2020-10-24 15:20:30

by Andrea Righi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: swap file broken with ext4 fast-commit

I'm getting the following error if I try to create and activate a swap
file defined on an ext4 filesystem:

[ 34.406479] swapon: file is not committed

The swap file is created in the root filesystem (ext4 mounted with the
following options):

$ grep " / " /proc/mounts
/dev/vda1 / ext4 rw,relatime 0 0

No matter how long I wait or how many times I run sync, I'm still
getting the same error and the swap file is never activated.

A git bisect shows that this issue has been introduced by the following
commit:

aa75f4d3daae ("ext4: main fast-commit commit path")

Simple test case to reproduce the problem:

# fallocate -l 8G /swapfile
# chmod 0600 /swapfile
# mkswap /swapfile
# swapon /swapfile

Maybe we're missing to mark the inode as clean somewhere, even if the
transation is committed to the journal?

Thanks,
-Andrea


2020-10-24 15:23:09

by Andrea Righi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: swap file broken with ext4 fast-commit

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> I'm getting the following error if I try to create and activate a swap
> file defined on an ext4 filesystem:
>
> [ 34.406479] swapon: file is not committed
>
> The swap file is created in the root filesystem (ext4 mounted with the
> following options):
>
> $ grep " / " /proc/mounts
> /dev/vda1 / ext4 rw,relatime 0 0
>
> No matter how long I wait or how many times I run sync, I'm still
> getting the same error and the swap file is never activated.
>
> A git bisect shows that this issue has been introduced by the following
> commit:
>
> aa75f4d3daae ("ext4: main fast-commit commit path")
>
> Simple test case to reproduce the problem:
>
> # fallocate -l 8G /swapfile
> # chmod 0600 /swapfile
> # mkswap /swapfile
> # swapon /swapfile
>
> Maybe we're missing to mark the inode as clean somewhere, even if the
> transation is committed to the journal?

I think I see the problem. There's something wrong in
ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(), it looks like the logic to check if the
inode is dirty is quite the opposite.

I'll test and send a patch soon.

-Andrea