-02-09 00:38:19

by Dave Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns

The function return values are confusing with the way the function is
named. We expect a true or false return value but it actually returns
0/-errno. This makes the code very confusing. Changing the return values
to return a bool where if DAX is supported then return true and no DAX
support returns false.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dax/super.c | 18 +++++++++---------
fs/ext2/super.c | 5 +++--
fs/ext4/super.c | 5 +++--
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/dax.h | 12 ++++++------
6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
index c4db84f26c0f..ef008e384042 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/super.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_dax_get_by_bdev);
* This is a library function for filesystems to check if the block device
* can be mounted with dax option.
*
- * Return: negative errno if unsupported, 0 if supported.
+ * Return: true if supported, false if unsupported
*/
-int bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
+bool bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
int blocksize)
{
struct dax_device *dax_dev;
@@ -95,21 +95,21 @@ int bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
if (blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) {
pr_debug("VFS (%s): error: unsupported blocksize for dax\n",
sb->s_id);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return false;
}

err = bdev_dax_pgoff(bdev, 0, PAGE_SIZE, &pgoff);
if (err) {
- pr_debug("VFS (%s): error: unaligned partition for dax\n",
- sb->s_id);
- return err;
+ pr_debug("VFS (%s): error: unaligned partition for dax: %d\n",
+ sb->s_id, err);
+ return false;
}

dax_dev = dax_get_by_host(bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
if (!dax_dev) {
pr_debug("VFS (%s): error: device does not support dax\n",
sb->s_id);
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ return false;
}

id = dax_read_lock();
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ int bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
if (len < 1) {
pr_debug("VFS (%s): error: dax access failed (%ld)\n",
sb->s_id, len);
- return len < 0 ? len : -EIO;
+ return false;
}

- return 0;
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_dax_supported);
#endif
diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
index 655699321c45..636b9c5e1bff 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
@@ -958,9 +958,10 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size);

if (sbi->s_mount_opt & EXT2_MOUNT_DAX) {
- err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
- if (err)
+ if(!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
+ err = -EIO;
goto failed_mount;
+ }
}

/* If the blocksize doesn't match, re-read the thing.. */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 804a2d6729af..7b7650ac9c53 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3712,9 +3712,10 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
" that may contain inline data");
goto failed_mount;
}
- err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
- if (err)
+ if (!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
+ err = -EIO;
goto failed_mount;
+ }
}

if (ext4_has_feature_encrypt(sb) && es->s_encryption_level) {
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index f9d3f4314f7c..e440d789ed1b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -1102,8 +1102,8 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_dax_invalidate(
if (fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) {
if (!(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (bdev_dax_supported(sb, xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(VFS_I(ip)),
- sb->s_blocksize) < 0)
+ if (!bdev_dax_supported(sb, xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(VFS_I(ip)),
+ sb->s_blocksize))
return -EINVAL;
}

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 5fd60c1fa9db..39b2295bf646 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1649,18 +1649,18 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
sb->s_flags |= SB_I_VERSION;

if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_DAX) {
- int error2 = 0;
+ bool rtdev_is_dax, datadev_is_dax;

xfs_warn(mp,
"DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk");

- error = bdev_dax_supported(sb, mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev,
- sb->s_blocksize);
+ datadev_is_dax = bdev_dax_supported(sb,
+ mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev, sb->s_blocksize);
if (mp->m_rtdev_targp)
- error2 = bdev_dax_supported(sb,
+ rtdev_is_dax = bdev_dax_supported(sb,
mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev,
sb->s_blocksize);
- if (error && error2) {
+ if (!rtdev_is_dax && !datadev_is_dax) {
xfs_alert(mp,
"DAX unsupported by block device. Turning off DAX.");
mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_DAX;
diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index 1107a980f5c3..ee962705fffb 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ static inline void put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)

int bdev_dax_pgoff(struct block_device *, sector_t, size_t, pgoff_t *pgoff);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX)
-int bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
+bool bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, struct block_device *bdev,
int blocksize);
-static inline int sb_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize)
+static inline bool sb_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize)
{
return bdev_dax_supported(sb, sb->s_bdev, blocksize);
}
@@ -59,16 +59,16 @@ static inline void fs_put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)

struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev);
#else
-static inline int bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb,
+static inline bool bdev_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb,
struct block_device *bdev,
int blocksize)
{
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ return false;
}

