On Thu 20-08-20 17:06:28, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Currently in case of DAX, we are starting a transaction
> everytime for IOMAP_WRITE case. This can be optimized
> away in case of an overwrite (where the blocks were already
> allocated). This could give a significant performance boost
> for multi-threaded random writes.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]>
Thanks for returning to this and I'm glad to see how much this helped :)
BTW, I'd suspect there could be also significant contention and cache line
bouncing on j_state_lock and transaction's atomic counters...
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
> fs/ext4/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 42f5060f3cdf..9a2138afc751 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -3232,6 +3232,7 @@ extern const struct dentry_operations ext4_dentry_ops;
> extern const struct inode_operations ext4_file_inode_operations;
> extern const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations;
> extern loff_t ext4_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin);
> +extern bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len);
>
> /* inline.c */
> extern int ext4_get_max_inline_size(struct inode *inode);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 2a01e31a032c..51cd92ac1758 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ ext4_extending_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, size_t len)
> }
>
> /* Is IO overwriting allocated and initialized blocks? */
> -static bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len)
> +bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len)
> {
> struct ext4_map_blocks map;
> unsigned int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 10dd470876b3..f0ac0ee9e991 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3423,6 +3423,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> int ret;
> struct ext4_map_blocks map;
> u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
> + bool overwrite = false;
>
> if ((offset >> blkbits) > EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3430,6 +3431,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ext4_has_inline_data(inode)))
> return -ERANGE;
>
> + if (IS_DAX(inode) && (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) &&
> + ext4_overwrite_io(inode, offset, length))
> + overwrite = true;
So the patch looks correct but using ext4_overwrite_io() seems a bit
foolish since under the hood it does ext4_map_blocks() only to be able to
decide whether to call ext4_map_blocks() once again with exactly the same
arguments :). So I'd rather slightly refactor the code in
ext4_iomap_begin() to avoid this double calling of ext4_map_blocks() for
the fast path.
Honza
> /*
> * Calculate the first and last logical blocks respectively.
> */
> @@ -3437,13 +3441,15 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> map.m_len = min_t(loff_t, (offset + length - 1) >> blkbits,
> EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK) - map.m_lblk + 1;
>
> - if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE)
> + if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && !overwrite)
> ret = ext4_iomap_alloc(inode, &map, flags);
> else
> ret = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> + if (IS_DAX(inode) && overwrite)
> + WARN_ON(!(map.m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED));
>
> ext4_set_iomap(inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);
>
> --
> 2.25.4
>
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
On 8/20/20 6:23 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 20-08-20 17:06:28, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Currently in case of DAX, we are starting a transaction
>> everytime for IOMAP_WRITE case. This can be optimized
>> away in case of an overwrite (where the blocks were already
>> allocated). This could give a significant performance boost
>> for multi-threaded random writes.
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks for returning to this and I'm glad to see how much this helped :)
> BTW, I'd suspect there could be also significant contention and cache line
> bouncing on j_state_lock and transaction's atomic counters...
ok, will try and profile to see if this happens.
>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
>> fs/ext4/file.c | 2 +-
>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> index 42f5060f3cdf..9a2138afc751 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -3232,6 +3232,7 @@ extern const struct dentry_operations ext4_dentry_ops;
>> extern const struct inode_operations ext4_file_inode_operations;
>> extern const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations;
>> extern loff_t ext4_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin);
>> +extern bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len);
>>
>> /* inline.c */
>> extern int ext4_get_max_inline_size(struct inode *inode);
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
>> index 2a01e31a032c..51cd92ac1758 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
>> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ ext4_extending_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, size_t len)
>> }
>>
>> /* Is IO overwriting allocated and initialized blocks? */
>> -static bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len)
>> +bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len)
>> {
>> struct ext4_map_blocks map;
>> unsigned int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index 10dd470876b3..f0ac0ee9e991 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -3423,6 +3423,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
>> int ret;
>> struct ext4_map_blocks map;
>> u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
>> + bool overwrite = false;
>>
>> if ((offset >> blkbits) > EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -3430,6 +3431,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ext4_has_inline_data(inode)))
>> return -ERANGE;
>>
>> + if (IS_DAX(inode) && (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) &&
>> + ext4_overwrite_io(inode, offset, length))
>> + overwrite = true;
>
> So the patch looks correct but using ext4_overwrite_io() seems a bit
> foolish since under the hood it does ext4_map_blocks() only to be able to
> decide whether to call ext4_map_blocks() once again with exactly the same
> arguments :). So I'd rather slightly refactor the code in
> ext4_iomap_begin() to avoid this double calling of ext4_map_blocks() for
> the fast path.
Yes, agreed. Looking at the numbers I was excited to post out the RFC
for discussion. Will make above changes and post. :)
With DIO, we need to detect overwrite case early in
ext4_dio_write_iter() to determine whether we need shared or excl.
locks - so probably for DIO case we still need overwrite check in
ext4_dio_write_iter()
Thanks for review!!
-ritesh
>
> Honza
>
>> /*
>> * Calculate the first and last logical blocks respectively.
>> */
>> @@ -3437,13 +3441,15 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
>> map.m_len = min_t(loff_t, (offset + length - 1) >> blkbits,
>> EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK) - map.m_lblk + 1;
>>
>> - if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE)
>> + if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && !overwrite)
>> ret = ext4_iomap_alloc(inode, &map, flags);
>> else
>> ret = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
>>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> + if (IS_DAX(inode) && overwrite)
>> + WARN_ON(!(map.m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED));
>>
>> ext4_set_iomap(inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.4
>>