Hi
This patch adds trace_jbd2_drop_transaction and trace_jbd2_update_superblock_end
because there are similar tracepoints in jbd and they are needed in jbd2 as well.
Seiji
Signed-off-by: Seiji Aguchi <[email protected]>
---
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 2 ++
fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 ++
include/trace/events/jbd2.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
index 16a698b..2bfd8b0 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -797,5 +797,7 @@ void __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transact
J_ASSERT(journal->j_committing_transaction != transaction);
J_ASSERT(journal->j_running_transaction != transaction);
+ trace_jbd2_drop_transaction(journal, transaction);
+
jbd_debug(1, "Dropping transaction %d, all done\n", transaction->t_tid);
}
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index f24df13..5953b3d 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -1185,6 +1185,8 @@ void jbd2_journal_update_superblock(journal_t *journal, int wait)
} else
write_dirty_buffer(bh, WRITE);
+ trace_jbd2_update_superblock_end(journal, wait);
+
out:
/* If we have just flushed the log (by marking s_start==0), then
* any future commit will have to be careful to update the
diff --git a/include/trace/events/jbd2.h b/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
index 7596441..ae59bc2 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(jbd2_commit, jbd2_commit_logging,
TP_ARGS(journal, commit_transaction)
);
+DEFINE_EVENT(jbd2_commit, jbd2_drop_transaction,
+
+ TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *commit_transaction),
+
+ TP_ARGS(journal, commit_transaction)
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_end_commit,
TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *commit_transaction),
@@ -229,6 +236,27 @@ TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail,
__entry->block_nr, __entry->freed)
);
+TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_update_superblock_end,
+
+ TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, int wait),
+
+ TP_ARGS(journal, wait),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( dev_t, dev )
+ __field( int, wait )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->dev = journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev;
+ __entry->wait = wait;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("dev %d,%d wait %d",
+ MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
+ __entry->wait)
+);
+
#endif /* _TRACE_JBD2_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
--
1.7.1
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch adds trace_jbd2_drop_transaction and trace_jbd2_update_superblock_end
> because there are similar tracepoints in jbd and they are needed in jbd2 as well.
>
> Seiji
Looks good, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <[email protected]>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Seiji Aguchi <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 2 ++
> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 ++
> include/trace/events/jbd2.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> index 16a698b..2bfd8b0 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> @@ -797,5 +797,7 @@ void __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transact
> J_ASSERT(journal->j_committing_transaction != transaction);
> J_ASSERT(journal->j_running_transaction != transaction);
>
> + trace_jbd2_drop_transaction(journal, transaction);
> +
> jbd_debug(1, "Dropping transaction %d, all done\n", transaction->t_tid);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index f24df13..5953b3d 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1185,6 +1185,8 @@ void jbd2_journal_update_superblock(journal_t *journal, int wait)
> } else
> write_dirty_buffer(bh, WRITE);
>
> + trace_jbd2_update_superblock_end(journal, wait);
> +
> out:
> /* If we have just flushed the log (by marking s_start==0), then
> * any future commit will have to be careful to update the
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/jbd2.h b/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
> index 7596441..ae59bc2 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/jbd2.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(jbd2_commit, jbd2_commit_logging,
> TP_ARGS(journal, commit_transaction)
> );
>
> +DEFINE_EVENT(jbd2_commit, jbd2_drop_transaction,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *commit_transaction),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(journal, commit_transaction)
> +);
> +
> TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_end_commit,
> TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *commit_transaction),
>
> @@ -229,6 +236,27 @@ TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail,
> __entry->block_nr, __entry->freed)
> );
>
> +TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_update_superblock_end,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(journal_t *journal, int wait),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(journal, wait),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( dev_t, dev )
> + __field( int, wait )
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->dev = journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev;
> + __entry->wait = wait;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev %d,%d wait %d",
> + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> + __entry->wait)
> +);
> +
> #endif /* _TRACE_JBD2_H */
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
>
--
>> This patch adds trace_jbd2_drop_transaction and trace_jbd2_update_superblock_end
>> because there are similar tracepoints in jbd and they are needed in jbd2 as well.
>>
>> Seiji
>
>Looks good, thanks.
>
>Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <[email protected]>
>
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seiji Aguchi <[email protected]>
Are there anyone else who can review my patch?
Seiji