2014-01-09 20:08:12

by Eric Sandeen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] tune2fs: allow removal of dirty journal with two "-f" options

Jim pointed out that "tune2fs -f -O ^has_journal" won't remove the
journal if the needs_recovery flag is set; the manpage seems to indicate
that it should. And if you've lost an external journal and can no longer
replay it, how should one proceed?

Change tune2fs so that two "-f" options will allow removal of a dirty
journal from a filesystem, even if the filesystem needs recovery.

e2fsck can then do its best to pick up the pieces.

Reported-by: Jim Faulkner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
---

diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.8.in b/misc/tune2fs.8.in
index da21080..e07da28 100644
--- a/misc/tune2fs.8.in
+++ b/misc/tune2fs.8.in
@@ -248,7 +248,10 @@ option is useful when removing the
filesystem feature from a filesystem which has
an external journal (or is corrupted
such that it appears to have an external journal), but that
-external journal is not available.
+external journal is not available. If the filesystem appears to require
+journal replay, the
+.B \-f
+flag must be specified twice to proceed.
.sp
.B WARNING:
Removing an external journal from a filesystem which was not cleanly unmounted
diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.c b/misc/tune2fs.c
index 0eddf6d..2318dbb 100644
--- a/misc/tune2fs.c
+++ b/misc/tune2fs.c
@@ -903,8 +903,9 @@ static int update_feature_set(ext2_filsys fs, char *features)
"read-only.\n"), stderr);
return 1;
}
- if (sb->s_feature_incompat &
- EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER) {
+ if ((sb->s_feature_incompat &
+ EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER) &&
+ f_flag < 2) {
fputs(_("The needs_recovery flag is set. "
"Please run e2fsck before clearing\n"
"the has_journal flag.\n"), stderr);
@@ -1428,7 +1429,7 @@ static void parse_tune2fs_options(int argc, char **argv)
open_flag |= EXT2_FLAG_RW;
break;
case 'f': /* Force */
- f_flag = 1;
+ f_flag++;
break;
case 'g':
resgid = strtoul(optarg, &tmp, 0);



2014-02-21 01:34:57

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune2fs: allow removal of dirty journal with two "-f" options

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:08:11PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jim pointed out that "tune2fs -f -O ^has_journal" won't remove the
> journal if the needs_recovery flag is set; the manpage seems to indicate
> that it should. And if you've lost an external journal and can no longer
> replay it, how should one proceed?
>
> Change tune2fs so that two "-f" options will allow removal of a dirty
> journal from a filesystem, even if the filesystem needs recovery.
>
> e2fsck can then do its best to pick up the pieces.
>
> Reported-by: Jim Faulkner <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied.

- Ted