-static inline int sb_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize)
+static inline bool sb_dax_supported(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize)
{
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ return false;
}

static inline struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_host(const char *host)


2018-02-13 20:31:48

by Ross Zwisler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:38:19PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> The function return values are confusing with the way the function is
> named. We expect a true or false return value but it actually returns
> 0/-errno. This makes the code very confusing. Changing the return values
> to return a bool where if DAX is supported then return true and no DAX
> support returns false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---

> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index 655699321c45..636b9c5e1bff 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -958,9 +958,10 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size);
>
> if (sbi->s_mount_opt & EXT2_MOUNT_DAX) {
> - err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
> - if (err)
> + if(!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
> + err = -EIO;

No need to set 'err' here. This is just a temporary variable used for some
local checks later in the function. 'ret' is the value that will be returned,
and that is already initialized to -EINVAL which should be fine.

> goto failed_mount;
> + }
> }
>
> /* If the blocksize doesn't match, re-read the thing.. */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 804a2d6729af..7b7650ac9c53 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3712,9 +3712,10 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> " that may contain inline data");
> goto failed_mount;
> }
> - err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
> - if (err)
> + if (!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
> + err = -EIO;

Same comment as with the ext2 case - no need to set 'err', 'ret' is -EINVAL
and has you covered.

2018-02-13 20:35:20

by Dave Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns



On 02/13/2018 01:31 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:38:19PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> The function return values are confusing with the way the function is
>> named. We expect a true or false return value but it actually returns
>> 0/-errno. This makes the code very confusing. Changing the return values
>> to return a bool where if DAX is supported then return true and no DAX
>> support returns false.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
>> index 655699321c45..636b9c5e1bff 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
>> @@ -958,9 +958,10 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>> blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size);
>>
>> if (sbi->s_mount_opt & EXT2_MOUNT_DAX) {
>> - err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
>> - if (err)
>> + if(!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
>> + err = -EIO;
>
> No need to set 'err' here. This is just a temporary variable used for some
> local checks later in the function. 'ret' is the value that will be returned,
> and that is already initialized to -EINVAL which should be fine.

Change ret to -EIO instead to set the correct error return code?

>
>> goto failed_mount;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* If the blocksize doesn't match, re-read the thing.. */
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> index 804a2d6729af..7b7650ac9c53 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> @@ -3712,9 +3712,10 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>> " that may contain inline data");
>> goto failed_mount;
>> }
>> - err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
>> + err = -EIO;
>
> Same comment as with the ext2 case - no need to set 'err', 'ret' is -EINVAL
> and has you covered.
>

2018-02-13 20:43:51

by Ross Zwisler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: change bdev_dax_supported() to support boolean returns

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:35:19PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 02/13/2018 01:31 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:38:19PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >> The function return values are confusing with the way the function is
> >> named. We expect a true or false return value but it actually returns
> >> 0/-errno. This makes the code very confusing. Changing the return values
> >> to return a bool where if DAX is supported then return true and no DAX
> >> support returns false.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >
> >> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> >> index 655699321c45..636b9c5e1bff 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> >> @@ -958,9 +958,10 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> >> blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size);
> >>
> >> if (sbi->s_mount_opt & EXT2_MOUNT_DAX) {
> >> - err = sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize);
> >> - if (err)
> >> + if(!sb_dax_supported(sb, blocksize)) {
> >> + err = -EIO;
> >
> > No need to set 'err' here. This is just a temporary variable used for some
> > local checks later in the function. 'ret' is the value that will be returned,
> > and that is already initialized to -EINVAL which should be fine.
>
> Change ret to -EIO instead to set the correct error return code?

I'm not sure that -EIO is the 'correct' return code. The old
sb_dax_supported() code could have returned -EINVAL, -EOPNOTSUPP or -EIO,
based on what went wrong. All the other error cases in this function just
goto failed_mount without messing with 'ret', and we should probably do the
same.