2022-12-06 01:37:40

by Ye Bin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/6] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea

From: Ye Bin <[email protected]>

Syzbot found the following issue:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 at mm/page_alloc.c:5534 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor261 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ccf080 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffc90003ccf0e0 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003ccf108
RBP: ffffc90003ccf198 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003ccf0e0
R10: fffff52000799e21 R11: 1ffff92000799e1c R12: 0000000000040c40
R13: 1ffff92000799e18 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000799e14
FS: 0000555555c10300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffc36f70000 CR3: 00000000744ad000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:223 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:246 [inline]
__kmalloc_large_node+0x8a/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:1096
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:943 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xfe/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:968
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:558 [inline]
ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2558 [inline]
ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2673 [inline]
ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe3f/0x1cd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2765
__ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x2b8/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5857
ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5900 [inline]
__ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x51a/0x670 fs/ext4/inode.c:5978
ext4_inline_data_truncate+0x548/0xd00 fs/ext4/inline.c:2021
ext4_truncate+0x341/0xeb0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4221
ext4_process_orphan+0x1aa/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:339
ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474
__ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5515 [inline]
ext4_fill_super+0x80ed/0x8610 fs/ext4/super.c:5643
get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1324
vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531
do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
</TASK>

Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc
can allocate maxium size memory is 4M.
XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)',
so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger
warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'.
To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc()
to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block().

Reported-by: [email protected]
Fixes: 54dd0e0a1b25 ("ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.h | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.h b/fs/ext4/xattr.h
index 824faf0b15a8..444ee46838c3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.h
@@ -71,15 +71,10 @@ struct ext4_xattr_entry {
#define IFIRST(hdr) ((struct ext4_xattr_entry *)((hdr)+1))

/*
- * XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but for the purposes of checking
- * for file system consistency errors, we use a somewhat bigger value.
- * This allows XATTR_SIZE_MAX to grow in the future, but by using this
- * instead of INT_MAX for certain consistency checks, we don't need to
- * worry about arithmetic overflows. (Actually XATTR_SIZE_MAX is
- * defined in include/uapi/linux/limits.h, so changing it is going
- * not going to be trivial....)
+ * Use XATTR_SIZE_MAX to checking for file system consistency errors. Extended
+ * attribute length exceed XATTR_SIZE_MAX is ilegal.
*/
-#define EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX (1 << 24)
+#define EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX XATTR_SIZE_MAX

/*
* The minimum size of EA value when you start storing it in an external inode
--
2.31.1


2022-12-06 12:07:04

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/6] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea

On Tue 06-12-22 09:58:01, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
>
> Syzbot found the following issue:
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 at mm/page_alloc.c:5534 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor261 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
> RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ccf080 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: ffffc90003ccf0e0 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003ccf108
> RBP: ffffc90003ccf198 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003ccf0e0
> R10: fffff52000799e21 R11: 1ffff92000799e1c R12: 0000000000040c40
> R13: 1ffff92000799e18 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000799e14
> FS: 0000555555c10300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007ffc36f70000 CR3: 00000000744ad000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:223 [inline]
> alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:246 [inline]
> __kmalloc_large_node+0x8a/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:1096
> __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:943 [inline]
> __kmalloc+0xfe/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:968
> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:558 [inline]
> ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2558 [inline]
> ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2673 [inline]
> ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe3f/0x1cd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2765
> __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x2b8/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5857
> ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5900 [inline]
> __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x51a/0x670 fs/ext4/inode.c:5978
> ext4_inline_data_truncate+0x548/0xd00 fs/ext4/inline.c:2021
> ext4_truncate+0x341/0xeb0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4221
> ext4_process_orphan+0x1aa/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:339
> ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474
> __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5515 [inline]
> ext4_fill_super+0x80ed/0x8610 fs/ext4/super.c:5643
> get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1324
> vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531
> do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> </TASK>
>
> Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc
> can allocate maxium size memory is 4M.
> XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)',
> so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger
> warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'.
> To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc()
> to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block().
>
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Fixes: 54dd0e0a1b25 ("ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()")
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>

The changelog speak about kvmalloc() while your patch changes
EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX. This needs to be fixed. If Ted is find with this
change, I have no problem with it either but I remember there were some
discussions about what EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX should be when ea_inode feature
has been developed. Ted might remember.

Also the change from kmalloc() to kvmalloc() is a desirable one anyway. It
is not always easy to find physically contiguous 64k of memory so
kvmalloc() makes the allocation much more likely to succeed.

Honza

--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

2022-12-06 13:45:49

by yebin (H)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/6] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea



On 2022/12/6 20:04, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 06-12-22 09:58:01, Ye Bin wrote:
>> From: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
>>
>> Syzbot found the following issue:
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 at mm/page_alloc.c:5534 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor261 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
>> RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534
>> RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ccf080 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: ffffc90003ccf0e0 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 0000000000000000
>> RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003ccf108
>> RBP: ffffc90003ccf198 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003ccf0e0
>> R10: fffff52000799e21 R11: 1ffff92000799e1c R12: 0000000000040c40
>> R13: 1ffff92000799e18 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000799e14
>> FS: 0000555555c10300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00007ffc36f70000 CR3: 00000000744ad000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:223 [inline]
>> alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:246 [inline]
>> __kmalloc_large_node+0x8a/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:1096
>> __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:943 [inline]
>> __kmalloc+0xfe/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:968
>> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:558 [inline]
>> ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2558 [inline]
>> ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2673 [inline]
>> ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe3f/0x1cd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2765
>> __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x2b8/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5857
>> ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5900 [inline]
>> __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x51a/0x670 fs/ext4/inode.c:5978
>> ext4_inline_data_truncate+0x548/0xd00 fs/ext4/inline.c:2021
>> ext4_truncate+0x341/0xeb0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4221
>> ext4_process_orphan+0x1aa/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:339
>> ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474
>> __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5515 [inline]
>> ext4_fill_super+0x80ed/0x8610 fs/ext4/super.c:5643
>> get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1324
>> vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531
>> do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040
>> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
>> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
>> __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>> </TASK>
>>
>> Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc
>> can allocate maxium size memory is 4M.
>> XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)',
>> so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger
>> warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'.
>> To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc()
>> to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block().
>>
>> Reported-by: [email protected]
>> Fixes: 54dd0e0a1b25 ("ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()")
>> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]>
> The changelog speak about kvmalloc() while your patch changes
> EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX. This needs to be fixed. If Ted is find with this
> change, I have no problem with it either but I remember there were some
> discussions about what EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX should be when ea_inode feature
> has been developed. Ted might remember.

I'm sorry I forgot to modify the commit message, I will modify the
changelog again.

> Also the change from kmalloc() to kvmalloc() is a desirable one anyway. It
> is not always easy to find physically contiguous 64k of memory so
> kvmalloc() makes the allocation much more likely to succeed.
>
> Honza

A later patch use kvmalloc to allocate extended attribute value memory.