---- 在 星期三, 2021-02-24 17:22:35 Su Yue <[email protected]> 撰写 ----
>
> On Wed 24 Feb 2021 at 16:51, Chengguang Xu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > ---- 在 星期三, 2021-02-24 15:52:17 Su Yue <[email protected]> 撰写
> > ----
> > >
> > > Cc to the author and linux-xfs, since it's xfsprogs related.
> > >
> > > On Tue 23 Feb 2021 at 21:40, Chengguang Xu
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems the expected result of testcase of "Hole + Data"
> > > > in generic/473 is not correct, so just fix it properly.
> > > >
> > >
> > > But it's not proper...
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/generic/473.out | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/473.out b/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > index 75816388..f1ee5805 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > +++ b/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Data + Hole
> > > > 1: [256..287]: hole
> > > > Hole + Data
> > > > 0: [0..127]: hole
> > > > -1: [128..255]: data
> > > > +1: [128..135]: data
> > > >
> > > The line is produced by `$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v 0 65k"
> > > $file |
> > > _filter_fiemap`.
> > > 0-64k is a hole and 64k-128k is a data extent.
> > > fiemap ioctl always returns *complete* ranges of extents.
> >
> > Manual testing result in latest kernel like below.
> >
> > [root@centos test]# uname -a
> > Linux centos 5.11.0+ #5 SMP Tue Feb 23 21:02:27 CST 2021 x86_64
> > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > [root@centos test]# xfs_io -V
> > xfs_io version 5.0.0
> >
> > [root@centos test]# stat a
> > File: a
> > Size: 4194304 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096
> > regular file
> > Device: fc01h/64513d Inode: 140 Links: 1
> > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > root)
> > Access: 2021-02-24 16:33:20.235654140 +0800
> > Modify: 2021-02-24 16:33:25.070641521 +0800
> > Change: 2021-02-24 16:33:25.070641521 +0800
> > Birth: -
> >
> > [root@centos test]# xfs_io -c "pwrite 64k 64k" a
> > wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 65536
> > 64 KiB, 16 ops; 0.0000 sec (992.063 MiB/sec and 253968.2540
> > ops/sec)
> >
> > [root@VM-8-4-centos test]# xfs_io -c "fiemap -v 0 65k" a
> > a:
> > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
> > 0: [0..127]: hole 128
> > 1: [128..135]: 360..367 8 0x1
> >
>
> Sorry, my carelessness. I only checked btrfs implementation but
> xfs
> and ext4 do return the change you made.
>
Yeah, it seems there is no bad side effect to show only specified range of extents
and keep all the same behavior is also good for testing. I can post a fix patch for
this but before that let us to wait some feedback from maintainers and experts.
Thanks,
Chengguang
>
> > [root@centos test]# xfs_io -c "fiemap -v 0 128k" a
> > a:
> > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
> > 0: [0..127]: hole 128
> > 1: [128..255]: 360..487 128 0x1
> >
> >
> > >
> > > You may ask why the ending hole range is not aligned to 128
> > > in
> > > 473.out. Because
> > > fiemap ioctl returns nothing of querying holes. xfs_io does
> > > the
> > > extra
> > > print work for holes.
> > >
> > > xfsprogs-dev/io/fiemap.c:
> > > for holes:
> > > 153 if (lstart > llast) {
> > > 154 print_hole(0, 0, 0, cur_extent, lflag, true,
> > > llast,
> > > lstart);
> > > 155 cur_extent++;
> > > 156 num_printed++;
> > > 157 }
> > >
> > > for the ending hole:
> > > 381 if (cur_extent && last_logical < range_end)
> > > 382 print_hole(foff_w, boff_w, tot_w, cur_extent,
> > > lflag,
> > > !vflag,
> > > 383 BTOBBT(last_logical),
> > > BTOBBT(range_end));
> > >
> > > > Hole + Data + Hole
> > > > 0: [0..127]: hole
> > > > 1: [128..255]: data
> > >
>
>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> ---- 在 星期三, 2021-02-24 17:22:35 Su Yue <[email protected]> 撰写 ----
> >
> > On Wed 24 Feb 2021 at 16:51, Chengguang Xu <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ---- 在 星期三, 2021-02-24 15:52:17 Su Yue <[email protected]> 撰写
> > > ----
> > > >
> > > > Cc to the author and linux-xfs, since it's xfsprogs related.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue 23 Feb 2021 at 21:40, Chengguang Xu
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It seems the expected result of testcase of "Hole + Data"
> > > > > in generic/473 is not correct, so just fix it properly.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > But it's not proper...
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > tests/generic/473.out | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/473.out b/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > > index 75816388..f1ee5805 100644
> > > > > --- a/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > > +++ b/tests/generic/473.out
> > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Data + Hole
> > > > > 1: [256..287]: hole
> > > > > Hole + Data
> > > > > 0: [0..127]: hole
> > > > > -1: [128..255]: data
> > > > > +1: [128..135]: data
> > > > >
> > > > The line is produced by `$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v 0 65k"
> > > > $file |
> > > > _filter_fiemap`.
> > > > 0-64k is a hole and 64k-128k is a data extent.
> > > > fiemap ioctl always returns *complete* ranges of extents.
> > >
> > > Manual testing result in latest kernel like below.
> > >
> > > [root@centos test]# uname -a
> > > Linux centos 5.11.0+ #5 SMP Tue Feb 23 21:02:27 CST 2021 x86_64
> > > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > [root@centos test]# xfs_io -V
> > > xfs_io version 5.0.0
> > >
> > > [root@centos test]# stat a
> > > File: a
> > > Size: 4194304 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096
> > > regular file
> > > Device: fc01h/64513d Inode: 140 Links: 1
> > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > > root)
> > > Access: 2021-02-24 16:33:20.235654140 +0800
> > > Modify: 2021-02-24 16:33:25.070641521 +0800
> > > Change: 2021-02-24 16:33:25.070641521 +0800
> > > Birth: -
> > >
> > > [root@centos test]# xfs_io -c "pwrite 64k 64k" a
> > > wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 65536
> > > 64 KiB, 16 ops; 0.0000 sec (992.063 MiB/sec and 253968.2540
> > > ops/sec)
> > >
> > > [root@VM-8-4-centos test]# xfs_io -c "fiemap -v 0 65k" a
> > > a:
> > > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
> > > 0: [0..127]: hole 128
> > > 1: [128..135]: 360..367 8 0x1
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, my carelessness. I only checked btrfs implementation but
> > xfs
> > and ext4 do return the change you made.
> >
>
> Yeah, it seems there is no bad side effect to show only specified range of extents
> and keep all the same behavior is also good for testing. I can post a fix patch for
> this but before that let us to wait some feedback from maintainers and experts.
generic/473 is marked as broken by commit 715eac1a9e66 ("generic/47[23]:
remove from auto/quick groups").
Thanks,
Eryu