udf_expand_file_adinicb() is called under inode->i_rwsem and
mapping->invalidate_lock. i_rwsem is safe wrt fs reclaim,
invalidate_lock on this inode is safe as well (we hold inode reference
so reclaim will not touch it, furthermore even lockdep should not
complain as invalidate_lock is acquired from udf_evict_inode() only when
truncating inode which should not happen from fs reclaim).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index d8493449d4c5..2f831a3a91af 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ int udf_expand_file_adinicb(struct inode *inode)
return 0;
}
- page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, GFP_NOFS);
+ page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!page)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.35.3